PDF Download

[1]Ma Xiaobin,Zhang Jinhe,Sun Yi,et al.Spatiotemporal Pattern and Influencing Factors of Tourism Ecological Security in the Yangtze River Economic Belt[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,31(05):376-388.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.05.011]

Copy

Spatiotemporal Pattern and Influencing Factors of Tourism Ecological Security in the Yangtze River Economic Belt

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 31 Number of periods: 2024 05 Page number: 376-388 Column: Public date: 2024-08-10

Title:: Spatiotemporal Pattern and Influencing Factors of Tourism Ecological Security in the Yangtze River Economic Belt

Author(s):: Ma Xiaobin^1,2, Zhang Jinhe^1,2,3, Sun Yi^1,2, Wang Peijia^1,2, Zhou Leying^1,2; (1.School of Geography and Ocean Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China; 2.Huangshan National Park Ecosystem Observation and Research Station, Ministry of Education, Huangshan, Anhui 245899, China; 3.Academy of Plateau Science and Sustainability, Xining 810016, China)

Keywords:: tourism ecological security; efficiency; exploratory spatial analysis; GTWR; Yangtze River Economic Belt

CLC:: K901

DOI:: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.05.011

Abstract:: [Objective]The aim of this study is to scientifically assess the tourism ecological safety, which is of great practical and theoretical significance for the high quality development and low carbon transformation of tourism in the Yangtze River Economic Belt. [Methods]The Yangtze River Economic Belt was taken as a case study. The ‘DPSIR-DEA' index framework was adopted to construct a regional tourism ecological safety assessment system from an efficiency perspective. The spatial and temporal evolution process and influencing factors of tourism ecological safety in the Yangtze River Economic Belt from 2008 to 2019 were analyzed through exploratory spatial analysis and GTWR model. [Results](1)From 2008 to 2019, the tourism ecological safety of the Yangtze River economic zone showed fluctuating change characteristics, showing a ‘W' spiral upward trend.(2)From 2008 to 2019, the spatial and temporal evolution pattern of tourism ecological safety of the Yangtze River economic zone had strong spatial variability, showing ‘overall stability, local fluctuations' characteristics, in space, the central region tourism ecological safety spatial variation was small, the Yangtze River Delta region, Chengdu-Chongqing region tourism ecological safety volatility.(3)The main factors affecting the Yangtze River economic belt tourism ecological safety were economic, social, environmental and other aspects, and there were significant spatial differences in various aspects. The existence of strong spatial and temporal non-smoothness of factors influencing tourism ecological safety were revealed. [Conclusion]The tourism ecological security in the Yangtze River Economic Zone from the perspective of efficiency were measured and evaluated to provide new perspectives for the high-quality development of tourism and the coordinated development of regional tourism. It will help to enable the value of tourism as an important contribution to the strategy of ‘Greater Protection, No Greater Development' of the Yangtze River Economic Belt.

References:: [1]侯鹏,王桥,申文明,等.生态系统综合评估研究进展:内涵、框架与挑战[J].地理研究,2015,34(10):1809-1823.
Hou P, Wang Q, Shen W M, et al. Progress of integrated ecosystem assessment:Concept, framework and challenges[J]. Geographical Research, 2015,34(10):1809-1823.
[2]章锦河,张捷,王群.旅游地生态安全测度分析:以九寨沟自然保护区为例[J].地理研究,2008,27(2):449-458.
Zhang J H, Zhang J, Wang Q. Measuring the ecological security of tourist destination:Methodology and a case study of Jiuzhaigou[J]. Geographical Research, 2008,27(2):449-458.
[3]世界旅游组织.2030年全球旅游交通碳排放可达19.98亿t[EB/OL]. https://news. un. org/zh/story/2019/12/1046761,2020-06-01.
World Tourism Organization. In 2030, global tourism and transportation carbon emissions can reach 1.998 billion tons[EB/OL]. https://news. un. org/zh/story/2019/12/1046761,2020-06-01.
[4]卢璐,曾坚,于天虎.旅游生态安全研究进展[J].生态科学,2023,42(2):238-247.
Lu L, Zeng J, Yu T H. A review of studies on tourism ecological security[J]. Ecological Science, 2023,42(2):238-247.
[5]穆学青,郭向阳,明庆忠,等.黄河流域旅游生态安全的动态演变特征及驱动因素[J].地理学报,2022,77(3):714-735.
Mu X Q, Guo X Y, Ming Q Z, et al. Dynamic evolution characteristics and driving factors of tourism ecological security in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2022,77(3):714-735.
[6]周彬,钟林生,陈田,等.浙江省旅游生态安全的时空格局及障碍因子[J].地理科学,2015,35(5):599-607.
Zhou B, Zhong L S, Chen T, et al. Spatio-temporal pattern and obstacle factors of ecological security of tourism destination:A case of Zhejiang Province[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2015,35(5):599-607.
[7]Ma X B, Sun B, Hou G L, et al. Evaluation and spatial effects of tourism ecological security in the Yangtze River Delta[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2021,131:108190.
[8]Tang C C, Wu X F, Zheng Q Q, et al. Ecological security evaluations of the tourism industry in Ecological Conservation Development Areas:A case study of Beijing's ECDA[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018,197:999-1010.
[9]李细归,吴清,周勇.中国省域旅游生态安全时空格局与空间效应[J].经济地理,2017,37(3):210-217.
Li X G, Wu Q, Zhou Y. Spatio-temporal pattern and spatial effect of Chinese provincial tourism eco-security[J]. Economic Geography, 2017,37(3):210-217.
[10]Ruan W Q, Li Y Q, Zhang S N, et al. Evaluation and drive mechanism of tourism ecological security based on the DPSIR-DEA model[J]. Tourism Management, 2019,75:609-625.
[11]徐美,刘春腊.张家界市旅游生态安全评价及障碍因子分析[J].长江流域资源与环境,2018,27(3):605-614.
Xu M, Liu C L. Tourism ecological security evaluation and obstacle factors analysis of Zhangjiajie[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2018,27(3):605-614.
[12]李细归,吴黎,吴清,等.中国旅游生态安全测度及障碍因子诊断研究[J].生态经济,2017,33(6):90-95.
Li X G, Wu L, Wu Q, et al. Evaluation on tourism ecological security and diagnosis of its obstacle indicators in China[J]. Ecological Economy, 2017,33(6):90-95.
[13]徐少癸,左逸帆,章牧.基于模糊物元模型的中国旅游生态安全评价及障碍因子诊断研究[J].地理科学,2021,41(1):33-43.
Xu S G, Zuo Y F, Zhang M. Evaluation of tourism ecological security and diagnosis of obstacle factors in China based on fuzzy object element model[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2021,41(1):33-43.
[14]Peng H S, Zhang J H, Lu L, et al. Eco-efficiency and its determinants at a tourism destination:A case study of Huangshan National Park, China[J]. Tourism Management, 2017,60:201-211.
[15]Wang S, Sun C Z, Li X, et al. Sustainable development in China's coastal area:Based on the driver-pressure-state-welfare-response framework and the data envelopment analysis model[J]. Sustainability, 2016,8(9):958.
[16]秦晓楠,程钰.中国旅游城市生态安全系统评估与类型划分研究:基于节点权重约束网络DEA模型[J].地理科学,2019,39(1):156-163.
Qin X N, Cheng Y. Evaluation and type classification on Chinese tourist urban ecological security system:Based on the network DEA model with node weight[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2019,39(1):156-163.
[17]金贵,邓祥征,赵晓东,等.2005—2014年长江经济带城市土地利用效率时空格局特征[J].地理学报,2018,73(7):1242-1252.
Jin G, Deng X Z, Zhao X D, et al. Spatio-temporal patterns of urban land use efficiency in the Yangtze River Economic Zone during 2005—2014[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018,73(7):1242-1252.
[18]Pei L, Du L M, Yue G J. Ecological security assessment of Beijing based on PSR model[J]. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 2010,2:832-841.
[19]Lu C Y, Li W L, Pang M, et al. Quantifying the economy-environment interactions in tourism:Case of Gansu province, China[J]. Sustainability, 2018,10(3):711.
[20]Liu J, Zhang J F, Fu Z B. Tourism eco-efficiency of Chinese coastal cities-Analysis based on the DEA-Tobit model[J]. Ocean & Coastal Management, 2017,148:164-170.
[21]Fan Y P, Fang C L. Evolution process and obstacle factors of ecological security in Western China, a case study of Qinghai Province[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2020,117:106659.
[22]Cecchini L, Venanzi S, Pierri A, et al. Environmental efficiency analysis and estimation of CO₂ abatement costs in dairy cattle farms in Umbria(Italy):A SBM-DEA model with undesirable output[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018,197:895-907.
[23]Tone K. Dealing with undesirable outputs in DEA:A slacks-based measure(SBM)approach[J]. Presentation at Napw Iii, Toronto, 2004:44-45.
[23]Tone K. A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2001,130(3):498-509.
[24]范擎宇,杨山,胡信.耦合视角下长三角地区城镇化协调度的时空特征及交互机制[J].地理研究,2020,39(2):289-302.
Fan Q Y, Yang S, Hu X. Temporal and spatial characteristics and interaction process of urbanization coordination in the Yangtze River Delta Region from the perspective of coupling[J]. Geographical Research, 2020,39(2):289-302.
[25]夏四友,赵媛,许昕,等.1997—2016年中国农业碳排放率的时空动态与驱动因素[J].生态学报,2019,39(21):7854-7865.
Xia S Y, Zhao Y, Xu X, et al. Spatiotemporal dynamics and driving factor analysis of agricultural carbon emissions rate in China from 1997 to 2016[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019,39(21):7854-7865.
[26]Huang B, Wu B, Barry M. Geographically and temporally weighted regression for modeling spatio-temporal variation in house prices[J]. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2010,24(3):383-401.
[27]秦晓楠,卢小丽.基于BP-DEMATEL模型的沿海城市生态安全系统影响因素研究[J].管理评论,2015,27(5):48-58.
Qin X N, Lu X L. A BP-DEMATEL-model-based research of the factors that affect coastal urban ecological security system[J]. Management Review, 2015,27(5):48-58.
[28]杨雪荻,白永平,车磊,等.甘肃省生态安全时空演变特征及影响因素解析[J].生态学报,2020,40(14):4785-4793.
Yang X D, Bai Y P, Che L, et al. Spatio-temporal evolution and influencing factors of ecological security pattern in Gansu Province[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020,40(14):4785-4793.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 2024-08-10