PDF Download

[1]YANG Guo-an,XU Yong,GUO Teng-yun.Eco-environmental Construction on the Loess Plateau Based on the Perspective of the Vulnerability and Sustainable Livelihoods Approaches[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(02):64-69.

Copy

Eco-environmental Construction on the Loess Plateau Based on the Perspective of the Vulnerability and Sustainable Livelihoods Approaches

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 17 Number of periods: 2010 02 Page number: 64-69 Column: Public date: 2010-04-20

Title:: Eco-environmental Construction on the Loess Plateau Based on the Perspective of the Vulnerability and Sustainable Livelihoods Approaches

Author(s):: YANG Guo-an¹, XU Yong², GUO Teng-yun²; 1. Institute of Modern Urban-Rural Development Planning, the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 100730, China;
2. Institute of Geography and Resources Science Research, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China

Keywords:: Loess Plateau; eco-environment; vulnerability; sustainable livelihoods

CLC:: X171.1;F323.2

DOI:: -

Abstract:: In recent years, the vulnerability and sustainable livelihoods approaches have been the most important topics in the fields of sustainable sciences. This paper researches on the water and soil erosion modes and the eco-environmental construction with the concept of vulnerability and the sustainable livelihoods approaches, and analyzes the characteristics of the five kinds of ecological de-farming modes: the dams de-farming, the relieve de-farming, the ladder de-farming, the rain water harvesting project and the ecological migration, and argues that the essence of all kinds of ecological de-farming modes exists in changing the spatial and temporal characteristics of water and soil on the Loess Plateau, to control the water loss and soil erosion, to protect eco-environment from steady deterioration, and to achieve the ecological security and sustainable development in the of the middle and of the lower reaches of the Yellow River. Different ecological de-farming mode has advantages and disadvantages respectively, and the vulnerability is different too, thus the applications of them have to take the rule of territorial differentiation and sustainable livelihoods of the local people into consideration in the mean time, have to take the whole situation into account.

References:: [1] 张维邦.治理黄土高原必须抓住关键突破口[J].山西大学学报:哲学社会科学版, 2006, 29(6):82-85.
[2] 徐勇, 韩国义, 朱会义.黄土高原生态重建与区域可持续发展研究范式探讨[J].水土保持研究, 2003, 10(4):10-14.
[3] 景可.加快黄土高原生态环境建设的战略思考[J].水土保持通报, 2001, 21(1):1-5.
[4] 许炯心.黄土高原生态环境建设的若干问题与研究需求[J].水土保持研究, 2000, 7(2):10-14.
[5] Roberts M G, 杨国安.可持续发展研究方法国际进展:脆弱性分析方法与可持续生计方法比较[J].地理科学进展, 2003, 22(1):12-22.
[6] Turne B L, Kasperson R E, Matsone P A, et al.A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science[J].PNAS, 2003, 8: 8074-8079.
[7] Kates R W, Clark W C, Corell R, et al.Environment and Development: Sustainability Science[J].Science, 2001, 292:641-642.
[8] Gaillard J C E A.Maceda Elodie, Stasiak Iwan, et al.Sustainable livelihoods and people’s vulnerability in the face of coastal hazards[J].J.ConserUation, 2009, 13:119-129.
[9] Scoones I.Livelihoods perspectives and rural development[J].J.Peasant Stud, 2009, 36(1): 171-196.
[10] Carney D.Sustainable livelihoods approaches: Progress and Possibilities for Change[M].London: DFID, 2002.
[11] 徐勇.黄土高原政策驱动土地利用变化与可持续农业响应模式:以宝塔区和安塞县为例[D].北京:中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 2005:89-93.
[12] 徐勇, 田均良, 沈洪泉, 等.生态重建模式的评价方法:以黄土丘陵区为例[J].地理学报, 2004, 59(4):621-628.
[13] 马博虎, 薛学选, 刘毅, 等.梯田、坝地在黄土高原生态恢复中的地位与作用[J].水土保持研究, 2007, 14(4):27-30.
[14] 康晓光.坝系农业—治黄之本[J].科技导报, 1993(8):3-6.
[15] 黄河中上游管理局.淤地坝概论[M].北京:中国计划出版社, 2005:151-153.
[16] 王继军, 刘国彬, 谢永生, 等.退耕还林还草下坝系及坝系农业发展初探[J].水土保持研究, 2003, 10(4):280-282.
[17] 刘绍清.再论坝系农业及有关的几个问题[J].水土保持科技情报, 1997(3): 11-13.
[18] 魏霞, 李占斌, 武金惠, 等.淤地坝水毁灾害研究中的几个观念问题讨论[J].水土保持研究, 2007, 14(6):154-157.
[19] 焦菊英, 王万中.黄土高原水平梯田质量对其减水减沙效益的影响[J].国土开发与整治, 1999, 9(4):52-56.
[20] 徐勇, 田均良, 沈洪泉.黄土丘陵区"梯田退耕"生态重建及地域分异特征[J].自然资源学报, 2002, 17(4):430-437.
[21] 徐勇, 马定国, 郭腾云.基于不同退耕模式的黄土丘陵区生态环境建设地域分异特征[J].山地学报, 2004, 22(4):385-392.
[22] 肖国举, 王静.黄土高原集水农业研究进展[J].生态学报, 2003, 23(5):1003-1011.
[23] 韦惠兰, 沈发云, 傅小莉.集水技术与中国半干旱区农村社会结构变迁:以甘肃中部四个农村社区为例[J].干旱区资源与环境, 2005, 19(4):86-91.
[24] 王静, 丁其涛, 伍光和.黄土高原半干旱区集水农业的自然基础及最适宜集水类型的划分[J].中国沙漠, 1999, 19(4):384-389.
[25] 张志山, 魏兴琥, 李新荣, 等.黄土高原西北部集雨水利用的投资与效益分析[J].水科学进展, 2004, 15(6):813-818.
[26] 葛根高娃, 乌云巴图.内蒙古牧区生态移民的概念、问题与对策[J].内蒙古社会科学, 2003, 24(2):118-122.
[27] 王埃平, 陈谦.陕西生态移民初探[J].中国水土保持, 2003(3):24-25.
[28] 刘学敏.西北地区生态移民的效果与问题探讨[J].中国农村经济, 2002(4):47-52.
[29] 贾志军, 徐茂杰.山西省实施生态移民的实践[J].中国水土保持, 2004(5):11-12.
[30] 崔献勇, 海鹰, 宋勇.我国西部生态脆弱区生态移民问题研究[J].新疆师范大学学报:自然科学版, 2004, 23(4):72-76.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01