PDF Download

[1]LI Hui,JIANG Zhong-cheng,YIN Hui,et al.Study on Eco-compensation of Huixian Karst Wetland Based on Ecosystem Service Function Value[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(01):267-271.

Copy

Study on Eco-compensation of Huixian Karst Wetland Based on Ecosystem Service Function Value

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 21 Number of periods: 2014 01 Page number: 267-271 Column: Public date: 2014-02-28

Title:: Study on Eco-compensation of Huixian Karst Wetland Based on Ecosystem Service Function Value

Author(s):: LI Hui^1,2,3,4, JIANG Zhong-cheng^1,2, YIN Hui⁵, WANG Yue^3,4, LI Jian-hong⁶, YU Qi-wen^1,2; 1. Institute of Karst Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Guilin, Guangxi 541004, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Karst Ecosystem and Treatment of Rocky Desertification, CAGS, Guilin, Guangxi 541004, China;
3. School of Environment & Resources, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, Guangxi 541004, China;
4. Key Laboratory of Ecology of Rare and Endangered Species and Environmental Protection, Ministry of Education, China, Guilin Guangxi 541004, China

Keywords:: ecological service function; karst wetland; ecological compensation; Huixian

CLC:: X32

DOI:: -

Abstract:: Based on the basic principle and method of the willingness to pay (WTA) and willingness to pay (WTP) of condition survey, Huixian wetland surrounding residents willingness to accept and Guilin residents in urban areas of Huixian wetland ecological willingness payment have been investigated. Values of main ecological services of wetland ecosystem are calculated by using the market value method,the shadow price method, replacement cost method and contingent value method. The results show that: (1) annual karst wetland ecosystem service value is 512 484 929.2 yuan with an average of 39 180 yuan/(hm²·a); (2) based on the relation of ecological compensation and social development level, the most suitable value is 14 144.5 yuan/(hm²·a); (3) the most appropriate ecological compensation way should be cash compensation, policy compensation and intellectual and technical compensation.

References:: [1] 徐艳艳,徐艳东.国内外湿地研究进展和展望[J].河北渔业,2008(1):3-7,25.
[2] 吕宪国.湿地生态系统保护与管理[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2004:1-2.
[3] 李晖,蒋忠诚,马祖陆,等.桂林会仙岩溶湿地健康评价与补偿机制研究[J].中国水土保持,2013(1):61-64.
[4] 吴应科,莫源富,邹胜章.桂林会仙岩溶湿地的生态问题及其保护对策[J].中国岩溶,2006,25(1):85-88.
[5] 刘红梅,董双林,陆健健.湿地生态系统评估体系的方法学探讨[J].生态经济:经济版,2007(2):362-362.
[6] 谢高地,肖玉,鲁春霞.生态系统服务研究:进展、局限和基本范式[J].植物生态学报,2006,30(2):191-199.
[7] 蔡德所,马祖陆,赵湘桂,等.桂林会仙岩溶湿地近40年演变的遥感监测[J].广西师范大学学报:自然科学版,2009,27(2):111-117.
[8] 韦峰.桂林会仙喀斯特湿地生物多样性及保护研究[D].广西桂林:广西师范大学,2010.
[9] 辛琨.区域生态系统服务功能形成机制与评价方法研究[D].北京:中国科学院生态研究中心,2001.
[10] 陈鹏.厦门湿地生态系统服务功能价值评估[J].湿地科学,2006,4(2):101-107.
[11] 赵景柱,徐亚骏,肖寒,等.基于可持续发展综合国力的生态系统服务评价研究:13个国家生态系统服务价值的测算[J].系统上程理论与实践,2003,23(1):121-127.
[12] 陈仲新,张新时.中国生态系统效益的价值[J].科学通报,2000,45(1):17-22.
[13] 彭文甫,周介铭,罗怀良,等.城市土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值损益估算:以成都市为例[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(4):43-51.
[14] 王瑶.山东湿地生态系统生态功能评估及其生态补偿研究[D].济南:山东大学,2008.
[15] 倪才英,汪为青,曾珩,等.鄱阳湖退田还湖生态补偿研究(Ⅱ):鄱阳湖双退区湿地生态补偿标准评估[J].江西师范大学学报:自然科学版,2010,34(5):541-546.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 1900-01-01