[1]Park Ki-hyung,Ding Guo-dong,Wang Wei-wei,et al.Windbreak Effect of Forest Belt of Caragana korshinskili Kom According to the Row Spacing Distance[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(03):207-210.
Copy
Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume:
15
Number of periods:
2008 03
Page number:
207-210
Column:
Public date:
2008-06-20
- Title:
-
Windbreak Effect of Forest Belt of Caragana korshinskili Kom According to the Row Spacing Distance
- Author(s):
-
Park Ki-hyung, Ding Guo-dong, Wang Wei-wei, Wang Xiang-yu, Gao Han, Qin Shu-gao
-
College of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
-
- Keywords:
-
Caragana korshinskili Kom; windbreak effect; sandbreak effect
- CLC:
-
X171.1;S793.3
- DOI:
-
-
- Abstract:
-
The wind speed reduction capability of forest belt of Caragana korshinskili Kom in Yanchi,Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region in China is as follows.At the height of 0.5 m,the windbreak effect is row spacing 1.5 m (29.17%),3.0 m (28.67%).It is very similar in windbreak.But after 3H,row spacing 1.5 m better than row spacing 3.0 m about 2 times.At the point of 20H,the windbreak effect of row spacing 1.5 m is 16.36%.The windbreak effect of row spacing 3.0 m is 9.76%.Further analysis of row spacing 1.5 m and 3.0 m revealed that the wind reduction effect of 2-strip spread to 44.3H (H=1.0 m) and row spacing 3.0 m spread to 30.5H.This result implies that row spacing 1.5 m is most effective for windbreak.At the height of 1.0 m,the wind speed was relatively constant and the reduction rate of wind speed had a minimal variation,with the coefficient of determination of row spacing 1.5 m (8.95 m/s) and 3.0 m (6.70 m/s).The sandbreak effect of row spacing 1.5 m is the wilds (110.08 g)>3H(67.36 g)>7H(64.98 g)>5H(44.65 g)>1H(15.35 g).The sandbreak effect of row spacing 3.0 m is 3H (62.65 g)>the wilds(50.20 g)>1H(45.15 g)>5H(36.28 g)>7H(29.15 g).Especially,the rate of sandbreak of 1H (86.06%) of row spacing 1.5 m is most effective value in whole data.It is better than row spacing 3.0 m (10.06%) about 8.55 times.