PDF Download

[1]XIE Xianxin,LIU Yangyang,CHEN Meiqiu,et al.Impact of Farmers’ Livelihood Capital on Farmers’ Ecological Cultivation Adoption—A Case Study of Jiangxi Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,26(03):293-299,304.

Copy

Impact of Farmers’ Livelihood Capital on Farmers’ Ecological Cultivation Adoption—A Case Study of Jiangxi Province

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 26 Number of periods: 2019 03 Page number: 293-299,304 Column: Public date: 2019-04-12

Title:: Impact of Farmers’ Livelihood Capital on Farmers’ Ecological Cultivation Adoption—A Case Study of Jiangxi Province

Author(s):: XIE Xianxin¹, LIU Yangyang², CHEN Meiqiu¹, YUAN Dongbo¹, LIAO Xiaobin¹, YAO Donglian¹; 1. Research Center on Rural Land Resources Use and Protection, The Key Laboratory of Poyang Lake Basin Agricultural Resources and Ecology, Jiangxi Agriculture University, Nanchang 330045, China;
2. Ganzhou Land And Resources Bureau, Cangzhou Real Estate Registration Center, Ganzhou, Jiangxi 341000, China

Keywords:: livelihood capital; farmers; ecological farming; Jiangxi Province; multiple logistic regression

CLC:: F323.22

DOI:: -

Abstract:: Livelihood capital provides an important livelihood guarantee for farmers’ farming activities. It is of great practical significance to strengthen the ecological protection of cultivated land and guarantee the safety of crop quality according to strengthening the livelihood capital to farmer ecological cultivation adoption degree research. We used 1 488 farmers micro survey data from 11 cities and 47 counties or districts from Jiangxi Province and multinomial Logistic regression model to analyze farmers’ livelihood capital and the change of ecological farming adoption in order to explore the key factors that affect the key influencing factors of livelihood capital on the change of farmers’ ecological cultivation adoption. The results indicated that that farmers’ livelihood capital was relatively low, and there were differences in the five major living capital scores, among which social capital was the highest and natural capital was the lowest; total ecological capital and individual capital values could improve with the deepening of the farmers’ ecological cultivation adoption, farmers’ social capital score changed the most, and financial capital changed the least; social capital and financial capital had always been the key livelihood capital to influence the change of farmers’ ecological cultivation adoption, and both had played a significant role in promoting the change of their adoption; irrigation water, family village cadre or not, surnames status, whether to join a cooperative and whether to buy endowment insurance were the key livelihood capital factors to influence the change of farmers’ ecological cultivation adoption. On the basis of these, we put forward the policy enlightenments to improve the adoption degree of farmers’ ecological farming and promote the sustainable and healthy development of agriculture.

References:: [1] 朱春江, Surendra P. Singh, Sammy L. Comer.论农业与生态文明建设[J].生态经济,2013,29(11):127-131.
[2] 朱立志.农业发展与生态文明建设[J].中国科学院院刊,2013,28(2):232-238.
[3] 童洪志,刘伟.政策组合对农户保护性耕作技术采纳行为的影响机制研究[J].软科学,2018,32(5):18-23.
[4] 耿飙,罗良国.种植规模、环保认知与环境友好型农业技术采用:基于洱海流域上游农户的调查数据[J].中国农业大学学报,2018,23(3):164-174.
[5] 李波,梅倩.农业生产碳行为方式及其影响因素研究:基于湖北省典型农村的农户调查[J].华中农业大学学报:社会科学版,2017,37(6):51-58.
[6] 石志恒,晋荣荣,穆宏杰.信息传播培养理论视域下的农户亲环境行为研究:对甘肃省19个县(区)542农户的调研分析[J].西部论坛,2018,28(2):17-25.
[7] 刘芳,李成友,张红丽.农户环境认知及低碳生产行为模式[J].云南社会科学,2017,37(6):58-63.
[8] 肖新成,倪九派.农户清洁生产技术采纳行为及影响因素的实证分析:基于涪陵区农户的调查[J].西南师范大学学报:自然科学版,2016,41(7):151-158.
[9] 周琼,刘德娟,黄颖,等.稻农4种常用环境友好型技术采用行为研究:对福建省三明市236户稻农的实证调查[J].生态经济,2017,33(12):114-118.
[10] 李想,穆月英.农户可持续生产技术采用的关联效应及影响因素:基于辽宁设施蔬菜种植户的实证分析[J].南京农业大学学报:社会科学版,2013,13(4):62-68.
[11] 储成兵.农户病虫害综合防治技术的采纳决策和采纳密度研究:基于Double-Hurdle模型的实证分析[J].农业技术经济,2015,34(9):117-127.
[12] 姜天龙,赵娜.农户清洁生产技术采用行为的影响因素分析:以吉林省水稻种植户为例[J].吉林农业大学学报,2015,37(6):746-750.
[13] 李然嫣,陈印军.东北典型黑土区农户耕地保护利用行为研究：基于黑龙江省绥化市农户调查的实证分析[J].农业技术经济,2017,36(11):80-91.
[14] 王昕,陆迁.农户生态行为影响因素的实证分析[J].华中农业大学学报：社会科学版,2011,31(3):43-46.
[15] 马聪,刘黎明,袁承程,等.快速城镇化地区农户生计资本分化特征及其对生计策略的影响:以上海市青浦区为例[J].农业现代化研究,2018,39(2):316-324.
[16] 郭秀丽,周立华,陈勇,等.典型沙漠化地区农户生计资本对生计策略的影响:以内蒙古自治区杭锦旗为例[J].生态学报,2017,37(20):6963-6972.
[17] 邝佛缘,陈美球,鲁燕飞,等.生计资本对农户耕地保护意愿的影响分析:以江西省587份问卷为例[J].中国土地科学,2017,31(2):58-66.
[18] 徐建英,孔明,刘新新,等.生计资本对农户再参与退耕还林意愿的影响:以卧龙自然保护区为例[J].生态学报,2017,37(18):6205-6215.
[19] 彭清,王成,邓春.承包农户耕地转出潜力及空间组织经营模式：基于农户生计资本视角[J].资源科学,2017,39(8):1477-1487.
[20] 段伟,马奔,秦青,等.基于生计资本的农户生态保护行为研究[J].生态经济,2016,32(8):180-185.
[21] 崔晓明,杨新军.旅游地农户生计资本与社区可持续生计发展研究:以秦巴山区安康一区三县为例[J].人文地理,2018,33(2):147-153.
[22] 张焱,罗雁,冯璐.滇南跨境山区农户生计资本的量表开发及因子分析[J].经济问题探索,2017,38(8):134-143.
[23] 伍艳.贫困山区农户生计资本对生计策略的影响研究：基于四川省平武县和南江县的调查数据[J].农业经济问题,2016,37(3):88-94.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01