PDF Download

[1]LI Ling,ZHANG Yu,JIANG Hui-hua,et al.Effects of Tourist Activities on Soil Quality of Wuyishan Scenery District[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(06):56-62.

Copy

Effects of Tourist Activities on Soil Quality of Wuyishan Scenery District

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 16 Number of periods: 2009 06 Page number: 56-62 Column: Public date: 2009-12-20

Title:: Effects of Tourist Activities on Soil Quality of Wuyishan Scenery District

Author(s):: LI Ling^1,2, ZHANG Yu², JIANG Hui-hua², XIE Yu², DU Hong-qing², ZHOU Yan³, ZHANG Hong-jiang¹; 1. College of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Green Chemical Industry Technology of Fujian Province, Department of Environmental and Architecture Engineering, Wuyi College, Wuyishan, Fujian 354300, China;
3. Administration Committee of Wuyishan Scenery District, Wuyishan, Fujian 354300, China

Keywords:: tourist; activity; soil property; soil quality; Wuyishan Scenery District

CLC:: S153

DOI:: -

Abstract:: Topsoil (0-20 cm) properties of five core tourism-spots were studied in Wuyishan Scenery District in 2008. This paper researched effects of tourist activities on soil quality by the integrated soil quality index. The results showed that: (1) The bulk density averagely increases by 43.0%, but the noncapillary porosity, capillary porosity, total porosity, the max-water-holding, min-water-holding and capillary water-holding of all the samples averagely decrease by 31.4%, 27.2%, 28.7%, 26.6%, 26.9% and 30.8% in comparison with the contrasting spots. (2) Due to the impacts of tourist activities, the pH of soi1 increases in some samples and decreases in others; the decreased rates of soil organic matters, total nitrogen, available nitrogen and total phosphorus are relatively greater and respectively are 6.05%, 49.74%, 56.71% and 42.75%; the change rates of total potassium, available potassium and available phosphorus have not any significant regular, up or down. (3) The soil quality integrated indexes of different tourism-spots were ranked as follows: big-red robe (0.601)>water curtain cave (0.382)>king peak (0.327)>a line sky (0.264)>tian-you peak (0.238).The soil quality levels of tourism-spots are influenced by the intensity of tourist activities and some suggestions are proposed to realize the sustainable development of tourism.

References:: [1] Lu Y T,Xiao C.Study on the quality of the ecological environments for tourists an d swallow in swallow cavern,Jianshui[J].Geographica Sinica,1998,53(6):198-203.
[2] Doran J W,Michael R Z.Soil health and sustainability:managing the biotic component of soil quality[J].Applied Soil Ecology,2000,15(1):3-11.
[3] 刘占锋,傅伯杰,刘国华,等.土壤质量与土壤质量指标及其评价[J].生态学报,2006,26(3):901-913.
[4] 颜雄,张杨珠,刘晶. 土壤肥力质量评价的研究进展[J].湖南农业科学,2008(5):82-85.
[5] Cilimburg A.Wildland recreation and human waste:A review of problems,practices and concerns[J]. Environment Management,1999,125(6):587-592.
[6] Eden T.Ricbard J R. Impacts of experimentally applied mountain biking and hikingon vegetation and soil of a decidous forest[J].Environmental Management,2001,27(3):397-409.
[7] 马建华,朱玉涛.嵩山景区旅游活动对土壤组成性质和重金属污染的影响[J].生态学报,2008,28(3):955-965.
[8] 王忠君,蔡君,张启翔. 旅游活动对云蒙山国家森林公园土壤影响的初步研究[J].河北林业科技,2003(5):12-15.
[9] Lowery B,Swan J. Physical properties of selected soils by erosion class[J].Soil Water Conserv,1995,50:306-311.
[10] Joy T,Greg O H.Human impact on the ecosystem[M].Edinburgh:Oliver and Boyo1,1981:175-189.
[11] 管东生,林卫强,陈玉娟.旅游干扰对白云山土壤和植被的影响[J].环境科学,1999,20(6):6-9.
[12] Sun D,Walsh D.Review of studies on environmental impacts of recreation and tourism in Australia[J].Journal of Environmental Management,1998,53:323-338.
[13] Douglas M C.Recreational impacts on erosion and runoff in a central Arizona riparian area[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,1998,53(1):38-42.
[14] Cerman F. Agency for nature conservation,biodiversity and tourism[M].Berlin:Spring-Verlag,1997.
[15] Willian E H,David N C. Wildland recreation:ecology and management(2nd)[M]. New York:John Wiley and Sons,1998.
[16] 秦远好,谢德体,魏朝富,等. 土壤生态环境对游憩活动冲击的响应研究[J]. 水土保持学报,2006,20(3):61-65.
[17] 何东进,洪伟,胡海清,等. 武夷山风景区森林景观土壤物理性质异质性及其分形特征[J].林业科学,2005,41(5):175-179.
[18] 游秀花,蒋尔可.不同森林类型土壤化学性质的比较研究[J]. 江西农业大学学报,2005,27(3):357-360.
[19] 游秀花. 马尾松天然林不同演替阶段土壤理化性质的变化[J]. 福建林学院学报,2005,25(2):121-124.
[20] 尹刚强,田大伦,方晰,等.不同土地利用方式对湘中丘陵区土壤质量的影响[J].林业科学,2008,44(8):9-15.
[21] 庞学勇,包维楷,张咏梅,等. 岷江柏林下土壤物理性质及其地理空间差异[J]. 应用与环境生物学报,2004,10(5):596-601.
[22] Chen C R,Condron L M,Davis M R,et al. Seasonal changes in soil phosphorus and associated microbial properties under adjacent grassland and forest in New Zealand[J].Forest Ecology and Management,2003,177:539-557.
[23] Fu B J,Wang J,Chen L D,et al.The efects of land use on soil moisture variation in the Danangou catchment of the Loess Plateau,China[J].Catena,2003,54:197-213.
[24] 罗姗,张昆,彭涛,等.旅游活动对高原湿地纳帕海土壤理化性质的影响研究[J].安徽农业科学,2008,36(6):2391-2393.
[25] 冯学钢,包浩生.旅游活动对风景区地被植物:土壤环境影响的初步研究[J]. 自然资源学报,1999,14(1):75-78.
[26] 樊后保,李燕燕,黄玉梓,等.马尾松纯林改造成针阔混交林后土壤化学性质的变化[J].水土保持学报,2006,20(4):77-81.
[27] Ros M C,Garcia T,Hernandez M.Short-Term Effects of Human Trampling on Vegetation and Soil Microbial Activity[J].Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis,2004,35(11/12):1591-1603.
[28] 颜雄,张杨珠,刘晶. 土壤肥力质量评价的研究进展[J]. 湖南农业科学,2008(5):82-85.
[29] 张庆费,宋永昌,由文辉. 浙江天童植物群落次生演替与土壤肥力的关系[J].生态学报,1999,19(2):174-178.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01