PDF Download

[1]ZHONG Chong-fu,ZHANG Qing-song,HUI Jian-chun,et al.Effects of Modifiers on Zinc, Chromium and Nutrient Availabilities in Soil[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(06):233-236.

Copy

Effects of Modifiers on Zinc, Chromium and Nutrient Availabilities in Soil

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 17 Number of periods: 2010 06 Page number: 233-236 Column: Public date: 2010-12-20

Title:: Effects of Modifiers on Zinc, Chromium and Nutrient Availabilities in Soil

Author(s):: ZHONG Chong-fu¹, ZHANG Qing-song¹, HUI Jian-chun², ZHU Xue-mei¹; 1. College of Resources and Environment, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya’an, Sichuan 625014, China;
2. Ya’an Soil and Water Conservation Monitoring Substation, Ya’an, Sichuan 625000, China

Keywords:: modifier; compound pollution of zinc and chromium; soil nutrient; availability

CLC:: S156.2

DOI:: -

Abstract:: Five different types of modifiers were applied in compound pollution of zinc and chromium soil to analyze the effects of modifiers on zinc, chromium and nutrient availabilities in soil. Five modifiers changed the soil pH. Superphosphate, wheat straw and rape straw decreased soil pH, and lime and rabbit manure increased soil pH. Five modifiers significantly decreased the available zinc and chromium contents in soil. The lowest available zinc content (20.00 mg/kg) appeared in the wheat straw (high concentration) treatment, which decreased by 53.25% compared with CK, and the lowest available chromium content (3.18 mg/kg) appeared in the lime (high concentration) treatment by 60.15% compared with CK. All modifiers significantly increased the soil available phosphorus, potassium and alkaline hydrolyzed nitrogen contents, except that superphosphate and lime decreased available potassium content. The maximum alkaline hydrolyzed nitrogen (124.56 mg/kg) appeared in the rabbit manure (high concentration) treatment, which increased by 41.51% compared with the CK. The maximum available phosphorus (42 mg/kg) appeared in the superphosphate (high concentration) treatment, increased by 133.33% compared with the CK, and the maximum available potassium (211.56 mg/kg) appeared in the wheat straw (high concentration) treatment, increased by 136.88% compared with the CK.

References:: [1] 陈义群,董元华.土壤改良剂的研究与应用进展[J].生态环境,2008,17(3):1282-1289.
[2] 陈同斌.重金属对土壤的污染[J].金属世界,1999(3):10-11.
[3] 高永恒,孙吉雄,王有国,等.土壤改良剂对草坪床土理化性质的影响[J].草原与草坪,2004(2):34-36.
[4] 张黎明,邓万刚.土壤改良剂的研究与应用现状[J].华南热带农业大学学报,2005,11(2):32-34.
[5] 许晓平,汪有科,冯浩,等.土壤改良剂改土培肥增产效应研究综述[J].中国农学通报,2007,23(9):331-334.
[6] 崔德杰,张玉龙.土壤重金属污染现状与修复技术研究进展[J].土壤通报,2004,35(3):432-437.
[7] 胡克伟,关连珠.改良剂原位修复重金属污染土壤研究进展[J].中国土壤与肥料,2007,21(4):443-446.
[8] Gworek B.Use of synthetic zeolites of 3A and 5A type for lead immobilization in anthropogenic soils[J].Polish Journal of Soil Science,1992,25(1):35-39.
[9] Gworek B.Lead inactivation in soils by zeolites[J].Plant and Soil,1992,143(1):71-74.
[10] Garcia-Sanchez A,Alastuey A,Uerol X.Heavy metal adsorption by different minerals:application to the remediation of polluted soils[J].The Science of the Total Environment,1999,24(2):179-188.
[11] 胡钟胜,章钢娅,王广志,等.改良剂对烟草吸收土壤中镉铅影响的研究[J].土壤学报,2006,43(2):233-239.
[12] 邢世和,熊德中,周碧青,等.不同土壤改良剂对土壤生化性质与烤烟产量的影响[J].土壤通报,2005,36(1):72-75.
[13] Rogoz A.The content and uptake of some micronutrient and heavy metals in sunflowers and maize depending on the dose of lime[J].Zeszyty Problemowe Nank Rolniczych,1996,434(1):213-218.
[14] 丁凌云,蓝崇钰.不同改良剂对重金属污染农田水稻产量和重金属吸收的影响[J].生态环境,2006,15(6):1204-1208.
[15] 鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].3版.北京:中国农业出版社,2000.
[16] 陈英旭,朱祖祥,何增耀.土壤中铬的有效性与污染生态效应[J].生态学报,1995,15(1):55-57.
[17] 王凯荣,张玉烛,胡荣桂.不同土壤改良剂对降低重金属污染土壤上水稻糙米铅镉含量的作用[J].农业环境科学学报,2007,26(2):476- 481.
[18] 孙健,铁柏清,周浩,等.不同改良剂对铅锌尾矿污染土壤中灯心草生长及重金属积累特性的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2006,25(3):637-643.
[19] 邹晓霞,陕红,陈磊,等.秸秆和猪粪施用对樱桃萝卜的效果比较及对土壤性状的影响[J].中国农学通报,2009,25(5):165-172.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01