PDF Download

[1]SUN Qi-qi,SONG Ge,QI Mei-ling.Analysis of Land Ecological Safety Evaluation of Harbin City Based on Principal Component Analysis[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(01):234-238.

Copy

Analysis of Land Ecological Safety Evaluation of Harbin City Based on Principal Component Analysis

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 19 Number of periods: 2012 01 Page number: 234-238 Column: Public date: 2012-02-20

Title:: Analysis of Land Ecological Safety Evaluation of Harbin City Based on Principal Component Analysis

Author(s):: SUN Qi-qi¹, SONG Ge¹, QI Mei-ling²; 1. College of Resources and Environment, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China;
2. Shenyang Bureau of State Land Supervision, Shenyang 110136, China

Keywords:: land ecological security; principal component analysis; evaluation; Harbin City

CLC:: F301

DOI:: -

Abstract:: Land ecological security is relation to the overall regional ecological environment sustainable development. Evaluation index system has been constructed according to Harbin City land resources situation, from three aspects including nature, economy, and society by selecting 21 indices which have close relation with land ecological security. Land ecological security situation of Harbin City from 2001 to 2008 was analyzed by using the principal component analysis method, safety threshold was set and preliminary discussed finally. The results of the study show that land ecological security situation of Harbin City is at the trend of degressive fluctuations from 2001 to 2008, but overall is at a safety level. Specific land ecological security changes of Harbin City can be divided into several levels: at a security level before 2002; the land ecological security was in the inflection point in 2003, and then safety levels have been going down to 2007, during this period, although the level performed a little rise in 2005, the general trend is degressive; the security level was somewhat better until 2008. Land ecological levels had been in a wave state and had insecure trend in recent years.

References:: [1] 许月卿, 崔丽.小城镇土地生态安全评价研究:以贵州省猫跳河流域为例[J].水土保持研究, 2007, 14 (5):345-348.
[2] 张虹波, 刘黎明, 张军连, 等.黄土丘陵区土地资源生态安全及其动态评价[J].资源科学, 2007, 29 (4):193-199.
[3] 刘欣, 葛京凤, 冯现辉.河北太行山区土地资源生态安全研究[J].干旱区资源与环境, 2007, 21 (5):68-74.
[4] 左太安, 苏维词, 马景娜, 等.三峡重庆库区针对水土流失的土地资源生态安全评价[J].水土保持学报, 2010, 24 (2):74-78.
[5] 杨赛明, 徐跃通, 张邦花.区域土地资源可持续利用的生态安全评价[J].中国人口·资源与环境, 2010, 20 (3):325-328.
[6] 高桂芹, 韩美.区域土地资源生态安全评价:以山东省枣庄市中区为例[J].水土保持研究, 2005, 12 (5):271-273.
[7] 刘勇, 刘友兆, 徐萍.区域土地资源生态安全评价:以浙江嘉兴市为例[J].资源科学, 2004, 26 (3):69-75.
[8] 杜忠潮, 韩申山.基于主成分分析的土地生态安全评价实证研究:以陕西省10个省辖市为例[J].水土保持通报, 2009, 29 (6):198-207.
[9] 张小虎, 雷国平, 袁磊, 等.黑龙江省土地生态安全评价[J].中国人口·资源与环境, 2009, 19 (1):88-93.
[10] 李玉平, 蔡运龙.河北省土地生态安全评价[J].北京大学学报:自然科学版, 2007, 43 (6):784-789.
[11] 张虹波, 刘黎明.土地资源生态安全研究进展与展望[J].地理科学进展, 2006, 25 (5):77-85.
[12] 林彰平, 刘湘南.东北农牧交错带土地利用生态安全模式案例研究[J].生态学杂志, 2002, 21 (6):16-19.
[13] 汤洁, 朱云峰, 李昭阳, 等.东北农牧交错带土地生态环境安全指标体系的建立与综合评价:以镇赉县为例[J].干旱区资源与环境, 2006, 20 (1):121-124.
[14] 杜巧玲, 许学工, 刘文政.黑河中下游绿洲生态安全评价[J].生态学报, 2004, 24 (9):1918-1920.
[15] 张文梅, 任志远, 王丽霞, 等.城市水土资源生态安全评价:以西安市为例[J].资源科学, 2008, 30 (12):1916-1921.
[16] 周飞, 郭良珍, 陈士银, 等.湛江市土地资源生态安全评价与限制因素[J].水土保持研究, 2010, 17 (5):202-211.
[17] 哈尔滨统计年鉴 (2002-2009)[M].北京:中国统计出版社, 2009.
[18] 黑龙江统计年鉴 (2002-2009)[M].北京:中国统计出版社, 2009.
[19] 徐建华.计量地理学[M].北京:高等教育出版社, 2006:95-98.
[20] 毛文永.生态环境影响评价概论[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社, 2003:172-177.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01