PDF Download

[1]ZHOU Han,YAN Junxia,LI Hongjian,et al.Response of Soil and Water Loss on Different Underlying Surfaces of Sloping Farmland to Erosive Rainfall in the Loess Area of Western Shanxi Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,26(04):7-12.

Copy

Response of Soil and Water Loss on Different Underlying Surfaces of Sloping Farmland to Erosive Rainfall in the Loess Area of Western Shanxi Province

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 26 Number of periods: 2019 04 Page number: 7-12 Column: Public date: 2019-06-11

Title:: Response of Soil and Water Loss on Different Underlying Surfaces of Sloping Farmland to Erosive Rainfall in the Loess Area of Western Shanxi Province

Author(s):: ZHOU Han^1,2, YAN Junxia¹, LI Hongjian¹, WANG Xiaoyun²; 1. Institute of Loess Plateau, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China;
2. Shanxi Institute of Soil and Water Conversation Science, Taiyuan 030045, China

Keywords:: sloping farmland; underlying surface; runoff and sediment production; infiltration rate

CLC:: S157.1

DOI:: -

Abstract:: In order to investigate characteristics of runoff, sediment and infiltration of sloping farmlands under different land uses in the loess area of western Shanxi, four underlying surfaces (maize, potato, abandoned farmland, bare land) were used as research objects in runoff plot experiment. Water balance methods were used to analyze the relationship between rainfall and runoff depth, sediment loss and infiltration rate. The runoff depth and sediment loss for the four underlying surface plots increased in the order: maize < potato < abandoned farmland < bare land, but the order for the infiltration rate was on the contrary. The runoff depths in potato, abandoned farmland, and bare land plots increased by 58.95%, 146.85%, and 261.48%, respectively, compared with that in the maize plot, and the losses of sediments increased by 50.45%, 94.98%, and 240.06%, respectively, and the infiltration rates decreased by 5.68%, 14.25% and 25.36%, respectively. A significant power function relationship between runoff depth and I₁₀, I₃₀, P×I₁₀, P×I₃₀ in maize, potato land and bare ground was found, but a linear function between runoff depth and these parameters in abandoned farmland existed. A similar trend as above was also found for amount of sediment loss. The infiltration rate decreased with the increase of rain intensity. Compared with potato, the characteristics of reducing runoff and sediment and increasing infiltration to a certain degree were observed in abandoned farmland and bare land, maize fields.

References:: [1] Chen H, Shao M, Li Y. Soil Desiccation in the Loess Plateau of China[J]. Geoderma, 2008,143(1):91-100.
[2] Chen L, Wei W, Fu B, et al. Soil and Water Conservation on the Loess Plateau in China:Review and Perspective[J]. Progress in Physical Geography, 2007,31(4):3547-3554.
[3] 申震洲,刘普灵,谢永生,等.不同下垫面径流小区土壤水蚀特征试验研究[J].水土保持通报,2006,26(3):6-9.
[4] 赵鹏宇.黄土丘陵区草、灌地不同经营方式下的降雨-入渗-产流研究[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2009.
[5] 马波,刘雨鑫,吴发启.植大豆对坡耕地径流侵蚀产沙的影响[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(4):32-36.
[6] 刘志明.马铃薯对坡面土壤侵蚀的影响研究[D].山西晋中:山西农业大学,2013.
[7] 吴佳,王林华,李占斌,等.黄土高原主要秋作物坡地降雨入渗特征参数研究[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(6):115-119.
[8] 张旭昇,薛天柱,马灿,等.雨强和植被覆盖度对典型坡面产流产沙的影响[J].干旱区资源与环境,2012,26(6):66-70.
[9] 罗利芳,张科利,李双才.撂荒后黄土高原坡耕地土壤透水性和抗冲性的变化[J].地理科学,2003,23(6):728-733.
[10] 李华林,高华端,杨涛,等.凯掌喀斯特小流域不同植被措施的减沙功能[J].浙江农林大学学报,2017,34(4):687-694.
[11] 李瑞,李勇,熊康宁,等.黔中喀斯特区典型土地利用方式及耕作措施的水土流失调控效应[J].水土保持通报,2017,37(6):136-140.
[12] 覃莉,刘凤仙,杨智.喀斯特地区不同坡度径流小区水土流失特征分析[J].中国水土保持,2015(8):63-65.
[13] 李月,周运超,白晓永,等.径流小区法监测水土流失的百年历程(1915-2014年)[J].中国水土保持,2014(12):63-66.
[14] 闫胜军,郭青霞,闫瑞,等.不同土地利用类型下水土流失特征及雨强关系分析[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(2):45-49.
[15] 江忠善,刘志,贾志伟.地形因素与坡地水土流失关系的研究[J].水土保持研究,1990(2):1-8.
[16] 刘栋,刘普灵,邓瑞芬,等.不同下垫面径流小区次降雨侵蚀特征相关分析[J].水土保持通报,2011,31(2):99-102.
[17] 肖继兵,孙占祥,刘志,等.降雨侵蚀因子和植被类型及覆盖度对坡耕地土壤侵蚀的影响[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(22):159-166.
[18] 孙家振.不同植被坡面土壤侵蚀特性研究[D].合肥:安徽农业大学,2011.
[19] 傅伯杰.黄土丘陵沟壑区土地利用结构与生态过程[M].北京:商务印书馆,2002.
[20] 陈洪松,邵明安,张兴昌,等.野外模拟降雨条件下坡面降雨入渗、产流试验研究[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(2):5-8.
[21] Steiner J L, Kanemasu E T, Clark R N. Spray losses and partitioning of water under center pivot sprinkler system[J]. Transactions of the Asae, 1982,26(4):1128-1134.
[22] Saffigna P G, Tanner C B, Keeney D R. Non-Uniform Infiltration Under Potato Canopies Caused by Interception, Stemflow, and Hilling1[J]. Agronomy Journal, 1976,68(2):337-342.
[23] 朱连奇,许叔明,陈沛云.山区土地利用/覆被变化对土壤侵蚀的影响[J].地理研究,2003,22(4):432-438.
[24] 于国强,李占斌,李鹏,等.不同植被类型的坡面径流侵蚀产沙试验研究[J].水科学进展,2010,21(5):593-599.
[25] 卢龙彬,付强,黄金柏.黄土高原北部水蚀风蚀交错区产流条件及径流系数[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(4):17-23.
[26] 李广,黄高宝.雨强和土地利用方式对黄土丘陵区水土流失的影响[J].农业工程学报,2009,25(11):85-90.
[27] 张思毅,梁志权,谢真越,等.植被调控红壤坡面土壤侵蚀机理[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(3):1-5.
[28] Busscher W J. Simulation of Infitration from a Continuous and an Intermittent Subsurface Source[J]. Soil Science, 1979,128(1):49-55.
[29] 寇馨月,黄俊,姜学兵,等.不同下垫面径流小区次降雨对产流产沙的影响[J].水土保持通报,2017,37(2):27-31.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01