PDF Download

[1]WEI Zihan,WEI Zhanmin,LI Chunqiang,et al.Effects of Different Irrigation Methods on Maize Plant Growth Parameters and Yield[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(03):183-187.

Copy

Effects of Different Irrigation Methods on Maize Plant Growth Parameters and Yield

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 24 Number of periods: 2017 03 Page number: 183-187 Column: Public date: 2017-06-28

Title:: Effects of Different Irrigation Methods on Maize Plant Growth Parameters and Yield

Author(s):: WEI Zihan^1,2, WEI Zhanmin², LI Chunqiang³, BIAN Xinyang¹, LI Zhihong¹; 1. Kingland Mu He Water-Saving Equipment Limited Company, Chifeng, Inner Mongolia 024500, China;
2. College of Water Conservancy and Civil Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China;
3. Inner Mongolia Fangyuan Construction Engineering Limited Company, Chifeng, Inner Mongolia 024000, China

Keywords:: irrigation methods; maize; plant growth parameters; yield

CLC:: S275

DOI:: -

Abstract:: In order to explore the effects of different water saving irrigation methods on maize plant growth parameters and yield, three water-saving irrigation methods of low pressure pipe irrigation, drip irrigation under film and sprinkler irrigation were chosen in Tongliao City of Inner Mongolia. And under the same irrigation quota in the whole growth period, we observed soil moisture change, plant height, stem diameter, leaf area index, chlorophyll content, biomass, plant grain weight of maize and so on in the whole growth period. The results showed as the following. Different irrigation times had great effect on soil moisture content under the same irrigation quota, which affected crop growth. Effects of different water-saving irrigation methods on maize plant growth and yield were also significant. In the whole growth period, maize biomass of drip irrigation under film mulch was higher than that of sprinkler irrigation, that of sprinkler irrigation was higher than that of low pressure pipe irrigation, that of drip irrigation under film mulch was 46.74% higher than that of sprinkler irrigation and 98.81% higher than that of low pressure pipe irrigation, that of sprinkler irrigation was 35.49% higher by than that of low pressure pipe irrigation. The actual production of drip irrigation under film mulch was 2.85% greater than that of sprinkler irrigation, and 7.83% greater than that of low pressure pipe irrigation, that of sprinkler irrigation is 4.84% greater than that of low pressure pipe irrigation. In general, the three irrigation methods, drip irrigation under film was the best, followed by sprinkler irrigation, and the low pressure pipe irrigation came next.

References:: [1] 黄季焜,斯·罗泽尔.迈向21世纪的中国粮食经济[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1998:5-13.
[2] 裴源生,于福亮,罗琳.21世纪初期中国灌溉发展战略[J].水利水电科技进展,2003,23(3):1-5.
[3] 何玲.低压管灌在水田灌溉中应用研究[J].农业工程,2012,2(10):36-37.
[4] 张航,李久生.华北平原春玉米生长和产量对滴灌均匀系数及灌水量的响应[J].农业工程学报,2011,27(11):176-182.
[5] 王迪,李久生,饶敏杰.喷灌田间小气候对作物蒸腾影响的田间试验研究[J].水利学报,2007,38(4):427-432.
[6] 李英,马兴祥,王鹤龄,等.不同灌溉方式对玉米生物量的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2014,42(1):64-66.
[7] 王延宇,王鑫,赵淑梅,等.玉米各生长期土壤水分与产量关系的研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,1998,16(1):100-105.
[8] 张岁岐,周小平,慕自新,等.不同灌溉制度对玉米根系生长及水分利用效率的影响[J].农业工程学报,2009,25(10):1-6.
[9] 蔡红光,袁静超,闫孝贡,等.不同灌溉方式对春玉米根系分布、养分累积及产量的影响[J].玉米科学,2014,22(4):109-113.
[10] 李铁男,李美娟,王大伟.不同灌溉方式对玉米生物学效应影响研究[J].节水灌溉,2011(10):24-25,28.
[11] 朱林,许兴.植物水分利用效率的影响因子研究综述[J].干旱地区农业研究,2005,23(6):204-209.
[12] 王希群,马履一,贾忠奎,等.叶面积指数的研究和应用进展[J].生态学杂志,2005,24(5):537-541.
[13] Delecolle R, Maas S J, Guerif M, et al. Remote sensing and crop production models:present trends[J]. ISPRS J. Photogramm&Rem. Sens.1992,47(2/3):145-161.
[14] Wright D L, Rasmussen V P, Ramsey R D, et al. Canopy reflectance estimation of wheat nitrogen content for grain protein management[J]. GISci.&Rem. Sens.,2004,41(4):287-300.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01