PDF Download

[1]CHENG Simin,WANG Jijun,LI Maosen,et al.Analysis on the Evolutionary Process of Farmers’ Livelihood Strategy and the Agricultural Industry-Resources System Coupling Mechanism in De-Farming Regions——A Case Study of Zhifanggou Watershed[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(05):242-249.

Copy

Analysis on the Evolutionary Process of Farmers’ Livelihood Strategy and the Agricultural Industry-Resources System Coupling Mechanism in De-Farming Regions——A Case Study of Zhifanggou Watershed

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 25 Number of periods: 2018 05 Page number: 242-249 Column: Public date: 2018-09-06

Title:: Analysis on the Evolutionary Process of Farmers’ Livelihood Strategy and the Agricultural Industry-Resources System Coupling Mechanism in De-Farming Regions——A Case Study of Zhifanggou Watershed

Author(s):: CHENG Simin^1,3, WANG Jijun^1,2, LI Maosen², LI Yue², QIAO Mei²; 1. Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China;
2. Northwest A & F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China;
3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Keywords:: farmer; livelihood strategy; agricultural industry-resources system; coupling mechanism; de-farming regions

CLC:: F326.3

DOI:: -

Abstract:: The implementation of the Grain for Green Project has improved the regional ecological environment. The increased forest and grass resources have not been effectively utilized by the related industries. The contradiction between the agricultural industry and resources system in the de-farming regions has impeded the development of agriculture and economy. From the perspective of household livelihood strategy change, we can reveal the agricultural industry-resource system coupling mechanism and its action path, and then promote the benign coupling of agricultural industry-resource system. Based on the related research at home and abroad, this paper makes a theoretical analysis on the coupling mechanism of farmers’ livelihood strategy and agricultural industry-resources system in the de-farming regions, and selects the typical representative watershed, Zhifanggou Watershed, as an example. The results are shown as follows. (1) Farmers are the driving force on agricultural industry-resources coupling system and their livelihood strategies interact with the system coupling mechanism. The livelihood strategies are controlled by the livelihood capital and the agricultural industry-resources system coupling mechanism, the coupling mechanism serves the livelihood strategies. The main driving factors of them are livelihood capital, national policy and peasant household management concept. (2) Farmers’ livelihood strategies include natural livelihood strategy, extended livelihood strategy, diversified livelihood strategy, intensive livelihood strategy and migration livelihood strategy. The evolution in Zhifanggou Watershed has experienced the first four. Among them, the natural livelihood strategy is consistent with system coupling mechanism. The other three are coordinated with system coupling mechanism by and large. However, there are conflicts between some of the driving factors. (3) The current livelihood strategy in Zhifanggou Watershed is still intensive. The major problem is that a large number of forest and grass resources are not being used as well as resource endowment and national policy are not coupled effectively. Therefore, it is necessary to consider the farmers’ livelihood strategies and establish a benign coupling mechanism to promote the optimal allocation of resources for the efficient development of agriculture industry-resources system.

References:: [1] 卢宗凡.中国黄土高原生态农业[M].西安:陕西人民出版社,1993.
[2] 李奇睿,王继军,郭满才.基于结构方程模型的安塞县商品型生态农业系统耦合关系[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(16):240-247.
[3] Shackleton C M, Shackleton S E, Buiten E, et al. The importance of dry woodlands and forests in rural livelihoods and poverty alleviation in South Africa[J]. Forest Policy & Economics, 2007,9(5):558-577.
[4] 王继军,李慧,苏鑫,等.基于农户层次的陕北黄土丘陵区农业生态经济系统耦合关系研究[J].自然资源学报,2010,25(11):1887-1896.
[5] 李慧,王继军,郭满才.基于结构方程模型的黄土丘陵区商品型生态农业系统耦合关系分析[J].经济地理,2010,30(6):1005-1010.
[6] 苏鑫,王继军,郭满才,等.基于结构方程模型的吴起县农业生态经济系统耦合关系[J].应用生态学报,2010,21(4):937-944.
[7] 夏自兰,王继军,姚文秀,等.水土保持背景下黄土丘陵区农业产业-资源系统耦合关系研究水:基于农户行为的视角[J].中国生态农业学报,2012,20(3):369-377.
[8] 王成超,杨玉盛.基于农户生计策略的土地利用/覆被变化效应综述[J].地理科学进展,2012,31(6):792-798.
[9] 李翠珍,徐建春,孔祥斌.大都市郊区农户生计多样化及对土地利用的影响:以北京市大兴区为例[J].地理研究,2012,31(6):1039-1049.
[10] 刘倩楠.南方丘陵地区农户生计变化对农地利用的影响[D].武汉:华中师范大学,2014.
[11] 王成超,杨玉盛.基于农户生计演化的山地生态恢复研究综述[J].自然资源学报,2011,26(2):344-352.
[12] 苏磊,付少平.农户生计方式对农村生态的影响及其协调策略:以陕北黄土高原为个案[J].湖南农业大学学报:社会科学版,2011,12(3):47-54.
[13] 王跃生.家庭责任制、农户行为与农业中的环境生态问题[J].北京大学学报:哲学社会科学版,1999,36(3):43-50.
[14] 陈利顶,马岩.农户经营行为及其对生态环境的影响[J].生态环境学报,2007,16(2):691-697.
[15] 张贞,魏朝富,李萍,等.四川盆地丘陵区农户行为对耕地质量的影响[J].农业工程学报,2009,25(4):230-236.
[16] 朱晓雨,石淑芹,石英.农户行为对耕地质量与粮食生产影响的研究进展[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2014,24(11):304-309.
[17] 张芳芳,赵雪雁.我国农户生计转型的生态效应研究综述[J].生态学报,2015,35(10):3157-3164.
[18] 王成超.农户生计行为变迁的生态效应:基于社区增权理论的案例研究[J].中国农学通报,2010,26(18):315-319.
[19] 李小建,时慧娜.基于农户视角的农区发展研究[J].人文地理,2008,23(1):1-6.
[20] Jie F, Liang Y T, Tao A J, et al. Energy policies for sustainable livelihoods and sustainable development of poor areas in China[J]. Energy Policy, 2011,39(3):1200-1212.
[21] Nils P M, Peterson M J, Rai P T, et al. A household perspective for biodiversity conservation[J]. Journal of Wildlife Management, 2015,71(4):1243-1248.
[22] 杜娜,王继军,杨冰.纸坊沟流域农用地生态经济系统耦合关系研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(2):48-52.
[23] 王成超,杨玉盛.农户生计非农化对耕地流转的影响:以福建省长汀县为例[J].地理科学,2011,31(11):1362-1367.
[24] Kates R W, Clark W C, Corell R, et al. Sustainability science[J]. Science, 2001,292(5517):641-642.
[25] Glavovic B C, Boonzaier S. Confronting coastal poverty:Building sustainable coastal livelihoods in South Africa[J]. Ocean & Coastal Management, 2007,50(1/2):1-23.
[26] Ellis F, Bahiigwa G. Livelihoods and rural povery reduction in Uganda[J]. World Development, 2003,31(6):997-1013.
[27] Ellis F. Household strategies and rural livelihood diversification[J]. the Journal of Development Studies, 1998,35(1):1-38.
[28] Niehof A. The significance of diversification for rural livelihood systems[J]. Food Policy, 2004,29(4):321-338.
[29] Carter M R. Environment, technology, and the social articulation of risk in West African agriculture[J]. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 1997,45(3):557-590.
[30] 左停,王智杰.穷人生计策略变迁理论及其对转型期中国反贫困之启示[J].贵州社会科学,2011,261(9):54-59.
[31] 王继军,姜志德,连坡,等.70年来陕西省纸坊沟流域农业生态经济系统耦合态势[J].生态学报,2009,29(9):5130-5137.
[32] 李芬.黄土丘陵区纸坊沟流域农业生态安全评估[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2008.
[33] 王继军.黄土丘陵区纸坊沟流域农业生态经济系统耦合过程分析[J].应用生态学报,2009,20(11):2723-2729.
[34] 中国科学院西北水土保持研究所.黄土丘陵沟壑区水土保持型生态农业研究[M].西安:天则出版社,1990.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01