PDF Download

[1]LIU Ping,MA Ying-jie,XIE Zhi-ping,et al.Effects of Soil Finishing Agent-Guilspare on Soil Moisture and Yield and Quality of Soybean Under Subsurface Drip Irrigation[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(03):164-168.

Copy

Effects of Soil Finishing Agent-Guilspare on Soil Moisture and Yield and Quality of Soybean Under Subsurface Drip Irrigation

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 16 Number of periods: 2009 03 Page number: 164-168 Column: Public date: 2009-06-20

Title:: Effects of Soil Finishing Agent-Guilspare on Soil Moisture and Yield and Quality of Soybean Under Subsurface Drip Irrigation

Author(s):: LIU Ping¹, MA Ying-jie¹, XIE Zhi-ping², HONG Ming¹, ZHANG Yan³, ZHAO Jing-hua¹; 1. College of Water Conservancy and Civil Engineering, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China;
2. Life Science College, Zhongshan University, Guangzhou 510275, China;
3. Xinjiang Survey and Design Institute for Water Resources and Hydropower, Urumqi 830000, China

Keywords:: soil finishing agent; soybean; subsurface drip irrigation; soil moisture; yield; quality

CLC:: S275.6;S152.7;S565.1

DOI:: -

Abstract:: In order to enhance production of soybean in semi-arid area and find new way to solve problems of drought and water shortage of soybean growth process, the study used simulate field plot experiment to find soil finishing agent’s impact on soil moisture, yield and quality of soybean with the subsurface drip irrigation. The results indicate that, under the condition of 2% spraying concentration and 50%, 75%, 100% duty, average soil water content were 22.04%,36.67%,13.15% higher than contrast respectively;yield increased at 11.49%,7.83%,16.02%;total content of protein and oil were 6.95%,0.33%,4.53% than contrast respectively. So it had better water retention and same effect of production increasing and function of improving quality of soybean. At last, under condition of spraying concentration 2% and 50% duty, quality of soybean was the best, WUE was 7.60 kg/(mm·hm²) as maximum, the integrative effect of production increasing and water saving and quality improving of soybean were obvious.

References:: [1] 王春凤, 朱洪德, 冯丽娟.水分和施肥量对高蛋白大豆农艺性状及品质的效应[J].大豆科学, 2008, 27(2):233-237.
[2] 王志新, 杨庆凯.环境因素对大豆化学品质及产量影响研究[J].大豆科学, 2003, 22(1):45-49.
[3] 任红玉, 崔振才, 沈能展, 等.大豆干物质积累与水分动态变化的关系[J].中国油料作物学报, 2005, 27(3):41-44.
[4] 邹新禧.超强吸水剂[M].北京:化学工业出版社, 1991:36-38.
[5] 杜太生, 康绍忠, 魏华.保水剂在节水农业中的应用研究现状与展望[J].农业现代化研究, 2000, 21(5):317-320.
[6] 狄美良, 译.地下滴灌技术[J].节水灌溉, 2002(5):33.
[7] 杨金祥, 季静秋.根灌高效节水农业新技术及其应用效果[J].中国农村水利水电, 2003(7):21.
[8] 汪志农.灌溉排水工程学[M].北京:中国农业出版社, 1998:31-32.
[9] 王会肖, 刘昌明.作物水分利用效率的内涵和研究进展[J].水科学进展, 2000, 11(1):99-104.
[10] 李韵珠, 王凤仙, 黄元仿.土壤水分和养分利用效率几种定义的比较[J].土壤通报, 2000, 3(4):150-155.
[11] 李鸣雷, 谷洁, 高华, 等.不同有机肥对大豆植株性状、品质和产量的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版, 2007, 35(9):67-72.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01