PDF Download

[1]HOU Yule,ZHAO Jingbo.Analysis of Drought Disasters in Linfen Region During the Period from 1840 to 1949[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(04):384-388.

Copy

Analysis of Drought Disasters in Linfen Region During the Period from 1840 to 1949

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 24 Number of periods: 2017 04 Page number: 384-388 Column: Public date: 2017-08-28

Title:: Analysis of Drought Disasters in Linfen Region During the Period from 1840 to 1949

Author(s):: HOU Yule¹, ZHAO Jingbo^2,3; 1. Aba Teachers College, Wenchuan, Sichuan 623002, China;
2. College of Tourism and Environment Science, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710062, China;
3. Center for Historical Environment and Socio-Economic Development in Northwest China, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710075, China

Keywords:: drought disaster; the late Qing Dynasty and the Republic of China; Linfen region

CLC:: P426.616

DOI:: -

Abstract:: For the study of flood change rule and the relationship with climate change, restoring historical period climate characteristics in Linfen region, through the statistics of the historical data of Linfen City, using the method of mathematical statistics, we analyze frequency of drought disasters, grade sequence characteristics, seasonal and internal variations and the cause during the period from 1840 to 1949. The results show that it happened recorded a total of 54 times, about 2 years per one time, above class Ⅱ proportion was 66.7%, and the drought than half of the total number of drought, it shows that drought damage is serious in the 110 years. The drought frequency of late Qing Dynasty is about 19 % higher than the Republic of China, the level Ⅲ drought is especially significant. They belong to the more drought seasons, and the level Ⅳ drought is relative larger. Most drought season is the whole year drought, spring-to-summer continuous drought, summer drought. Heavy drought and major drought indicate annual precipitation is mostly less than 332.7 mm. The dry cold climate, warm dry climate, El Nino phenomenon and other extreme weather events are background of frequent drought climate. The drastically reduced precipitation is the main reason for the big drought. The prominent contradiction between human and land, land to carry at the forest on the nature of development also contributed to the frequent drought and severe floods.

References:: [1] 张丽花,延军平,刘栎杉.山西气候变化特征与旱涝灾害趋势判断[J].干旱区资源与环境,2013,27(5):120-125.
[2] 张春林,赵景波,牛俊杰.山西黄土高原近50年来气候暖干化研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2008,22(4):70-74.
[3] 李芬,张建新,郝智文,等.山西降水与ENSO的相关性研究[J],地理学报,2015,70(3):420-430.
[4] 张庆云.1880年以来华北降水及水资源的变化[J].高原气象,1999,18(4):486-495.
[5] 临汾市志编纂委员会.《临汾市志》[M].北京:中华书局,2014.
[6] 王巧霞,史海平,孙悦.临汾市近48年气候变化规律研究析[J].山西师范大学学报:自然科学版,2003,17(4):88-92.
[7] 张德二.中国三千年气象记录总集[M].南京:江苏教育出版社,2004.
[8] 闵祥鹏.中国灾害通史[M].郑州:郑州大学出版社出版,2009.
[9] 张杰.山西自然灾害史年表[M].太原:山西省地方志编撰委员会办公室,1988.
[10] 温克刚.中国气象灾害大典·山西卷[M].北京:气象出版社,2005.
[11] 山西省水利厅编撰.汾河志[M].太原:山西人民出版社,2006.
[12] 山西省史志研究院.山西通志[M].北京:中华书局,1998.
[13] 襄汾县志编纂委员会.襄陵县志[M].北京:方志出版社,1986.
[14] 汾西县地方志编纂委员会.汾西县志[M].北京:方志出版社,1997.
[15] 吕晓虎,赵景波.泾河流域明代干旱灾害与成因研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2009,23(12):87-92.
[16] 满志敏.光绪三年北方大旱的气候背景[J].复旦学报:社会科学版,2000(6):28-35.
[17] 董安祥,柳媛普,李晓苹,等.黄河流域1922-1932年特大旱灾的特点及其影响[J].干旱气象,2010,28(3):270-278.
[18] 安维雅,曹新宇,刘希付.临汾方志传记中的灾害体验1600-1900[J].清史研究,2009(1):1-9.
[19] 奚秀梅,赵景波.鄂尔多斯高原地区清代旱灾与气候特征[J].地理科学进展,2012,31(9):1180-1185.
[20] 张慧慧,赵景波,孟万忠.鄂尔多斯高原西南部清代旱灾研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2014,28(8):132-137.
[21] 孟万忠,王尚义. ENSO事件与山西气候的关系[J].中国沙漠,2011,33(1):258-264.
[22] 田庆春,周汶.临汾市近60年来气候变化特征分析[J].山西师范大学学报:自然科学版,2015,29(3):98-102.
[23] 刘毅,杨宇.历史时期中国重大自然灾害时空分异特征[J].地理学报,2012,67(3):291-299.
[24] 徐娟,魏明建.华北地区百年气候变化规律分析[J].首都师范大学学报:自然科学版,2006(27),4:79-85.
[25] 程延江.山西气象志[M].太原:山西省地方志编撰委员会办公室,1985.
[26] 侯春燕.山西人口数量变迁及思考[J].沧桑,1998(12):30-34.
[27] 王尚义,张慧芝.明清时期汾河流域生态环境演变与民间控制[J].民俗研究,2006(3):126-138.
[28] 马淑苗,赵景波.厄尔尼诺/拉尼娜事件对山西省南部地区气候的影响[J].水土保持通报,2012,32(4):106-111.
[29] 张慧芝.明清时期汾河流域经济发展与环境变迁研究[D].西安:陕西师范大学,2005.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01