PDF Download

[1]ZHANG Long,SONG Ge,MENG Fei,et al.Spatiotemporal Variation Analysis of the Land Ecological Vulnerability in Ning’an City, Heilongjiang Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(02):133-137,143.

Copy

Spatiotemporal Variation Analysis of the Land Ecological Vulnerability in Ning’an City, Heilongjiang Province

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 21 Number of periods: 2014 02 Page number: 133-137,143 Column: Public date: 2014-04-28

Title:: Spatiotemporal Variation Analysis of the Land Ecological Vulnerability in Ning’an City, Heilongjiang Province

Author(s):: ZHANG Long^1,3, SONG Ge^1,2,3, MENG Fei^1,3, WANG Xue-wei^1,3; 1. College of Resources and Environment, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China;
2. Institute of Land Management, Northeast University, Shenyang 110819, China;
3. The Towns Development Research Center in Heilongjiang Province, Harbin 150030, China

Keywords:: land ecological vulnerability; spatiotemporal variation; Ning’an City

CLC:: X171

DOI:: -

Abstract:: The study on spatiotemporal variation of regional land ecological vulnerability contributes to using land resources and protecting the fragile eco-environment to local conditions, and has the important guiding significance for regional sustainable development. This paper took Ning’an City, Heilongjiang Province, as the study area to construct models to evaluate the vulnerability of landscape types and the regional land ecological vulnerability based on remote sensing of 1991, 2000 and 2010. Finally, ordinary Kriging interpolation was conducted to get the distribution map of the land ecological vulnerability in study area. The results showed in 1991, 2000 and 2010, the vulnerability degree of each landscape type followed the the order of farmland > construction land > other land uses > water area > grassland > forestland. Land ecological vulnerability index of the 61.7% of the sample areas increased, proportion of the middle-high vulnerability area increased, proportion of slightly vulnerability area decreased, the land ecological vulnerability exacerbated. The distribution map of the land ecological vulnerability showed that the vulnerability index was the highest in north-central part, extension gradually reducing and middle-high vulnerability area gradually expanded in the study area.

References:: [1] Roberts M G,杨国安.可持续发展研究方法国际进展:脆弱性分析方法与可持续生计方法比较[J].地理科学进展,2003,22(1):11-21.
[2] 徐广才,康慕谊,贺丽娜,等.生态脆弱性及其研究进展[J].生态学报,2009,29(5):2578-2588.
[3] Bawa K S, Joseph G, Setty S. Poverty, biodiversity and institutions in forest-agriculture ecotones in the Western Ghats and Eastern Himalaya ranges of India[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment,2007,121(3):287-295.
[4] M?rtberg U M, Balfors B, Knol W C. Landscape ecological assessment:A tool for integrating biodiversity issues in strategic environmental assessment and planning[J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2007,82(4):457-470.
[5] 胡宝清,金姝兰,曹少英,等.基于GIS技术的广西喀斯特生态环境脆弱性综合评价[J].水土保持学报,2004,18(1):103-107.
[6] 赵艳霞,刘欣,秦彦杰,等.河北省农牧交错区LUCC及其对生态脆弱性的影响[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(5):205-211.
[7] 张鑫,蔡焕杰,王化齐.民勤绿洲生态环境脆弱性模糊物元分析评价[J].干旱地区农业研究,2009,27(1):195-199.
[8] 赵冰,张杰,孙希化.基于GIS的淮河流域桐柏-大别山区生态脆弱性评价[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(3):135-138.
[9] 黄方,刘湘南,张养贞.GIS支持下的吉林省西部生态环境脆弱态势评价研究[J].地理科学,2003,23(1):95-100.
[10] 赵坷,饶鼓,王丽丽,等.西南地区生态脆弱性评价研究:以云南、贵州为例[J].地质灾害与环境保护,2004,15(2):35-42.
[11] 许倍慎,周勇,徐理,等.湖北省潜江市土地生态脆弱性时空分析[J].中国土地科学,2011,25(7):80-85.
[12] 张笑楠,王克林,张伟,等.桂西北喀斯特区域生态环境脆弱性[J].生态学报,2009,29(2):749-757.
[13] 卢远,苏文静,华璀.基于景观格局和生态敏感性的左江流域生态脆弱性分析[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(3):78-82,87.
[14] 孙丽娜,宋戈.松嫩高平原黑土区土地利用/覆被变化及其景观生态风险分析[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(1):148-158.
[15] 廖炜,李璐,吴宜进,等.丹江口库区土地利用变化与生态环境脆弱性评价[J].自然资源学报,2011,26(11):1879-1889.
[16] 黄莹,包安明,刘海隆,等.基于景观格局的新疆生态脆弱性综合评价研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,2009,27(3):261-266.
[17] 荆玉平,张树文,李颖.奈曼旗生态脆弱性及空间分异特征[J].干旱地区农业研究,2008,26(2):159-164.
[18] 刘纪远.国家资源环境遥感宏观调查与动态监测研究[J].遥感学报,1997,31(1):225-230.
[19] 高凤杰,张柏,王宗明,等.退耕还林对牡丹江区域生态环境脆弱性的影响研究[J].地球信息科学学报,2010,12(3):322-328.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01