PDF Download

[1]LIU Jiao,HUANG Yi-xiong,YE Gong-fu,et al.Research on Biomass and Undergrowth Soil Nutrient of Main Tree Species for Shelterbelt along Fujian Coastal Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(01):146-152.

Copy

Research on Biomass and Undergrowth Soil Nutrient of Main Tree Species for Shelterbelt along Fujian Coastal Area

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 18 Number of periods: 2011 01 Page number: 146-152 Column: Public date: 2011-02-20

Title:: Research on Biomass and Undergrowth Soil Nutrient of Main Tree Species for Shelterbelt along Fujian Coastal Area

Author(s):: LIU Jiao¹, HUANG Yi-xiong¹, YE Gong-fu², XU Luo-yuan¹, CHEN Shao-hui¹, HUANG Ru¹, LIU Xiao-fen¹; 1. College of Geographic Science, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350007, China;
2. Fujian Academy of Forestry, Fuzhou 350012, China

Keywords:: biomass; litter; soil nutrient

CLC:: S714.8;S718.556

DOI:: -

Abstract:: Shelterbelt plays an important role in improving the environment. The research on biomass, litter fall and forest soil nutrient could deepen the understanding of the tree growth laws and the interrelationship between the tree and the environment.The average sample tree method was adopted to determine the biomass of main tree species for shelterbelt in Haitan Island, namely Casuarina equisetifolia L, Acacia confusa Merr, Pinus thunbergii Parlatore and Pinus elliottii Engelmann. The growth habit and the abundance and deficiency of nutrients among the four species were analyzed through the litter collecting and soil nutrient measurement. The results indicated that: ① The order of the total biomass from large to small was Pinus elliotii Engelmann(270.84 t/hm²) > Pinus thunbergii Parlatore (125.72 t/hm²) > Acacia confusa Merr (75.99 t/hm²) > Casuarina equisetifolia L with bad slash regeneration (56.02 t/hm²). ② From the study of litter, it could be concluded that September was the common growth month and the litter production was large, but for Casuarina equisetifolia L and Acacia confusa Merr, another peak of litter return was in May. ③ According to the soil nutrient of the four species, the undergrowth soil nutrient of Acacia confusa Merr was relatively abundant, but nutrient substances of the four tree species were comparatively poor on the whole. This might influence the biomass of shelterbelt and then affect the function of the windbreak and sand fixation and also the soil and water conservation.

References:: [1] 郑达贤, 方祖光, 沙济琴, 等.滨海木麻黄林带生态系统(福建海坛岛试验研究)[M].福州:福建科学技术出版社, 1994:33-146.
[2] 徐俊森.海岸带湿地松木麻黄混交林营造效果研究[J].福建林业科技, 1998, 25(2):28-32.
[3] 陈德旺.木麻黄大叶相思混交林生长效果、防护功能和土壤肥力研究[J].防护林科技, 2003(3):13-15.
[4] 谭芳林, 徐俊森, 林武星, 等.福建滨海沙地造林树种的适应性与选择研究[J].林业科学, 2003, 39(专刊1):100-105.
[5] 曾焕生.福建平潭岛木麻黄农田防护林带更新试验研究[J].林业勘察设计, 2005(2):5-9.
[6] 叶功富, 吴锡麟, 张海清, 等.沿海防护林生态系统不同群落生物量和能量的研究[J].林业科学, 2003, 39(专刊1):8-14.
[7] 张海清, 叶功富, 林益明, 等.福建东山县赤山海拔沙地厚荚相思林与湿地松林生物量和能量的研究[J].厦门大学学报:自然科学版, 2005, 44(1):123-127.
[8] 叶功富, 张立华, 侯杰, 等.滨海沙地木麻黄人工林细根生物量及其动态研究[J].应用与环境生物学报, 2007, 13(4):481-485.
[9] 李尚妙.营造台湾相思水土保持林对土壤结构和养分的影响[J].福建林业科技, 1999, 26(2):34-36.
[10] 王舒凤, 郑郁善, 陈雄, 等.木麻黄湿地松混交林生物量研究[J].福建林学院学报, 2001, 21(2):153-156.
[11] 林盛.福建省沿海防护林不同相思树种生物量及其分配的探讨[J].安徽农学通报, 2008, 14(14):100-101.
[12] 黄义雄, 沙济琴, 谢皎如, 等.福建平潭岛木麻黄防护林带的生物生产力[J].生态学杂志, 1996, 15(2):4-14.
[13] 林金顺.福建省平潭沿海秋茄人工林群落的生物量研究[J].防护林科技, 2005(2):6-8.
[14] Amarasingheand M D, Balasubramaniam S.Net primary productivity of two mangrove foreststands on the northwestern coast of SriLanka[J].Hydrobiologia, 1992, 247(1/3)37-47.
[15] 薛立, 杨鹏.森林生物量研究综述[J].福建林学院学报, 2004, 24(3):283-284.
[16] 佐藤大七郎.陆地植物群落的物质生产[M].聂绍荃, 译.北京:科学出版社, 1986:21-47.
[17] 叶功富, 张水松, 徐俊森, 等.木麻黄低效防护林的结构特征和防护效能研究[J].防护林科技, 2000(专刊1):29-32.
[18] 黄义雄, 郑达贤, 方祖光, 等.福建滨海木麻黄防护林带的生态经济效益研究[J].林业科学, 2003, 39(1):31-35.
[19] 叶功富, 张海清, 卢昌义, 等.福建东山滨海沙地木麻黄林生态系统的能量特征[J].应用生态学报, 2005, 16(10):1812-1816.
[20] 陈美高.不同年龄马尾松人工林生物量结构特征[J].福建林学院学报, 2006, 26(4):332-335.
[21] 柯玉涛.农田木麻黄防护林网更新技术研究[J].防护林科技, 2005(3):9-11.
[22] 李轩然, 刘琪璟, 胡理乐, 等.不同方法计算湿地松林生物量的比较[J].生态学杂志, 2006, 25(12):1594-1598.
[23] 任海, 彭少麟, 向言词.鹤山马占相思人工林的生物量和净初级生产力[J].植物生态学报, 2000, 24(1):18-21.
[24] 曾小平, 蔡锡安, 赵平, 等.南亚热带丘陵3种人工林群落的生物量及净初级生产力[J].北京林业大学学报, 2008, 30(6):148-152.
[25] 孔凡斌, 方华.不同密度年龄火炬松林生物量对比研究[J].林业科技, 2003, 28(3):6-9.
[26] 张清海, 叶功富, 林益明.东南滨海沙地主要造林树种的生物量与能量[J].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版, 2007, 31(3):143-146.
[27] 田大伦, 项文化, 闫文德.马尾松与湿地松人工林生物量动态及养分循环特征[J].生态学报, 2004, 24(10):2207-2210.
[28] 徐叨心, 陈顺伟, 高智慧, 等.4个沿海岩质海岸防护林树种生物量初步研究[J].浙江林业科技, 2004, 24(5):4-6.
[29] 叶功富, 张清海, 卢昌义, 等.滨海沙地木麻黄林生态系统的凋落物及其热值研究[J].应用与环境生物学报, 2007, 13(1):23-28.
[30] 郭瑞红, 叶功富, 卢昌义, 等.不同生长发育阶段木麻黄人工林的凋落物动态[J].海峡科学, 2008(10):11-18.
[31] 范金顺, 高兆蔚, 施天锡, 等.福建林业土壤[M].福州:福建科学技术出版社, 1993.89.
[32] 游秀花, 蒋尔可.不同森林类型土壤化学性质的比较研究[J].江西农业大学学报, 2005, 27(3):357-360.
[33] 孔繁昇.福建海岛植被[M].福州:福建科学技术出版社, 1999.
[34] 林德喜, 樊后保, 苏兵强, 等.马尾松林下套种阔叶树土壤理化性质的研究[J].土壤学报, 2004, 41(4):655-659.
[35] 李杏芬.滨海沙地引种相思类树种生长与生态效应分析[J].防护林科技2007(5):18-20.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01