PDF Download

[1]ZHAO Yi-xue.Study on the Tactics of Continued Move and Its Primary Relation Construction of the Ecological Compensation for Returning the Farmland to Forestland or Grassland[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(06):272-276.

Copy

Study on the Tactics of Continued Move and Its Primary Relation Construction of the Ecological Compensation for Returning the Farmland to Forestland or Grassland

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 18 Number of periods: 2011 06 Page number: 272-276 Column: Public date: 2011-12-20

Title:: Study on the Tactics of Continued Move and Its Primary Relation Construction of the Ecological Compensation for Returning the Farmland to Forestland or Grassland

Author(s):: ZHAO Yi-xue^1,2; 1. School of Tourism, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China;
2. Institute of Loess Plateau, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China

Keywords:: ecologic compensation; returning the farmland to forestland or grassland; interrelated contradictory; continued move

CLC:: X171.4;F316.2

DOI:: -

Abstract:: The main relations of ecological compensation and its essential in returning the farmland to forestland or grassland were analyzed, and the quantitative linkage between ecological compensation and returning the farmland to forestland or grassland was constructed by using the synthetic theory and the relative method. The result was as below. Firstly, the regions of converted farmland and lower reaches(or leeward) are the direct or indirect beneficiaries owing to the project of returning the famland to forestland or grassland. But both the state and the people in the area of the returning farmland are sufferers. Secondly, the essential of the ecological compensation was divided into fourteen items. Thirdly, the valley is the line of compensation and in-compensation in the benefit of water and soil conservation. But the wind region of strong or weak is the line of compensation and in-compensation in the benefit of less-sand. Finally, a number of suggestions were put forward in this paper. the results obtained above have the meaning for protecting the project of returning the farmland to forestland or grassland and its benefit.

References:: [1] 张建肖, 安树伟.国内外生态补偿研究综述[J].西安石油大学学报:社会科学版, 2009, 18(1):23-28.
[2] 卢艳丽, 丁四保.国外生态补偿的实践及对我国的借鉴与启示[J].世界地理研究, 2009, 18(3):161-168.
[3] 辛长爽.建立流域生态补偿机制及其对策研究[J].海河水利, 2009(4):8-10.
[4] 孙新章, 谢高地, 甄霖.泾河流域退耕还林(草)综合效益与生态补偿趋向:以宁夏回族自治区固原市原州区为例[J].资源科学, 2007, 29(2):194-200.
[5] 李怀恩, 尚小英, 王媛.流域生态补偿标准计算方法研究进展[J].西北大学学报:自然科学版, 2009, 39(4):667-672.
[6] 何勇, 张健, 陈秀兰.森林生态补偿研究进展及关键问题分析[J].林业经济, 2009(3):76-79.
[7] 秦鹏, 唐绍钧.退耕还林生态补偿制度的经济分析[J].重庆大学学报:自然科学版, 2005, 28(4):163-166.
[8] 秦伟, 朱清科, 赖亚飞.退耕还林工程生态价值评估与补偿:以陕西省吴旗县为例[J].北京林业大学学报, 2008, 35(4):159-164.
[9] 汪为青, 倪才英, 甘荣俊.自然保护区生态补偿问题研究[J].榆林学院学报, 2009, 19(2):8-11.
[10] 燕守广.关于生态补偿概念的思考[J].环境与可持续发展, 2009(3):33-36.
[11] 赵银河, 夏涛, 张忠镇, 等.浅析我国生态补偿的资金筹集与运行机制[J].山东林业科技, 2009(2):110-113.
[12] 水土保持生态补偿机制研究课题组.我国水土保持生态补偿类型划分及机制研究[J].中国水资源, 2009(1):26-31.
[13] 中国水土保持生态补偿机制研究课题组.我国水土保持生态补偿机制研究[J].中国水土保持, 2009(8):5-8.
[14] 左菁.质疑《退耕还林还草条例》补助年限之规定[J].时代法学, 2006, 4(1):60-64.
[15] 马存利, 陈海宏.区域生态补偿的法理基础与制度构建[J].太原师范学院学报:社会科学版, 2009, 8(3):72-75.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01