[1]FANG Shi-ming,YI Ping.Evaluation on Implementation Benefits of Geopark Planning[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(01):299-304,309.
Copy
Evaluation on Implementation Benefits of Geopark Planning
Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume:
21
Number of periods:
2014 01
Page number:
299-304,309
Column:
Public date:
2014-02-28
- Title:
- Evaluation on Implementation Benefits of Geopark Planning
- Keywords:
- geopark planning; implementation benefits evaluation; effective-functions comprehensive evaluation; coordination degree analysis; Songshan
- CLC:
- TU986;X37
- DOI:
- -
- Abstract:
- Evaluation on implementation benefits is an important component of implementation and management for geopark planning, and it is of great significance to improve the planning revision and guide the planning implements scientifically and effectively. Methods of documentation, expert consultation and analytic hierarchy process were employed, indicator system framework of implementation benefit evaluation for geopark planning was established from three subsystems, which included economic benefits, social benefits and ecological benefits, and the weight of the indicator system was determined. Based on the method of effective-functions comprehensive evaluation, we evaluated the implementation benefits of current planning quantitatively, and development coordination degree of planning implementation benefits was analyzed for Songshan Global Geopark in He’nan province. The results showed that the current planning had been effectively and successfully implemented and produced significant economic benefits and favorable social benefits. Owing to unreasonable management system and the absence of sustainable development ideas, ignoring the ecological and environmental protection, the regional ecological environment was consequentially destroyed to a certain extent during the process of planning implementation, and brought low ecological benefits. The new geopark planning should establish sustainable tourism development mode, coordinate the relationship among the resource development and utilization, tourism development and ecological environment protection, both attach importance to the growth of the economic and social benefits, and pay attention to the improvement of the ecological benefits in order to achieve the synchronous promotion and optimization development of economic, social and ecological benefits.
- References:
-
[1] 赵逊,赵汀.中国地质公园地质背景浅析和世界地质公园建设[J].地质通报,2003,22(8):620-630.
[2] 王同文,田明中.地质公园可持续发展模式创新研究[J].资源开发与市场,2007,23(1):62-64.
[3] 赵小敏,郭熙.土地利用总体规划实施评价[J].中国土地科学,2003,17(5):35-40.
[4] 郑新奇,李宁,孙凯.土地利用总体规划实施评价类型及方法[J].中国土地科学,2006,20(1):21-26.
[5] 杜金锋,冯长春.当前中国土地利用总体规划实施评价中主要问题研究[J].中国土地科学,2008,22(10):74-80.
[6] 杨坡,何多兴,田永中,等.土地利用总体规划生态环境影响空间评价:以重庆市南川区为例[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(1):215-219.
[7] 陈银蓉,梅昀,代兵,等.城市土地利用总体规划实施评价研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2006,16(6):101-107.
[8] 龙瀛,韩昊英,谷一桢,等.城市规划实施的时空动态评价[J].地理科学进展,2011,30(8):967-977.
[9] 韦梦鹍.城市总体规划实施评估的内容探讨[J].城市发展研究,2010,17(4):54-58.
[10] 明开宇,雷国平,张慧,等.基于RS的城市居住用地集约利用评价:以大庆市龙凤区为例[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(1):202-205.
[11] 夏春云,严金明.土地利用规划实施评价的指标体系构建[J].中国土地科学,2006,20(2):19-23.
[12] 张琳,薛冰,鹿晨昱,等.基于AHP与GIS的城市可持续性测度与空间比较研究:以东北地区35市(州)为例[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(2):86-92.
[13] 官冬杰,苏维词.城市生态系统健康及其评价指标体系研究[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(5):70-73.
[14] 徐建华.现代地理学中的数学方法[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1994:115-119.
[15] 苏为华.多指标综合评价理论与方法问题研究[D].福建厦门:厦门大学,2002:44-46.
[16] 张雪松,张莹,瞿振华.基于效用函数综合评价法的土地利用总体规划实施评价研究:以京山县为例[J].华中师范大学学报:自然科学版,2008,42(4):631-635.
[17] 晏晓红.土地利用总体规划实施评价研究[D].武汉:武汉大学,2005.
[18] 宋戈,梁海鸥,林佳,等.黑龙江省垦区耕地利用综合效益评价及驱动力分析[J].经济地理,2010,30(5):835-840.
[19] 宋成舜,崔薛华,柯新利,等.城市土地集约利用综合效益演化研究:以湖北省咸宁市为例[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(1):230-234.
[20] 姜英朝.嵩山地质公园保护与可持续发展研究[D].北京:中国地质大学,2009.
[21] 谢萍.泰山地质公园地质遗迹保护与利用协调性研究[D].北京:中国地质大学,2006.
- Similar References:
Memo
-
Last Update:
1900-01-01