[1]MIAO Bao-he,ZHENG Yan-hai,FU Fang,et al.Ecological Evaluation on Vegetation Restoration in Bare Lands of Limekiln Site and Road Slope in Mentougou District of Beijing[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(06):125-128.
Copy
Ecological Evaluation on Vegetation Restoration in Bare Lands of Limekiln Site and Road Slope in Mentougou District of Beijing
Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume:
18
Number of periods:
2011 06
Page number:
125-128
Column:
Public date:
2011-12-20
- Title:
- Ecological Evaluation on Vegetation Restoration in Bare Lands of Limekiln Site and Road Slope in Mentougou District of Beijing
- CLC:
- X171.1;F062.2
- DOI:
- -
- Abstract:
- An investigation on evaluating the vegetation restoration effects among 8 different modes(referred as A, B, C, D, E, F, G and H) was conducted in Mentougou District of Beijing. The results showed that D, E and F were much better than the others, A and H were the worst among those modes. Among those 8 vegetation restoration modes, species richness of B was the highest(29±1.15), with A in the second place(23.6±2.02) and G was the lowest(7±1.1). Vegetation coverage of E and F was significantly higher than the others(87% and 88.3%, respectively), but that of A and C was much lower than the others(32% and 48%, respectively). The plant height of B was the highest(546.3 cm), with F in the second place(316 cm), A and C were much lower than the others(44.97 cm and 54.13 cm, respectively). In conclusion, those results suggested that D, E and F were better than the others in vegetation restoration in bare lands of limekiln site and road slope in Mentougou District of Beijing.
- References:
-
[1] 朱海鹰, 徐国钢, 张军.高速公路边坡生态防护施工技术[J].中外公路, 2003, 23(3):83-85.
[2] 刘春霞, 韩烈保.高速公路边坡植被恢复研究进展[J].生态学报, 2007, 27(5):2090-2098.
[3] Matesanz S, Valladares F. Improving revegetation of gypsum slopes is not a simple matter of adding native species: Insights from a multispecies experiment[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2007, 30:67-77.
[4] 张文波, 孙楠.门头沟区生态修复及生态城建设模式探讨[J].生态人类, 2010(3):3-4.
[5] Wang Z Q, Wu L H, Liu T T. Revegetation of steep rocky slopes: Planting climbing vegetation species in artificially drilled holes[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2009, 35:1079-1084.
[6] Yang M H. Landscape design of highway[J]. Journal of China and Foreign Highway, 1998, 18(1):1-4.
[7] Pu Z. The application of planting on highway slope[J]. Gansu Shuili Shuidian Jishu, 2003, 39(4):335-338.
[8] 余新晓, 秦永胜, 陈丽华, 等.北京山地森林生态系统服务功能及其价值初步研究[J].生态学报, 2002, 22(5):627-630.
[9] 李永庚, 蒋高明.矿山废弃地生态重建研究进展[J].生态学报, 2004, 24(1):95-100.
[10] Brooker R W, Maestre F T, Callaway R M. Facilitation in plant communities: The past, the present, and the future[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2008, 96:18-34.
[11] 冯朝阳, 高吉喜, 田美荣, 等.京西门头沟区自然植被滞尘能力及效益研究[J].环境科学研究, 2007, 20(5):155-159.
[12] 史作民, 程瑞梅, 刘世荣.宝天曼落叶阔叶林种群生态位特征[J].应用生态学报, 1999, 10(3):265-269.
[13] 方精云.中国森林生产力及其对全球气候变化的响应[J].植物生态学报, 2000, 24(5):513-517.
[14] 侯英雨, 柳钦火, 延昊, 等.我国陆地植被净初级生产力变化规律及其对气候的响应[J].应用生态学报, 2007, 18(9):1546-1553.
[15] Kreuter U P, Harris H G, Matlock M D, et al. Change in ecosystem service values in the San Antonio area[J]. Ecological Economics, 2001, 39:333-346.
[16] 周广胜, 张新时.全球气候变化的中国自然植被的净第一性生产力研究[J].植物生态学报, 1996, 20(1):11-19.
[17] Tormo J, Garcia-Fayos P, Bochet E. Relative importance of plant traits and ecological filters in road embankment revegetation under semiarid Mediterranean conditions[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2008, 33:258-264.
[18] 周冰冰, 李忠魁, 侯元兆, 等.北京市森林资源价值[M].北京:中国林业出版社, 2000.
[19] 郑元润, 周广胜.基于NDVI的中国天然森林植被净第一性生产力模型[J].植物生态学报, 2000, 24(1):9-12.
[20] Armas C, Pugnaire F I. Plant interactions govern population dynamics in semi-arid plant community[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2005, 93:978-989.
[21] 黄银晓, 林舜华, 韩荣庄, 等.北京主要绿化植物和土壤对大气中硫的积累特点及其指示、净化作用[J].植物学报, 1990, 32(5):380-389.
[22] Nemani R R, Kelling C D, Hashimoto H, et al. Climate-driven increases in global terrestrial net primary production from 1982 to 1999[J]. Science, 2003, 300:1560-1563.
- Similar References:
Memo
-
Last Update:
1900-01-01