PDF Download

[1]HE Shu-qin,ZHENG Zi-cheng,MENG Qing-wen,et al.Study on Land Ecological Safety Based on Ecological Footprint in Ya’an City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(06):118-122.

Copy

Study on Land Ecological Safety Based on Ecological Footprint in Ya’an City

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 17 Number of periods: 2010 06 Page number: 118-122 Column: Public date: 2010-12-20

Title:: Study on Land Ecological Safety Based on Ecological Footprint in Ya’an City

Author(s):: HE Shu-qin¹, ZHENG Zi-cheng², MENG Qing-wen², GONG Yuan-bo¹, WANG Chang-quan²; 1. College of Forestry, Sichuan Agriculture University, Ya’an, Sichuan 625014, China;
2. College of Resources and Environment, Sichuan Agriculture University, Ya’an, Sichuan 625014, China

Keywords:: land ecological security; ecological footprint; ecological capacity; ecological tension index

CLC:: F323.21

DOI:: -

Abstract:: Based on the statistical data of Ya’an in 1999-2006, we carried out initial research for the city’s ecological footprint, ecological capacity and ecological deficit. The results showed that the ecological footprint per capita in Ya’an city increased from 1.068 hm² in 1999 to 1.657 hm² in 2006, whereas, the ecological capacity per capita decreased from 0.925 hm² to 0.832 hm²; the ecological deficit per capita increased from 0.143 hm² to 0.825 hm²; the ecological tension index increased from 0.858 to 1.126. Ecological footprint million GDP fluctuation was between 1.87 hm² and 2.78 hm² with national average of 2.212 hm². Ya’an ecological footprint per capita exceeded the ecological carrying capacity per capita, showing a huge ecological deficit and ecological deficit is basically linear upward trend. The results indicated that the development model of Ya’an city was not sustainable, and the land resources was almost in the ecology over burden condition, suggesting that the land ecological environment is at risk. The results would provide theory basis for revealing the essence of regional ecological safety of land, and at the same time, it pointed out that the coordination of people, resources and regional economic development might alleviate the situation of insecurity.

References:: [1] Jonathan Loh.地球生态报告[R].世界自然基金会,2004.
[2] Rees W E.Ecolocal footprints and appropriated carrying capacity:what urban economics leaves out [J].Environment and urbanization,1992,4(2):121-130.
[3] 徐中民,张志强.中国1999年生态足迹计算与发展能力分析[J].应用生态学报,2003,14(2):280-285.
[4] 朱国锋,杨小梅,万国宁,等.甘肃省2004年生态足迹计算与分析[J].甘肃联合大学学报,2008,22(5):62-65.
[4] 杨开忠,杨咏.生态足迹分析理论与方法[J].地球科学进展,2000,15(6):630-636.
[5] 李月辉,张薇.生态足迹方法及研究进展[J].生态学杂志,2006,25(3):334-339.
[6] 王书华,毛汉英.生态足迹研究的国内外近期进展[J].自然资源学报,2002,17(6):776-782.
[7] 王书玉,卞新民.生态足迹理论方法的改进及应用[J].应用生态学报,2007,18(9):1977-1981.
[8] 张晶,刘耀林,陈新明.基于生态足迹的浙江省生态安全动态研究[J].水土保持通报,2008,28(4):18-190.
[9] 王根绪,程国栋,钱鞠.生态安全评价研究中的问题[J].应用生态学报,2003,14(9):1551-1556.
[10] 姚猛,韦保仁.生态足迹分析方法研究进展[J].资源与产业,2008,10(3):70-74.
[11] 陈敏,张丽君,王如松,等.1978-2003年中国生态足迹动态分析[J].资源科学,2005,27(6):132-139.
[12] 肖玲,董林林,兰叶霞,等.基于生态压力指数的江西省生态安全评价[J].地域研究与开发,2008,27(1):119-121.
[13] 王兴贵,李铁松.重庆市2003-2005年生态足迹分析[J].江西科学,2007,25(4):446-449.
[14] 中国环境与发展国际合作委员会,世界自然基金会.中国生态足迹报告(下)[R].2004.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01