PDF Download

[1]FU Xing-tao,YE Sui-gao,ZHAO Ju-guo,et al.The Effects Analysis on Soil Fertility Conservation and Reinforcement on Artificial Riverside with Vegetable Measures[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(01):237-239,244.

Copy

The Effects Analysis on Soil Fertility Conservation and Reinforcement on Artificial Riverside with Vegetable Measures

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 16 Number of periods: 2009 01 Page number: 237-239,244 Column: Public date: 2009-02-20

Title:: The Effects Analysis on Soil Fertility Conservation and Reinforcement on Artificial Riverside with Vegetable Measures

Author(s):: FU Xing-tao¹, YE Sui-gao², ZHAO Ju-guo², ZHANG Li-ping¹, WU Xi-yuan¹; 1. Zhejiang Provicial Key Laboratory of Subtropic Soil and Plant Nutrition, Institute of Soil and Water Resource and Environment Sciences, College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310029, China;
2. Zhejiang Institute of Hydraulics and Estuary, Zhejiang Guangchuan Engineering Consulting Co. Ltd. Hangzhou 310020, China

Keywords:: artificial riverbank; vegetable measure; soil chemistry characteristics; soil fertility conservation and reinforcement

CLC:: S157

DOI:: -

Abstract:: In order to monitor the recovery effects on artificial riverbank after vegetable measures, this research chose typical reaches and took soil samples from aitificial riverbanks in Haining,Cixi,Shangyu and Yiwu cities in Zhejiang province, the soil chemistry characters were analyzed after air-dried. Results show that soil organic matter increased with vegetable measures, Cixi inning riverway 11.716 g/kg>Shangyu 4.686 g/kg>Yiwu 2.724 g/kg>Cixi plain riverway 1.205 g/kg>Haining 1.013 g/kg. There’s no obvious enhancement in total N and effective K whereas total P decreased 0.037 g/kg, 0.138 g/kg in Haining and Shangyu respectively. And there were significant differences in soil reinforcement and fertility conservation effects among different plants grow years, the effects toned with longer grow years.

References:: [1] 彭少麟.退化生态系统恢复与恢复生态学[J].中国基础科学, 2001(3):18-24.
[2] 张建春, 彭补拙.河岸带及其生态重建研究[J].地理研究, 2002, 21(3):373-383.
[3] 叶碎高, 赵聚国, 应聪惠, 等.河道植物护坡及水土流失观测[J].黑龙江水专学报, 2007, 34(4):9-12.
[4] 胡江波, 杨改河, 张笑培, 等.不同植被恢复模式对土壤肥力的影响[J].河南农业科学, 2007(3):69-72.
[5] 王利民, 寸玉康, 陈奇伯, 等.滇西北高原水土保持生态修复措施的土壤理化效应[J].西北林学院学报, 2006, 21(1):7-11.
[6] 张俊华, 常庆瑞, 贾科利, 等.黄土高原植被恢复对土壤肥力质量的影响研究[J].水土保持学报, 2003, 17(4):38-41.
[7] 代全厚, 张力, 刘艳军, 等.嫩江大堤植物根系固土护堤功能研究[J].中国水土保持, 1998(12):36-37.
[8] 张金池, 康立新, 卢义山, 等.苏北海堤林带树木根系固土功能研究[J].水土保持学报, 1994, 8(2):43-47.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01