[1]HUA Jiqing,YE Changsheng.Urban Land Use Efficiency and Spatiotemporal Differentiation of Guangdong Province Based on DEA[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(04):283-288.
Copy
Urban Land Use Efficiency and Spatiotemporal Differentiation of Guangdong Province Based on DEA
Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume:
25
Number of periods:
2018 04
Page number:
283-288
Column:
Public date:
2018-06-13
- Title:
- Urban Land Use Efficiency and Spatiotemporal Differentiation of Guangdong Province Based on DEA
- Keywords:
- CCR model; super-efficiency DEA model; Malmquist index; urban land use efficiency; Guangdong Province
- CLC:
- F301.24
- DOI:
- -
- Abstract:
- In order to reveal the state of urban land use efficiency as well as the spatial and temporal differentiation characteristics in Guangdong Province, the evaluation index system of urban land use efficiency was constructed, the CCR model, super-efficiency DEA model, Malmquist index and other methods were used to analyze urban land use efficiency in Guangdong Province from 2006 to 2015. The results showed that the average value of urban land use efficiency in Guangdong Province from 2006 to 2015 was 0.943, the efficiency was at the high level. The average of Malmquist productivity change index was 0.982, the efficiency decreased slightly; the spatial difference of urban land use efficiency in Guangdong Province was significant, the urban land use efficiencies of Foshan, Dongguan, Shenzhen, Shanwei, Meizhou, Yunfu, Yangjiang, Maoming and Jieyang was the highest, efficiencies of Zhaoqing, Guangzhou, Zhuhai, Zhanjiang, Heyuan and Chaozhou ranked the second, while the efficiencies of Jiangmen, Zhongshan, Qingyuan, Huizhou, Shaoguan and Shantou were relatively low. In general, the change of urban land use efficiency of each city in Guangdong Province from 2006 to 2015 was not significant. Through the projection results of 7 non-DEA effective cities of Guangdong Province in 2015, it was found that, on the whole, fixed assets investment in municipal district was more redundant in terms of input, while insufficient output was differed. Striving to achieve the rational allocation of urban land resources, reducing the redundant factors, and increasing urban land use output are the paths of improving urban land use efficiency.
- References:
-
[1] 刘彦随,邓旭升,甘红.我国城市土地利用态势及优化对策[J].重庆建筑大学学报,2005,27(3):1-4.
[2] 梁流涛,赵庆良,陈聪.中国城市土地利用效率空间分异特征及优化路径分析:基于287个地级以上城市的实证研究[J].中国土地科学,2013,27(7):48-54.
[3] 叶晓敏.城市闲置土地的分布特征与形成机理研究:以杭州市主城区为例[D].杭州:浙江大学,2009.
[4] 张荣天,焦华富.长江经济带城市土地利用效率格局演变及驱动机制研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2015,24(3):387-394.
[5] 陈荣.城市土地利用效率论[J].城市规划汇刊,1995(4):28-33.
[6] 董黎明,冯长春.城市土地综合经济评价的理论方法初探[J].地理学报,1989,44(3):323-333.
[7] 黄和平,彭小琳.脱钩视觉下城市土地利用效率变化与提升策略:以南昌市为例[J].资源科学,2016,38(3):493-500.
[8] 张俊峰,张安录,董捷.武汉城市圈土地利用效率评价及时空差异分析[J].华东经济管理,2014,28(5):60-64.
[9] 钟静婧,毛宏云.鄱阳湖生态经济区土地利用效率测度及其提升路径分析[J].江西师范大学学报:自然科学版,2015,39(6):652-657.
[10] 刘传明,李红,贺巧宁.湖南省土地利用效率空间差异及优化对策[J].经济地理,2011,30(11):1890-1896.
[11] 杨海泉,胡毅,王秋香.2001-2012年中国三大城市群土地利用效率评价研究[J].地理科学,2015,35(9):1096-1100.
[12] 杨清可,段学军,叶磊,等.基于SBM-Undesirable模型的城市土地利用效率评价:以长三角地区16城市为例[J].资源科学,2014,36(4):712-721.
[13] 吴得文,毛汉英,张小雷,等.中国城市土地利用效率评价[J].地理学报,2011,66(8):1111-1121.
[14] 吕荣杰.城镇化进程中的城市土地利用效率研究[D].西安:西安建筑科技大学,2011.
[15] 王雨晴,宋戈.城市土地利用综合效益评价与案例研究[J].地理科学,2006,26(6):7143-7148.
[16] 李小宁.统筹城乡发展下的高陵县土地利用效率研究[D].西安:西安建筑科技大学,2011.
[17] 于淼.数据、模型与决策[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2002.
[18] 夏后学,陈方,支玲,等.基于超效率DEA方法的江苏省城镇化发展差异评价[J].中国农业资源与区划,2014,35(2):6-10.
[19] 龚艳,郭峥嵘.江苏旅游业发展效率及对策研究:基于超效率DEA和Malmquist指数分析[J].华东经济管理,2014(4):7-12.
[20] 赵伟,马瑞永,何元庆.全要素生产率变动的分解:基于Malmquist生产力指数的实证分析[J].统计研究,2005(7):37-42.
[21] 林坚,马珣.中国城市群土地利用效率测度[J].城市问题,2014,226(5):9-14.
[22] Yeh A G O, Wu Fulong. The new land development process and urban development in Chinese cities[J]. International Journal of Urban and Regional Studies, 1996,20(2):330-353.
- Similar References:
Memo
-
Last Update:
1900-01-01