PDF Download

[1]HE Huidan,ZHU Jingbin,WEI Yaxi,et al.Response of Soil Water Storage to Fencing Measures in the Alpine Meadow[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(03):210-216,223.

Copy

Response of Soil Water Storage to Fencing Measures in the Alpine Meadow

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 25 Number of periods: 2018 03 Page number: 210-216,223 Column: Public date: 2018-04-10

Title:: Response of Soil Water Storage to Fencing Measures in the Alpine Meadow

Author(s):: HE Huidan^1,2, ZHU Jingbin^1,2, WEI Yaxi^1,2, LI Hongqin^1,3, YANG Yongsheng^1,3, LI Yingnian^1,3; 1. Northwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining 810001, China;
2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
3. Key Laboratory of Adaptation and Evolution of Plateau Biota, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining 810001, China

Keywords:: alpine meadow; soil water storage; fencing; soil bulk density

CLC:: S152.7⁺1

DOI:: -

Abstract:: Taking the alpine meadow in Maqin of Qinghai Province as research site, we analyzed the temporal variation characteristics, soil water-holding capacity and its influencing factors of soil water storage content under the condition of fencing measures. The results are as follows. The changing trend about the soil water storage of sample area of fencing and grazing is consistent with precipitation, and it can be divided into freezing stage agglomeration, fluctuations in consumption and accumulation period. In the growing period of plant from May 1 to September 28, the average soil water storages in the depth of 0-40 cm of fencing and grazing are 112.58 mm and 96.26 mm, respectively, the water storage under fencing is greater than that under grazing. Soil water storage was positively correlated with green body(p<0.05), underground biomass(p<0.01), was not correlated with organic carbon density(p>0.05); and was significantly negatively correlated with soil bulk density(p<0.01). Soil water storage has different changes in the vertical direction and it is higher in the upper layer than the deeper layer. The average soil bulk density decreased by 11 percent after fencing in the depth of 0-40 cm. After 11 years fencing in alpine meadow, the soil saturated water holding capacity, capillary water holding capacity and field capacity increased by 6%, 9% and 11%, respectively, and on rise rates were 1.03 mm/year, 1.37 mm/year and 1.37 mm/year, repectivel. It indicates that, to some extent, fencing can increase the alpine meadow soil water-holding capacity.

References:: [1] 王文颖,王启基,王刚.高寒草甸土地退化及其恢复重建对土壤碳氮含量的影响[J].生态环境,2006,15(2):362-366.
[2] 李媛媛,董世魁,李小艳,等.围栏封育对黄河源区退化高寒草地植被组成及生物量的影响[J].草地学报,2012,20(2):275-279.
[3] 刘纪远,徐新良,邵全琴.近30年来青海三江源地区草地退化的时空特征[J].地理学报,2008,63(4):364-376.
[4] 邵全琴,樊江文.三江源区生态系统综合监测与评估[M].北京:科学出版社,2012:447-563.
[5] 何念鹏,韩兴国,于贵瑞.长期封育对不同类型草地碳贮量及其固持速率的影响[J].生态学报,2011,31(15):4270-4276.
[6] Wu G L, Liu Z H, Zhang L, et al. Long-term fencing improved soil properties and soil organic carbon storage in an alpine swamp meadow of western China[J]. Plant & Soil, 2010,332(1/2):331-337.
[7] Bilotta G S, Brazier R E, Haygarth P M. The impacts of grazing animals on the quality of soils, vegetation, and surface waters in intensively managed grasslands[J]. Advances in Agronomy, 2007,94:237-280.
[8] 范月君,侯向阳,石红宵,等.封育与放牧对三江源区高寒草甸植物和土壤碳储量的影响[J].草原与草坪,2012,32(5):41-46.
[9] 徐翠,张林波,杜加强,等.三江源区高寒草甸退化对土壤水源涵养功能的影响[J].生态学报,2013,33(8):2388-2399.
[10] 周印东,吴金水,赵世伟,等.子午岭植被演替过程中土壤剖面有机质与持水性能变化[J].西北植物学报,2003,23(6):895-900.
[11] 周华坤,赵新全,赵亮,等.高山草甸垂穗披碱草人工草地群落特征及稳定性研究[J].中国草地学报,2007,29(2):13-25.
[12] 中国土壤学会农业化学专业委员会.土壤农业化学常规分析方法[M].北京:科学出版社,1984.
[13] 刘晓琴,吴启华,李红琴,等.不同封育年限高寒草甸植被/土壤碳密度及净生态系统CO₂交换量的比较[J].冰川冻土,2013,35(4):848-856.
[14] 李红琴,乔小龙,张镒锂,等.封育对黄河源头玛多高寒草原水源涵养的影响[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(1):195-200.
[15] 吴启华,毛绍娟,刘晓琴,等.牧压梯度下高寒杂草类草甸土壤持水能力及影响因素分析[J].冰川冻土,2014,36(3):590-598.
[16] 王洁,贾文雄,赵珍,等.祁连山北坡草甸草原地上生物量与土壤理化性质的关系[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(1):36-43.
[17] 刘安花,李英年,张法伟,等.高寒矮嵩草草甸植物生长季土壤水分动态变化规律[J].干旱区资源与环境,2008,22(10):125-130.
[18] 张社奇,王国栋,时新玲,等.黄土高原油松人工林地土壤水分物理性质研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,2005,23(1):60-64.
[19] Wu G L, Li Z H, Zhang L, et al. Effects of artificial grassland establishment on soil nutrients and carbon properties in a black-soil-type degraded grassland[J]. Plant and Soil, 2010,333(1/2):469-479.
[20] 徐翠,张林波,杜加强,等.三江源高寒草甸退化对土壤水源涵养功能的影响[J].生态学报,2013,33(8):2388-2399.
[21] Su X K, Wu Y, Dong S K, et al. Effects of grassland degradation and re-vegetation on carbon and nitrogen storage in the soils of the Headwater Area Nature Reserve on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, China[J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2015,12(3):582-591.
[22] 孙宗玖,安沙舟,马金昌.围栏封育对草原植被及多样性的影响[J].干旱区研究,2007,24(5):669-674.
[23] Eldridge D J, Wang L, Ruiz-Colmenero M. Shrub encroachment alters the spatial patterns of infiltration[J]. Ecohydrology, 2015,8(1):83-93.
[24] 李建兴,何炳辉,梅雪梅,等.紫色土区坡耕地不同种植模式对土壤渗透性的影响[J].应用生态学报,2013,24(3):725-731.
[25] 赵中秋,蔡运龙,付梅臣,等.典型喀斯特地区土壤退化机理探讨:不同土地利用类型土壤水分性能比较[J].生态环境,2008,17(1):393-395.
[26] Leung A K, Garg A, Coo J L, et al. Effects of the roots of Cynodon dactylon and Schefflera heptaphylla on water infiltration rate and soil hydraulic conductivity[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2015,29(15):3342-3354.
[27] 何晴波,赵凌平,白欣,等.封育和放牧对典型草原地上植被的影响[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(4):247-251.
[28] 郭泺,夏北成,倪国祥.不同森林类型的土壤持水能力及其环境效应研究[J].中山大学学报,2005,44(4):327-330.
[29] 马宗泰.三江源北部天然草地土壤水分动态变化规律[J].安徽农业科学,2009,37(8):3619-3620.
[30] 白晓,张兰慧,王一博,等.祁连山区不同土地覆被类型下土壤水分变异特征[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(2):17-25.
[31] 候琼,王英舜,杨泽龙,等.基于水分平衡原理的内蒙古典型草原土壤水动态模型研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,2011,29(5):197-203.
[32] Schenk H. Vertical vegetation structure below:Scaling from root to globe[J]. Progress in Botany, 2005,66(2):341-373.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01