PDF Download

[1]ZHONG Xue-bin,LIU Cheng-wu,CHEN Rui-kai.Landscape Ecology Design in Reconstruction Project of Low Hill and Hillock Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(04):147-152.

Copy

Landscape Ecology Design in Reconstruction Project of Low Hill and Hillock Area

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 19 Number of periods: 2012 04 Page number: 147-152 Column: Public date: 2012-08-20

Title:: Landscape Ecology Design in Reconstruction Project of Low Hill and Hillock Area

Author(s):: ZHONG Xue-bin, LIU Cheng-wu, CHEN Rui-kai; Department of Resources and Environmental Science, Hubei University of Science and Technology, Xianning, Hubei 437100, China

Keywords:: landscape ecological design; reconstruction of low hilly land; Yandianhe Village

CLC:: F205;F301.23

DOI:: -

Abstract:: The spatial pattern of landscape must be adjusted and reconstructed by the reforming project in the low hilly land. With a case of Yandianhe Village in Hong’an County, Hubei Province, two programs of landscape ecological design was proposed based on the ecology investigation and the landscape ecology district of function. And that, this research compared with the two programs by landscape spatial pattern analysis, landscape stability appraisal and ecology service value reckoning. The results showed that the landscape ecological stability reduced with the program 1 although a variety of water conservancy and slope protection engineering measures were used. And the evaluation value of ecological stability was down from 0.546 to 0.340, in spite that the ecosystem service value increased by 1.0985×10⁶ Yuan/a; compared with program 1, program 2 was in order to ecological compensation, which made the landscape ecological stability improve greatly with introduction of some new landscape components. The evaluation value of ecological stability was up to 0.66, and the ecosystem service value increased by 1.3965×10⁶ Yuan/a.

References:: [1] 毛显强,钟瑜,张胜.生态补偿的理论探讨[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2002,12(4):38-41.
[2] 肖笃宁,解伏菊,魏建兵.区域生态建设与景观生态学的使命[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(10):1731-1736.
[3] 钟学斌,喻光明,张敏,等.丘陵山区土地利用的景观空间格局与农业景观生态设计[J].山地学报,2008,26(4):473-480.
[4] 黄霄羽,毕银丽,张占录.土地整理中景观生态规划设计系统构建[J].资源与产业,2008,10(5):125-129.
[5] 任志远,张艳芳.土地利用变化与生态安全评价[M].北京:科学出版社,2003:105-107.
[6] Hargis C D,Bissonette J A,David J L.The behavior of landscape metrics commonly used in the study of habitat fragmentation[J].Landscape Ecology,1989,13(3):167-186.
[7] 庞彦军,刘开第,张博文.综合评价系统客观性指标权重的确定方法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2001(8):37-42.
[8] 赵景柱.生态系统服务的物质量与价值量评价方法的比较分析[J].应用生态学报,2002,11(2):290-292.
[9] Costanza R.The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital[J].Nature,1997,387:253-260.
[10] 谢高地,甄霖,鲁春霞,等.生态系统服务的供给、消费和价值化[J].资源科学,2008,30(1):93-99.
[11] 卢远,华璀,邓兴礼.丘陵地区土地可持续利用的景观生态评价[J].山地学报,2004,22(5):533-538.
[12] 刘秀花,李林.庄浪县梯田化建设对生态-经济-社会协调发展的作用[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(2):65-67.
[13] 刘勇,吴次芳,岳文泽.土地整理项目区的景观格局及其生态效应[J].生态学报,2008,28(5):2261-2269.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01