PDF Download

[1]ZHANG Lulu,ZHENG Xinqi,CAI Yumei,et al.Assessment on Multi-functionality of Land Use Based on the Entire-Array-Polygon Indictor Method in Hu’nan Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(05):298-303,309.

Copy

Assessment on Multi-functionality of Land Use Based on the Entire-Array-Polygon Indictor Method in Hu’nan Province

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 23 Number of periods: 2016 05 Page number: 298-303,309 Column: Public date: 2016-10-28

Title:: Assessment on Multi-functionality of Land Use Based on the Entire-Array-Polygon Indictor Method in Hu’nan Province

Author(s):: ZHANG Lulu¹, ZHENG Xinqi¹, CAI Yumei², LYU Yongqiang¹; 1. School of Information Engineering, China University of Geosciences(Beijing), Beijing 100083, China;
2. China Land Surveying and Plan Institute, Beijing 100035, China

Keywords:: multifunctional land use; indicator system; entire-array-polygon indictor method; Hu’nan Province

CLC:: F301

DOI:: -

Abstract:: Assessment on multi-functionality of land use is the key problem in multifunctional land use. We designed an identification system of multifunctional land use according to the productive, social and ecological factors and used the entire-array-polygon indictor method to measure the state of land use functions in 1990, 2000 and 2010, as well as the change in Hu’nan Province. The results show that: (1) the entire-array-polygon indictor method has advantages in multifunctional land use assessment, which takes various factors into account and reduces the influence of subjective factors, so the entire-array-polygon indictor method improves the objectivity and scientificity of multifunctional land use assessment; (2) the total function of land use had dynamic change and had improved from 0.1 in 1990 to 0.22 in 2000 and 0.40 in 2010, the center of land use turned from agriculture production function in the former period to economic production and life function (LEF) in the latter period, and there was a gradually decrease in 20 years; (3) during the study period, except function decrease of food production, the economy production, transportation security, social security, employment security, residential function as well as ecological function were increasing on different degrees. It is suggested to stabilize and improve the ecological function, improve the food production function, employment security, social security, and promote coordinated development of the functions.

References:: [1] 王超.试论土地的结构与功能[J].地域研究与开发,1984(2):12-21.
[2] 陈传康.区域农业与农业经济[J].资源科学,1979(2):64-71.
[3] 甄霖,魏云洁,谢高地,等.中国土地利用多功能性动态的区域分析[J].生态学报,2010,30(24):6749-6761.
[4] Verburg P H, Van De Steeg J, Veldkamp A, et al. From land cover change to land function dynamics:a major challenge to improve land characterization[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2009,90(3):1327-1335.
[5] 杨雪,谈明洪.北京市耕地功能空间差异及其演变[J].地理研究,2014,33(6):1106-1118.
[6] 梁小英,顾铮鸣,雷敏,等.土地功能与土地利用表征土地系统和景观格局的差异研究:以陕西省蓝田县为例[J].自然资源学报,2014,29(7):1127-1135.
[7] 张晓平,朱道林,许祖学.西藏土地利用多功能性评价[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(6):185-194.
[8] 宋小青,欧阳竹.中国耕地多功能管理的实践路径探讨[J].自然资源学报,2012,27(4):540-551.
[9] Global Land Project. Science Plan and Implementation Strategy[R]. Stockholm:IGBP Secretariat, 2005.
[10] 张红旗,许尔琪,朱会义.中国"三生用地"分类及其空间格局[J].资源科学,2015,37(7):1332-1338.
[11] 陈睿山,蔡运龙,严祥,等.土地系统功能及其可持续性评价[J].中国土地科学,2011,25(1):8-15.
[12] Fleskens L, Duarte F, Eicher I. A conceptual framework for the assessment of multiple functions of agro-ecosystems:A case study of Trás-os-Montes olive groves[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2009,25(1):141-155.
[13] De Groot R S, Wilson M A, Boumans R M J. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services[J]. Ecological Economics, 2002,41(3):393-408.
[14] 刘沛,段建南,王伟,等.土地利用系统功能分类与评价体系研究[J].湖南农业大学学报:自然科学版,2010,36(1):113-118.
[15] 陈婧,史培军.土地利用功能分类探讨[J].北京师范大学学报:自然科学版,2005,41(5):536-540.
[16] 张洁瑕,陈佑启,姚艳敏,等.基于土地利用功能的土地利用分区研究:以吉林省为例[J].中国农业大学学报,2008,13(3):29-35.
[17] 甄霖,曹淑艳,魏云洁,等.土地空间多功能利用:理论框架及实证研究[J].资源科学,2009,31(4):544-551.
[18] 郭欢欢,李波,侯鹰.基于土地功能的土地资源承载力研究:以北京市海淀区为例[J].北京师范大学学报:自然科学版,2011,47(4):424-427.
[19] 吴琼,王如松,李宏卿,等.生态城市指标体系与评价方法[J].生态学报,2005,25(8):2090-2095.
[20] 周伟,曹银贵,乔陆印.基于全排列多边形图示指标法的西宁市土地集约利用评价[J].中国土地科学,2012,26(4):84-90.
[21] 程龙,董捷.基于全排列多边形综合图示指标法的武汉城市圈土地集约利用评价[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(1):183-187.
[22] 饶清华,邱宇,许丽忠,等.基于多目标决策的节能减排绩效评估[J].环境科学学报,2013,33(2):617-625.
[23] 王金朔,张庶.基于全排列图示指标法的城乡统筹发展评价:以海口市为例[J].江西农业学报,2014,26(3):139-142.
[24] 程龙,董捷.基于全排列多边形图示指标法的城乡建设用地增减挂钩适宜区评价[J].农业现代化研究,2013,34(4):472-476.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01