PDF Download

[1]Ma Yali,Liu Xidong,Zhang Liqiang,et al.Response Characteristics of Soil Desiccation to Plantation Vegetation Restoration in Baiyu Mountain Area for 40 Years[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,31(05):192-198.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.05.022]

Copy

Response Characteristics of Soil Desiccation to Plantation Vegetation Restoration in Baiyu Mountain Area for 40 Years

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 31 Number of periods: 2024 05 Page number: 192-198 Column: Public date: 2024-08-10

Title:: Response Characteristics of Soil Desiccation to Plantation Vegetation Restoration in Baiyu Mountain Area for 40 Years

Author(s):: Ma Yali¹, Liu Xidong¹, Zhang Liqiang¹, Zhang Chenchen¹, Gao Dongzhi¹, Zhang Yan¹, Duan Yongqiang², Zhang Yanchang³, Qiao Jiangbo⁴, Shi Changchun¹,5; (1.Shaanxi Academy of Forestry, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710082, China; 2.Jingbian County Forestry Bureau, Jingbian, Shaanxi 718500, China; 3.Dingbian County Forestry Bureau, Dingbian, Shaanxi 718699, China; 4.Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China; 5.State Long-term Observation and Research Station for Maowusu Study Desert Ecosystem in Yulin of Shanxi, Yulin, Shaanxi 719000, China)

Keywords:

CLC:: S718.43

DOI:: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.05.022

Abstract:: [Objective]The aims of this study are to determine the soil desiccation characteristics of a typical plantation in the Baiyu Mountain area, and to provide theoretical basis for reasonable selection and sustainable development of plantation in Baiyu Mountain area. [Methods]The plantations with 40 years of vegetation restoration(Populus×hopeiensis Hu & Chow, Pinus tabulaeformis, and Pinus sylvestris var. mongholica Litv.)were taken as the samples. The barren grassland was taken as the control. Artificial soil drilling method was used to study the drying characteristics and influencing factors of 0—5 m soil in the artificial forest. [Results](1)The average soil water content of different plantations was in the order:grassland(4.95%)>Pinus sylvestris var. mongholica Litv.(4.49%)>Populus×hopeiensis Hu & Chow(4.39%)>Pinus tabuliformis(2.44%).(2)The soil dry layer existed in different plantations and the formation depth and thickness of the dry layer were basically the same, but the average water content of the soil in the dry layer was different, the lowest value was observed in Pinus tabulaeformis and the highest value was observed in the wasteland.(3)The soil desiccation index of different plantations followed the order:Pinus tabuliformis (69.75%)>Populus×hopeiensis Hu & Chow(28.83%)>Pinus sylvestris var. mongholica Litv.(26.73%)>grassland(17.05%).(4)Correlation analysis and multiple linear regression model showed that silt, sand and depth were the main factors affecting soil desiccation characteristics of Pinus sylvestris var. mongholica Litv., Pinus tabulaeformis and Populus×hopeiensis Hu & Chow, respectively. [Conclusion]The soil desiccation degree of Pinus sylvestris var. mongholica Litv. was the lowest after 40 years of planting, Pinus sylvestris var. mongholica Litv. could be used as the best choice for afforestation of typical plantation in Baiyu Mountain area.

References:: [1]朱显谟.黄土高原国土整治“28字方略”的理论与实践[J].中国科学院院刊,1998,13(3):232-236.
Zhu X M. Theory and practice of ‘28-character general plan' for land consolidation in Loess Plateau[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1998,13(3):232-236.
[2]An Z S, Porter S, Kukla G, et al.最近13万年黄土高原季风变迁的磁化率证据[J].科学通报,1990,41(7):529-532.
An Z S, Porter S, Kukla G, et al. Evidence for magnetic susceptibility of monsoon changes in the Loess Plateau during the last 130,000 years[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 1990,41(7):529-532.
[3]Fu B J, Wang S, Liu Y, et al. Hydrogeomorphic ecosystem responses to natural and anthropogenic changes in the Loess Plateau of China[J]. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 2017,45:223-243.
[4]刘国彬,上官周平,姚文艺,等.黄土高原生态工程的生态成效[J].中国科学院院刊,2017,32(1):11-19.
Liu G B, Shangguan Z P, Yao W Y, et al. Ecological effects of soil conservation in Loess Plateau[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2017,32(1):11-19.
[5]Wang Y Q, Shao M A, Zhu Y J, et al. Impacts of land use and plant characteristics on dried soil layers in different climatic regions on the Loess Plateau of China[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2011,151(4):437-448.
[6]邵明安,贾小旭,王云强,等.黄土高原土壤干层研究进展与展望[J].地球科学进展,2016,31(1):14-22.
Shao M A, Jia X X, Wang Y Q, et al. A review of studies on dried soil layers in the Loess Plateau[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2016,31(1):14-22.
[7]Chen L D, Wei W, Fu B J, et al. Soil and water conservation on the Loess Plateau in China:Review and perspective[J]. Progress in Physical Geography, 2007,31(4):389-403.
[8]Czerepko J. A long-term study of successional dynamics in the forest wetlands[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2008,255(3/4):630-642.
[9]易小波,贾小旭,邵明安,等.黄土高原区域尺度土壤干燥化的空间和季节分布特征[J].水科学进展,2017,28(3):373-381.
Yi X B, Jia X X, Shao M A, et al. Regional spatial and seasonal characteristics of soil desiccation on the Loess Plateau[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2017,28(3):373-381.
[10]张晨成,邵明安,王云强,等.黄土区切沟对不同植被下土壤水分时空变异的影响[J].水科学进展,2016,27(5):679-686.
Zhang C C, Shao M A, Wang Y Q, et al. Effects of gullies on the spatiotemporal variability of soil-water under different vegetation types on the Loess Plateau[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2016,27(5):679-686.
[11]王力,邵明安,张青峰.陕北黄土高原土壤干层的分布和分异特征[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(3):436-442.
Wang L, Shao M A, Zhang Q F. Distribution and characters of soil dry layer in North Shaanxi Loess Plateau[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2004,15(3):436-442.
[12]苟清平,朱清科,李依璇,等.陕北黄土区不同林地土壤干燥化效应[J].生态学报,2019,39(19):7161-7168.
Gou Q P, Zhu Q K, Li Y X, et al. Soil desiccation effects under different vegetation types in the Loess Region of Northern Shaanxi[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019,39(19):7161-7168.
[13]包维斌,王幼奇,刘鹏,等.宁南山区不同土地利用类型下土壤水分分布及其干燥化特征[J].草地学报,2020,28(3):775-783.
Bao W B, Wang Y Q, Liu P, et al. Characteristics of soil desiccation and soil water distribution in different land types in mountainous area of southern Ningxia[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020,28(3):775-783.
[14]刘丙霞,任健,邵明安,等.黄土高原北部人工灌草植被土壤干燥化过程研究[J].生态学报,2020,40(11):3795-3803.
Liu B X, Ren J, Shao M A, et al. The process of soil desiccation under artificial shrub and grass in northern Loess Plateau[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020,40(11):3795-3803.
[15]Wang Y Q, Shao M A, Liu Z P. Large-scale spatial variability of dried soil layers and related factors across the entire Loess Plateau of China[J]. Geoderma, 2010,159(1/2):99-108.
[16]白岗栓.白于山山区大扁杏适应性评价及花期延后研究[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2005.
Bai G S. Evaluation of Adaptability and the research about postponing florescence of almond-apricot in Baiyushan hilly area[D]. Yangling, Shaanxi:Northwest A&F University, 2005.
[17]李玉山.黄土区土壤水分循环特征及其对陆地水分循环的影响[J].生态学报,1983,3(2):91-101.
Li Y S. The properties of water cycle in soil and their effect on water cycle for land in the loess region[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 1983,3(2):91-101.
[18]赵炜,赵举,魏占民,等.气化渣改良风沙土对土壤水分物理性质的影响[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(2):64-69.
Zhao W, Zhao J, Wei Z M, et al. Effect of aeolian sandy soil improved by gasification slag on soil water physical properties[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022,29(2):64-69.
[19]王云强.黄土高原地区土壤干层的空间分布与影响因素[D].北京:中国科学院研究生院(教育部水土保持与生态环境研究中心),2010.
Wang Y Q. Spatial distribution and influence factors of dried soil layers across the Loess Plateau[D]. Beijing:Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2010.
[20]曹裕,李军,张社红,等.黄土高原苹果园深层土壤干燥化特征[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(15):72-79.
Cao Y, Li J, Zhang S H, et al. Characteristics of deep soil desiccation of apple orchards in different weather and landform zones of Loess Plateau in China[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2012,28(15):72-79.
[21]李军,陈兵,李小芳,等.黄土高原不同植被类型区人工林地深层土壤干燥化效应[J].生态学报,2008,28(4):1429-1445.
Li J, Chen B, Li X F, et al. Effects of deep soil desiccation on artificial forestlands in different vegetation zones on the Loess Plateau of China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008,28(4):1429-1445.
[22]Jia X X, Shao M A, Zhu Y J, et al. Soil moisture decline due to afforestation across the Loess Plateau, China[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2017,546:113-122.
[23]Huang L M, Shao M A. Advances and perspectives on soil water research in China's Loess Plateau[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2019,199:102962.
[24]杨磊,张子豪,李宗善.黄土高原植被建设与土壤干燥化:问题与展望[J].生态学报,2019,39(20):7382-7388.
Yang L, Zhang Z H, Li Z S. Effects of large-scale re-vegetation on soil desiccation in the Loess Plateau:Problems and perspectives[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019,39(20):7382-7388.
[25]丁文斌,王飞.植被建设对黄土高原土壤水分的影响[J].生态学报,2022,42(13):5531-5542.
Ding W B, Wang F. Effects of vegetation construction on soil moisture in Loess Plateau[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022,42(13):5531-5542.
[26]王云强,邵明安,刘志鹏.黄土高原区域尺度土壤水分空间变异性[J].水科学进展,2012,23(3):310-316.
Wang Y Q, Shao M A, Liu Z P. Spatial variability of soil moisture at a regional scale in the Loess Plateau[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2012,23(3):310-316.
[27]林国伟,李志,李晨曦,等.黄土高原白草塬土壤水分特征及对土地利用变化的响应[J].水土保持通报,2017,37(2):32-38.
Lin G W, Li Z, Li C X, et al. Characteristics of soil water and response to land use changes on Baicao loess tableland[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2017,37(2):32-38.
[28]刘新春,赵勇钢,刘小芳,等.晋西黄土区典型人工植被生长季深层土壤储水量与细根生物量分布特征[J].中国水土保持科学,2019,17(1):95-101.
Liu X C, Zhao Y G, Liu X F, et al. Distribution of moisture storage and fine root biomass in deep soil layers under typical artificial vegetation during the growing season in the Loess Plateau of western Shanxi, China[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019,17(1):95-101.
[29]Wang Y Q, Shao M A, Liu Z P. Vertical distribution and influencing factors of soil water content within 21 m profile on the Chinese Loess Plateau[J]. Geoderma, 2013(193/194):300-310.
[30]熊瑛楠,冯天骄,王平,等.晋西黄土区长期人工林恢复对土壤水分和养分性质的影响[J].水土保持学报,2022,36(2):228-237.
Xiong Y N, Feng T J, Wang P, et al. Effects of long-term artificial forest restoration on soil moisture and nutrient characteristics in the loess area of western Shanxi Province, China[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022,36(2):228-237.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 2024-08-10