PDF Download

[1]JI Xiao-ling,YUE Peng-peng,ZHAN Jing,et al.Effects of Different Mulching Methods on Effective Culture Technique of Mung Bean[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(03):149-152.

Copy

Effects of Different Mulching Methods on Effective Culture Technique of Mung Bean

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 18 Number of periods: 2011 03 Page number: 149-152 Column: Public date: 2011-06-20

Title:: Effects of Different Mulching Methods on Effective Culture Technique of Mung Bean

Author(s):: JI Xiao-ling¹, YUE Peng-peng¹, ZHAN Jing¹, LIU Jian-hua², LEI Jin-yin², ZHANG Xiong¹; 1. Yulin University, Yulin, Shaanxi 719000, China;
2. Hengshan Agro-technical Popularization Center, Hengshan, Shaanxi 719100, China

Keywords:: mulching; mung bean; drought resistant; effect

CLC:: S522

DOI:: -

Abstract:: In this study,the growth status and water effect of mung bean in different mulching methods were researched.The input-output analysis was also performed.The results showed that:(1) Plastic film mulching on ridge(LM),plastic film mulching on‘W’ ridge(GM) and plastic film mulching on whole plot(QM) could promote plant growth of mung bean.The plant height,stem diameter,pod number of one plant and weight of 100-grain were both significantly increased compared to no mulching(CK).(2) The yields of mung bean with LM,GM and QM were increased 112.59%,104.90% and 100.27% than CK respectively,and the differences were very significant than CK(P=0.004<0.01).At the same time,the water use efficiency with LM,GM and QM were improved 124.24%,73.48% and 81.82% respectively.(3) The net income of mung bean with LM,GM and QM were increased 156.98%,116.22% and 64.98% respectively.In the three plastic film mulching treatments,plastic film mulching on ridge was the most effective treatment in improving water use efficiency,yield and economic benefit of mung bean.Furthermore,the operation of plastic film mulching on ridge was very simple,therefor,the prospect for application and extention of LM is relative good.

References:: [1] 朱彦博,程志斌.薄膜地面覆盖对土壤环境及春小麦生长发育的影响[J].甘肃农业科技,1989(3):29-31.
[2] 金胜利,周丽敏,李凤民,等.黄土高原地区玉米双垄全膜覆盖沟播栽培技术土壤水温条件及其产量效应[J].干旱地区农业研究,2010,28(2):28-33.
[3] Li F,Wang P,Wang J,et al.Effects of irrigation before sowing and plastic film mulching on yield and water uptake of spring wheat in semiarid Loess Plateau of China[J].Agricultural Water Management,2004,67(2):77-88.
[4] 吕强,熊瑛,陈明灿,等.不同覆盖方式对烟苗根系生长及耕层生态环境的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2008,26(1):86-90.
[5] 梁美英,卜玉山,李伟,等.不同地膜与覆盖方式土壤水温与作物增产效应[J].山西农业大学学报:自然科学版,2010,30(5):426-431.
[6] 曹正梅,董树亭.覆膜栽培玉米的土壤生态效应研究进展[J].山东农业大学学报:自然科学版,1999,30(4):489-492.
[7] 段德玉,刘小京,李伟强,等.夏玉米地膜覆盖栽培的生态效应研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,2003,21(4):6-9.
[8] 王俊,李凤民,贾宇,等.半干旱地区播前灌溉和地膜覆盖对春小麦产量形成的影响[J].中国沙漠,2004,24(1):77-82.
[9] 刘小兰,李世清.半干旱黄土高原地区春小麦地膜覆盖研究概述[J].西北植物学报,2001,21(2):198-206.
[10] 宋秋华,李凤民,王俊,等.覆膜对春小麦农田微生物数量和土壤养分的影响[J].生态学报,2002,22(12):2125-2132.
[11] 李世清,李凤民,宋秋华,等.半干旱地区地膜覆盖对作物产量和氮效率的影响[J].应用生态学报,2001,12(2):205-209.
[12] 李洪勋,吴伯志.地膜覆盖对玉米生理效应研究[J].耕作与栽培,2003(6):46-48.
[13] 党廷辉,郭栋,戚龙海.旱地地膜和秸秆双元覆盖栽培下小麦产量与水分效应[J].农业工程学报,2008;24(10):20-24.
[14] 马树庆,王琪,郭建平,等.东北地区玉米地膜覆盖增温增产效应的地域变化规律[J].农业工程学报,2007,23(8):66-71.
[15] 曹荣保,武治兴,姜凯喜.旱地绿豆地膜覆盖栽培技术[J].陕西农业科学,1999(5):41-42.
[16] 李斌,李变梅,崔峥嵋.旱地地膜覆盖绿豆高产技术[J].山西农业,2004(1):23.
[17] 孔庆全,赵存虎,贺小勇,等.绿豆地膜覆盖栽培效益分析[J].内蒙古农业科技,2010(6):34.
[18] 李世兰,许正辉,阎彦梅.互助县小麦地膜覆盖与露地栽培经济效益分析[J].现代农业科技,2010(12):59.
[19] Wang X,Li F,Jia Y,et al.Increasing potato yields with additional water and increased soil temperature[J].Agricultural Water Management,2005,78(3):181-194.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01