[1]Gulnar Mahat,Wahap Halik,Hairensa Ismayil,et al.Researching Relations between Urbanization and Industrial Structure in Turpan City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(01):310-315.
Copy
Researching Relations between Urbanization and Industrial Structure in Turpan City
Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume:
21
Number of periods:
2014 01
Page number:
310-315
Column:
Public date:
2014-02-28
- Title:
- Researching Relations between Urbanization and Industrial Structure in Turpan City
- CLC:
- F291.1
- DOI:
- -
- Abstract:
- Documentation, chart law, theoretical analysis, correlation analysis, grey relational grade analysis and methods of case study were used to find out the relationships between urban development and industrial structure, and to provide some theoretical basis for the more reasonable and orderly improvement of urbanization of Turpan. Results showed that the overall level of urbanization of Turpan City which was currently lower than the average national urbanization level within 1962—2011 increasing year by year. During these period, the industrial structure transformed from the ‘the primary, the secondary, the tertiary’ to ‘the secondary, the tertiary, the primary’, and the proportion of the three major industries shifted from 8.8∶1.1∶5.7 to 13.1∶64.5∶22.4 in 2011. The changes of urbanization standards were negatively correlating with the primary industry, positively correlating with the secondary and the tertiary industries. The orders of correlation degree between the three industries and the improvement of the urbanization level were the secondary industries>the tertiary industries>the primary industries. The contribution rate of the secondary industry to level of urbanization was the highest, the secondary industry was the biggest driving power on the economic development of Turpan City, the tertiary industry was the second, and the primary industry was a minimum. Although the industrial structure of Turpan City shifted to a more optimized direction, that the function of the tertiary industry in urbanization improvement was not enough to limit the speeds of urbanization.
- References:
-
[1] 许学强,周一星,宁阅敏.城市地理学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1977:31-43.
[2] 廖进中.中国与世界同步-蛙声集[M].北京:中国发展出版社,2007.
[3] 西蒙·库兹涅茨.现代经济增长[M].北京:科学出版社,1991.
[4] 霍利斯·钱纳里,莫尔赛斯·赛尔昆.发展的格局1950-1970[M].北京:中国财政经济出版社,1989.
[5] 谢文蕙,邓卫.城市经济学[M].北京:清华大学出版社,1996:44-48.
[6] 程进,曾刚,方田红.新型城市化背景下我国新城区产业升级的困境与出路:以厦门市集美区为例[J].经济地理,2012,32(1):46-50.
[7] 李世杰,姚天祥,杨文新.试论产业结构演变与城市化的关系:以兰州市为例[J].地域研究与开发,2004,23(3):32-36.
[8] 侯红蕊,段志勇.西安市城市化水平与人均三产产值比重的相关分析[J].地下水,2011,36(6):187-189.
[9] 刘艳军,李诚固.东北地区产业结构演变的城市化响应机理与调控[J].地理学报,2009,64(2):153-166.
[10] 黄向梅,夏海勇.人口城市化与经济增长产业结构间的动态关系:以江苏省为例[J].城市问题,2012,202(5):59-64.
[11] 温江,熊黑钢,常春华.新疆主要城市城市化水平及其发展对策[J].干旱区资源与环境,2006,20(4):102-107.
[12] 杨德刚,李秀萍,韩剑萍.新疆城市化过程及机制分析[J].干旱区地理,2003,26(1):50-55.
[13] 周玄德,孜比布拉·司马义.吐鲁番市城市化与生态环境动态分析[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(1):159-161.
[14] 边学芳,吴群,刘玮娜.城市化与中国城市土地利用结构的相关分析[J].资源科学,2005,27(3):73-78.
[15] 藏波,杨庆媛,鲁春阳.城市化与产业结构关系的研究:以重庆为例[J].现代城市研究,2009(7):70-74.
[16] 徐建华.计量地理学[M].北京:高等出版社,2006:47-52.
[17] 韩燕,胡强.基于灰色关联的我国人口就业结构产业结构与城市化水平研究[J].西北人口,2012,3(33):121-122.
[18] 孙文生.经济预测方法[M].北京:中国农业大学出版杜,2005.
[19] 孟祥林.城市化进程研究:时空背景下城市、城市群的发展及其影响因素的经济学分析[D].北京:北京师范大学,2004.
[20] 阿尔斯朗·马木提,德村志成.吐鲁番市旅游开发状况实证研究[J].西南民族大学学报:人文社科版,2007,196(12):204-206.
[21] 刘艳军,李诚固,李如生.区域产业结构演变的城市化响应机理研究[J].人文地理,2008,5(35):74-77.
[22] 陈柳钦.论城市化发展的动力机制:从产业结构转移与发展的视角来研究[J].现代经济探讨,2005(1):10-15.
[23] 周心琴.区域产业结构调整与城市化响应研究:以重庆市为例[J].池州学院学报,2009,2(6):47-51.
[24] 杨万钟.经济地理学导论[M].华东师大出版社,1994:42-45.
[25] 林玲.城市化与经济发展[M].武汉:湖北人民出版社,1995:15-32.
[26] 杨兴.吐鲁番地区产业结构分析及优化研究[D].乌鲁木齐:新疆师范大学,2009.
- Similar References:
Memo
-
Last Update:
1900-01-01