PDF Download

[1]TENG Yao-hua,ZHANG Jun-yi,SU Wei-ci.Study on Low-Carbon Eco-agriculture Model and Reduction Countermeasures in the Case of Three Gorges Reservoir[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(02):226-230.

Copy

Study on Low-Carbon Eco-agriculture Model and Reduction Countermeasures in the Case of Three Gorges Reservoir

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 19 Number of periods: 2012 02 Page number: 226-230 Column: Public date: 2012-04-20

Title:: Study on Low-Carbon Eco-agriculture Model and Reduction Countermeasures in the Case of Three Gorges Reservoir

Author(s):: TENG Yao-hua¹, ZHANG Jun-yi², SU Wei-ci^3,4; 1. Songtao Autonomous County Environment Protection Bureau, Tongren, Guizhou 554100, China;
2. Department of Geography and Tourism, Guizhou Normal College, Guiyang 550003, China;
3. Department of Geography, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing 400047, China;
4. Institute of Mountain Resource, Guizhou Academy of Sciences, Guiyang 550001, China

Keywords:: Three Gorges Reservoir; carbon emission; development model; strategy

CLC:: F303;X322

DOI:: -

Abstract:: Based on the analysis on the characteristics of natural environment and problems of circular eco-agricultural development,analogy method was used to estimate the agricultural system of greenhouse gas emissions in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area.The results showed that the reservoir area the amount of farmland emissions CO₂ was 1.0×10⁵ tons,CH₄ was 7.0×10⁴ tons,and N₂O was 5.0×10³ tons in 2008,respectively.Based on the estimation of greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural production of Three Gorges Reservoir Area,suggestions on low—carbon eco-agriculture development models of Three Gorges Reservoir area were put forward.These models include integrated mountain stereoscopic development models,three—dimensional ecological fishery breeding models,the prevention and control of soil erosion model,characteristics—based ecological agriculture circulation composite models and the reduction measures.

References:: [1] 李迎春,林而达,甄晓林.农业温室气体清单方法研究最新进展[J].地球科学进展,2007,22(10):1076-1080.
[2] 李晶,王明星,王跃思,等.农田生态系统温室气体排放研究进展[J].大气科学,2003,27(4):740-749.
[3] 赵其国,钱海燕.低碳经济与农业发展思考[J].生态环境学报,2009,18(5):1609-1614.
[4] 李长生,肖向明,Frolking S,等.中国农田的温室气体排放[J].第四纪研究,2003,23(5):493-503.
[5] 吕耀,章予舒.农业外部性识别评价及其内部化[J].地理科学进展,2007,26(1):123-132.
[6] 李明峰,董云社,耿元波,等.农业生产的温室气体排放研究进展[J].山东农业大学学报:自然科学版,2003,34(2):311-314.
[7] 李长生.土壤碳储量减少:中国农业之隐患:中美农业生态系统碳循环对比研究[J].第四纪研究,2000,20(4):345-349.
[8] 杨学明,张晓平,方华军.农业土壤固碳对缓解全球变暖的意义[J].地理科学,2003,23(1):101-106.
[9] 王鹏程,肖文发,张守攻,等.三峡库区主要森林植被类型土壤渗透性能研究[J].水土保持学报,2007,21(6):51-57.
[10] 秦志英.重庆市综合自然灾害分区研究[J].西南师范大学学报:自然科学版,2000,25(3):310-315.
[11] 胡德龙;贺金生.三峡库区农业持续发展的重要途径:农林复合系统(Agroforestry)建设[C]//面向21世纪的中国生物多样性保护:第三届全国生物多样性保护与持续利用研讨会论文集,1998:348-353.
[12] 逯非,王效科,韩冰,等.农田土壤固碳措施的温室气体泄漏和净减排潜力[J].生态学报,2009,29(9):4993-5006.
[13] 杨俊,韩圣慧,李富春,等.川渝地区农业生态系统氧化亚氮排放[J].环境科学,2009,30(9):2684-2693.
[14] 王礼茂.几种主要碳增汇/减排途径的对比分析[J].第四纪研究,2004,24(2):191-197.
[15] 方创琳,冯仁国,黄金川.三峡库区不同类型地区高效生态农业发展模式与效益分析[J].自然资源学报,2003,18(2):228-234.
[16] 苏维词,张军以.河道型消落带生态环境问题及其防治对策:以三峡库区重庆段为例[J].中国岩溶,2010,29(4):445-450.
[17] 刘江.中国可持续发展战略研究[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2001:431-442.
[18] 苏维词,滕建珍,陈祖权.长江三峡库区生态农业发展模式探讨[J].地理与地理信息科学,2003,19(1):83-86.
[19] 张军以,苏维词,张凤太.基于PSR模型的三峡库区生态经济区土地安全评价[J].中国环境科学,2011,31(6):1039-1044.
[20] 杨德伟,陈治谏,廖晓勇,等.三峡库区小流域生态农业发展模式探讨:以杨家沟、戴家沟为例[J].山地学报,2006,24(3):366-372.
[21] 韩广轩,朱波,江长胜,等.川中丘陵区稻田甲烷排放及其影响因素[J].农村生态环境,2005,21(1):1-6.
[22] 李成芳,曹凑贵,汪金平,等.不同耕作方式下稻田土壤CH₄和CO₂的排放及碳收支估算[J].农业环境科学学报,2009,28(1):82-86.
[23] 张军以,苏维词.基于低碳经济的生态农业发展模式与对策[J].农业现代化研究,2011,32(1):2482-2488.
[24] 潘根兴,周萍,张旭辉,等.不同施肥对水稻土作物碳同化与土壤碳固定的影响[J].生态学报,2006,26(11):3704-3710.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01