[1]CHEN Qiang,QIN Fu-cang,YUE Yong-jie.Comparative Study on Coupling Relationship between Soil Properties and Land Use in Northeast Agriculture and Animal Husbandry Ecotone[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(02):186-189,194.
Copy
Comparative Study on Coupling Relationship between Soil Properties and Land Use in Northeast Agriculture and Animal Husbandry Ecotone
Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume:
17
Number of periods:
2010 02
Page number:
186-189,194
Column:
Public date:
2010-04-20
- Title:
- Comparative Study on Coupling Relationship between Soil Properties and Land Use in Northeast Agriculture and Animal Husbandry Ecotone
- Keywords:
- watershed; land use; soil; physical and chemical properties
- CLC:
- F301.24;S153
- DOI:
- -
- Abstract:
- Soil properties of different land use types were studied in Took Baer dun channel small watershed. Cultivated soil bulk density and soil porosity conditions were the best, forestry-pastoral land was the second. There was a little difference between forestry and pasture land, and these two parameters for agriculture-forestry land were the worst. With the increase in soil depth, soil bulk density rose and the soil porosity delined. Soil average natural moisture content and water storage capacity of 0-80 cm in arable land were maximum, the second for griculture-forestry land and forestry, the lowest for pasture land. For soil total element contents of different land use types, cultivated land is the highest, the second is pasture land, next is agriculture-forestry land, forestry-pastoral land and forestry land. For soil available element contents of different land use types, they are the highest in cultivated soil, next is forestry land. And there is no difference in forestry-pastoral land and pasture land, the lowest is agriculture-forestry land. For organic matter content of different use types land, the highest is pasture land and cultivated land, and no difference in the other different use types land. Comprehensive analysis showed that: physical and chemical properties of cultivated land was the best, but agriculture-forestry complex land was poor in this watershed.
- References:
-
[1] Turner B L Ⅱ, Meyer W B.Global land-use and land-cover change: an overview[C]//Changes in Land Use and Land Cover: A Global Perspective.William B M.Turner Ⅱ.Cambridge.1994.
[2] Islam K R, Wei1R R.Land use effects on soil quality in a tropical forest ecosystem of Bangladesh[J].Agyiculture Ecostems and Environment, 2000, 79: 9-16.
[3] 傅伯杰, 陈利顶, 马克明.黄土丘陵区小流域土地利用变化对生态环境的影响[J].地理学报, 1999, 54(3):241-246.
[4] Lal R, Mokma D, Lowery B.Relation between soil quality and erosion[M]//Soil Quality and Soil erosion.Rattan Lal(ed.).Washtington: CRC Press.1999:237-258.
[5] 朱祖祥.土壤学[M].北京:农业出版社, 1983:275-280.
[6] 陈奇伯, 王克勤, 齐实, 等.不同生态脆弱区土壤侵蚀对土地生产力影响对比研究[J].水土保持通报, 2005, 25(3):29-30.
[7] 黄昌勇.土壤学[M].北京:中国农业出版社, 2000: 67-68.
[8] 黄荣珍, 杨玉盛, 张金池, 等.不同林地类型土壤水库蓄水特性研究[J].水土保持通报, 2005, 25(3):1-5.
[9] 徐宁, 吴兆录, 李正玲.滇西北亚高山不同土地利用类型土壤容重与根系生物量的比较研究[J].安徽农业科学, 2008, 36(5):1961-1963.
[10] 郑顺安, 常庆瑞, 齐雁冰.黄土高原不同林龄土壤质地和矿质元素差异研究[J].干旱地区农业研究, 2006, 24(6):94-97.
[11] 孔祥斌, 张风荣, 齐伟, 等.集约化农区土地利用变化对土壤养分的影响:以河北省曲周县为例[J].地理学报, 2003, 58(3):333-342.
- Similar References:
Memo
-
Last Update:
1900-01-01