Wang Dongli,Yu Baihe,Zhao Xiaoliang,et al.Soil Ecological Stoichiometric Characteristics Under Different Vegetation Types of Open-Pit Dump in Sandy Loess Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,31(01):61-69.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.01.040]
风沙黄土区排土场不同植被类型下土壤生态化学计量特征
- Title:
- Soil Ecological Stoichiometric Characteristics Under Different Vegetation Types of Open-Pit Dump in Sandy Loess Region
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2024)01-0061-09
- Keywords:
- Yellow River Basin; open-pit dump; vegetation restoration; soil improvement; ecological stoichiometry.
- 分类号:
- S158.3
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- [目的]准确评价风沙黄土区露天矿区排土场不同植被类型下土壤改良效益,并揭示其植被恢复的养分限制性,进而为该区生态重建与环境改善构建高效的植被恢复模式提供理论依据。[方法]选取鄂尔多斯武家塔排土场乔、灌、草3种植被类型的10种恢复模式的土壤为研究对象,以新排土为对照,开展其土壤有机碳、全氮和全磷与其化学计量特征及关系的研究。[结果]风沙黄土区排土场土壤有机碳、全氮、全磷含量变化分别为0.62～18.60 g/kg,0.09～0.36 g/kg和0.04～0.21 g/kg,其中乔、灌林地的土壤有机碳、全氮养分含量显著高于新排土(p≤0.05),乔木林地的全磷含量显著低于其他3种样地(p≤0.05); 在土层垂直剖面,3种植被类型的土壤养分均表现为表层富集性,灌木林地的土壤全氮含量在不同土层均表现最高,乔木林地土壤有机碳平均含量最高,草地的全磷平均含量最多。土壤C/N在不同植被类型间无显著差异(p>0.05),土壤C/P和N/P受植被类型的影响较大,均表现为乔木林地>灌木林地>草地>新排土; 在土层垂直剖面,C/N整体呈现增大的变化趋势,N/P先减小后增大的趋势。土壤有机碳与C/N,C/P,N/P均呈极显著正相关关系(p≤0.01); 土壤全氮与C/P,N/P呈极显著正相关关系(p≤0.01),土壤全磷则反之。乔木林地土壤N/P较高,植被生长受磷含量的限制; 草地、灌木林地土壤N/P较低,植被生长受氮含量的限制。[结论]在植被恢复初期先种植草灌改善土壤表层养分,并适当施加氮肥,随着土壤肥力的提高再逐步种植乔木,配施磷肥以增强复垦效果。
- Abstract:
- [Objective] This study aimes to accurately evaluate the soil improvement benefits and to reveal the nutrient limitations under different vegetation types in the open-pit dump in the sandy loess area, so as to provide a theoretical basis to construct an efficient vegetation restoration model for ecological reconstruction and environmental improvement in this area. [Methods] The soils from ten kinds of vegetation restoration modes, belonging to three vegetation types of forest, shrub, and grass were selected as study samples, while the soil from the newly dumped land was selected as control. The ecological stoichiometric characteristics of soil organic carbon, total nitrogen and total phosphorus and their relationships were studied. [Results] The values of soil organic carbon, total nitrogen, and total phosphorus for soil under different vegetation types of dump in sandy loess region varied between 0.62～18.60 g/kg, 0.09～0.36 g/kg and 0.04～0.21 g/kg, respectively. The values of soil organic carbon and total nitrogen in the forest land and shrub land were significantly greater than those in the newly dumped land(p≤0.05), and the values of total phosphorus in the arboreal land were significantly lower than those in the other three plots(p≤0.05). In the vertical section of soil layer, the soil nutrients of three types of planting cover enriched in the surface layer. The soil total nitrogen amount of shrub land was the highest in different soil layers, the mean soil organic carbon amount of arbor land was the highest, and the mean soil total phosphorus amount of grass land was the highest. There was no significant difference in soil C/N among different vegetation types(p>0.05). Soil C/P and soil N/P were greatly affected by vegetation types, and all of them showed the order: new soil dumping of arbor land>shrub land>grass land>new dump. In the vertical section of soil layer, soil C/N showed the increasing trend overall, and soil N/P firstly decreased and then increased with the increase of soil layer depth. Soil organic carbon was significantly positively correlated with soil C/N, C/P and N/P(p≤0.01). Soil total nitrogen was significantly positively correlated with soil C/P and N/P(p≤0.01), while soil total phosphorus was on the contrary. Soil N/P in arbor land was high, and vegetation growth was limited by the phosphorus amount. Soil N/P in grass land and shrub land was low, and vegetation growth was limited by the nitrogen amount. [Conclusion] It is suggested that grass and shrub should be planted at the early stage of vegetation restoration to improve soil surface nutrients; furthermore, nitrogen fertilizer should be applied appropriately. With the improvement of soil fertility, trees should be gradually planted and phosphorus fertilizer should be applied to enhance the reclamation effect
参考文献/References:
[1] 范英宏,陆兆华,程建龙,等.中国煤矿区主要生态环境问题及生态重建技术[J].生态学报,2003,23(10):2144-2152.
Fan Y H, Lu Z H, Cheng J L, et al. Major ecological and environmental problems and the ecological reconstruction technologies of the coal mining areas in China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2003,23(10):2144-2152.
[2] 吕春娟,白中科,秦俊梅,等.黄土区大型排土场岩土侵蚀特征研究:以平朔矿区排土场为例[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(4):233-236.
Lü C J, Bai Z K, Qin J M, et al. Research on the characteristics of rock and soil erosion of the large stackpile in loess area:Taking Opencast-mine Area of Pingshuo as an example[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2006,13(4):233-236.
[3] 张鹏,赵洋,黄磊,等.植被重建对露天煤矿排土场土壤酶活性的影响[J].生态学报,2016,36(9):2715-2723.
Zhang P, Zhao Y, Huang L, et al.2016. Effect of revegetation on soil extracellular enzyme activity in the dumping site of an open-pit coal mine inHeidaigou[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016,36(9):2715-2723.
[4] 白东晓,王晓,郭玉梅,等.露天开采煤矿水土流失防治对策及其效果:以武家塔煤矿为例[J].山西水土保持科技,2007(3):43-45.
Bai D X, Wang X, Guo Y M, et al. Control measures and effects of soil and water loss in open-pit mining in Wujiata coal mine[J]. Soil and Water Conservation Science and Technology in Shanxi, 2007(3):43-45.
[5] 王绍强,于贵瑞.生态系统碳氮磷元素的生态化学计量学特征[J].生态学报,2008,28(8):457-467.
Wang S Q, Yu G R. Ecological stoichiometry characteristics of ecosystem carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus element[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008,28(8):457-467.
[6] 曾德慧,陈广生.生态化学计量学:复杂生命系统奥秘的探索[J].植物生态学报,2005,29(6):141-153.
Zeng D H, Cheng G S. Ecological Stoichiometry: A science to explore the complexity of living systems[J]. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 2005,29(6):141-153.
[7] 赵一娉,曹扬,陈云明,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区森林生态系统生态化学计量特征[J].生态学报,2017,37(16):5451-5460.
Zhao Y P, Cao Y, Chen Y M, et al. Ecological stoichiometry in a forest ecosystem in the hilly-gully area of the Loess Plateau[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017,37(16):5451-5460.
[8] 王维奇,徐玲琳,曾从盛,等.河口湿地植物活体—枯落物—土壤的碳氮磷生态化学计量特征[J].生态学报,2011,31(23):134-139.
Wang W Q, Xu L L, Zeng C S, et al. Carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus ecological stoichiometric ratios among live plant-litter-soil systems inestuarine wetland[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011,31(23):7119-7124.
[9] 曾冬萍,蒋利玲,曾从盛,等.生态化学计量学特征及其应用研究进展[J].生态学报,2013,33(18):5484-5492.
Zeng D P, Jiang L L, Zeng C S, et al. Reviews on the ecological stoichiometry characteristics and its applications[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013,33(18):5484-5492.
[10] 马任甜,方瑛,安韶山,等.黑岱沟露天煤矿优势植物叶片及枯落物生态化学计量特征[J].土壤学报,2016,53(4):1003-1014.
Ma R T, Fang Y, An S S, et al. Ecological stoichiometric characteristics of leaves and litter of plants dominant in heidaigou opencast coal mining area[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2016,53(4):1003-1014.
[11] 王东丽,刘阳,郭莹莹,等.半干旱矿区排土场苜蓿恢复过程中土壤颗粒分形的演变特征[J].生态学报,2020,40(13):4585-4593.
Wang D L, Liu Y, Guo Y Y, et al. The fractal characteristics of soil particles during the restoration of medicago sativa in a semi-arid mining dump[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020,40(13):4585-4593.
[12] 刘瑞龙,杨万勤,吴福忠,等.川西亚高山/高山森林凋落物分解过程中土壤动物群落结构及其多样性动态[J].应用与环境生物学报,2014,20(3):499-507.
Liu R L, Yang W Q, Wu F Z, et al. Soil fauna community structure and diversity during foliar litter decomposition in the subalpinealpine forests of western Sichuan[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology, 2014,20(3):499-507.
[13] 胡宜刚,张鹏,赵洋,等.植被配置对黑岱沟露天煤矿区土壤养分恢复的影响[J].草业科学,2015,32(10):1561-1568.
Hu Y G, Zhang P, Zhao Y, et al. Effects of various vegetation patterns on soil nutrients recovery in Heid-aigou coal mine[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2015,32(10):1561-1568.
[14] 朱秋莲,邢肖毅,张宏,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区不同植被区土壤生态化学计量特征[J].生态学报,2013,33(15):4674-4682.
Zhu Q L, Xing X Y, Zhang H, et al. Soil ecological stoichiometry under different vegetation area on loess hillygully region[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013,33(15):4674-4682.
[15] 魏孝荣,邵明安.黄土高原沟壑区小流域坡地土壤养分分布特征[J].生态学报,2007,27(2):603-612.
Wei X R, Shao A M. The distribution of soilnutrients on sloping land in the gully region watershed of the Loess Plateau[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2007,27(2):603-612.
[16] 李鑫,曾全超,安韶山,等.黄土高原纸坊沟流域不同植物叶片及枯落物的生态化学计量学特征研究[J].环境科学,2015,36(3):1084-1091.
Li X, Zeng Q C, An S S, et al. Ecological stoichiometric characteristics in leaf and litter under different vegetation types of Zhifanggou watershed on the Loess Plateau, China[J]. Environmental Science, 2015,36(3):1084-1091.
[17] 彭少麟,刘强.森林凋落物动态及其对全球变暖的响应[J].生态学报,2002,22(9):1534-1544.
Peng S L, Liu Q. The Dynamics of forest litter and its responses to global warming[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2002,22(9):1534-1544.
[18] 马寰菲,解梦怡,胡汗,等.秦岭不同海拔森林土壤—植物—凋落物化学计量特征对土壤氮组分的影响[J].生态学杂志,2020,39(3):749-757.
Ma H F, Xie M Y, Hu H, et al. Effects of stoichiometric characteristics of soil-plant-litter on soil nitrogen components in different forests along an elevational gradient of Qinling Mountains[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2020,39(3):749-757.
[19] 赵彤,闫浩,蒋跃利,等.黄土丘陵区植被类型对土壤微生物量碳氮磷的影响[J].生态学报,2013,33(18):5615-5622.
Zhao T, Yan H, Jiang Y L, et al. Effects of vegetation types on soil microbial biomass C, N, P on the Loess Hilly Area[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013,33(18):5615-5622.
[20] 巩杰,陈利顶,傅伯杰,等.黄土丘陵区小流域植被恢复的土壤养分效应研究[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(1):93-96.
Gong J, Chen L D, Fu B J, et al. Effects of vegetation restoration on soil nutrient in a small catchment in Hilly Loess Area[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2005,19(1):93-96.
[21] 刘兴诏,周国逸,张德强,等.南亚热带森林不同演替阶段植物与土壤中N, P的化学计量特征[J].植物生态学报,2010,34(1):64-71.
Liu X Z, Zhou G Y, Zhang D Q, et al. N and P stoichiometry of plant and soil in lower subtropical forest successional series in southern China[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2010,34(1):64-71.
[22] 康冰,刘世荣,蔡道雄,等.南亚热带不同植被恢复模式下土壤理化性质[J].应用生态学报,2010,21(10):2479-2486.
Kang B, Liu S R, Cai D X, et al. Soil physical and chemical characteristics under different vegetation restoration patterns in China south subtropical area[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2010,21(10):2479-2486.
[23] 刘中奇.哈拉沟煤矿塌陷区植物群落特征及植被恢复技术研究[J].煤炭工程,2015,47(4):121-123,127.
Liu Z Q. Plant Community feature and research on artificial phytocoenosium configuration technology in halagou sand coal mine subsidence regions[J]. Coal Engineering, 2015,47(4):121-123,127.
[24] 刘兴锋,刘思凡,蒋龙,等.湘西北石漠化区不同植被类型土壤C, N, P的化学计量特征[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2019,39(2):72-78.
Liu X F, Liu S F, Jiang L, et al. Stoichiometric characteristics of soil C, N and P in different vegetation types in the rocky desertification area of northwestern Hunan Province[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2019,39(2):72-78.
[25] 黄昌勇.土壤学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000.
Huang C Y. Pedology[M]. Beijing:China Agriculture Press, 2000.
[26] 赵雅洁,张静,宋海燕,等.不同土壤厚度、水分和种植方式对喀斯特两种草本凋落物分解质量损失和化学计量特征的影响[J].生态学报,2018,38(18):6549-6558.
Zhao Y J, Zhang J, Song H Y, et al. Effects of different soil thickness, water and planting patterns on the litter mass loss and stoichiometry characteristics of two herbs in the karst regions[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018,38(18):6549-6558.
[27] 曾全超,李鑫,董扬红,等.黄土高原延河流域不同植被类型下土壤生态化学计量学特征[J].自然资源学报,2016,31(11):1881-1891.
Zeng Q C, Li X, Dong Y H, et al. Ecological stoichiometry of soils in the Yanhe Watershed in the Loess Plateau: The influence of different vegetation zones[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2016,31(11):1881-1891.
相似文献/References:
[1]郑明军,任于幽.谈水土保持在黄河流域经济持续发展中的地位和作用[J].水土保持研究,1998,5(03):10.
Zheng Mingjun,Ren Yuyou.Status and Role of Soil and Water Conservation in Economy Sustainable Development of the Yellow River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1998,5(01):10.
[2]张学成,王玲,乔永杰.黄河流域与长江流域生态环境建设的差异与重点[J].水土保持研究,2002,9(04):28.
ZHANG Xue-cheng,WANG Ling,QIAO Yong-jie.Differences and Key Points of Eco-environmental Construction in the Yellow River Basin and Yangtze River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2002,9(01):28.
[3]李道峰,田英,郝芳华.基于NDVI数据的黄河流域地表植被覆盖综合分类研究[J].水土保持研究,2003,10(04):88.
LI Dao-feng,TIAN Ying,HAO Fang-hua.NDVI Data Based Study on Complex Classification of Vegetation Cover of Yellow River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2003,10(01):88.
[4]赵帮元,李志华,郭玉涛,等.遥感在黄河流域水土保持监测中的应用[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(02):47.
ZHAO Bang-yuan,LI Zhi-hua,GUO Yu-tao,et al.The Applications of Remote Sensing in the Soil and Water Conservation Monitoring in the Yellow River Valley[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2004,11(01):47.
[5]李春晖,杨志峰.黄河流域地表水资源可再生性模糊综合评价[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(01):182.
LI Chun-hui,YANG Zhi-feng.Fuzzy Comprehensive Assessment of the Surface Water Resources Renewability in the Yellow River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2005,12(01):182.
[6]殷贺,王仰麟,彭建.黄河中上游地区半个世纪降水与温度变化分析[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(01):69.
YIN He,WANG Yang-lin,PENG Jian.Variation Analysis on Precipitation and Temperature in Upper Reach of Yellow River Basin from 1956 to 2006[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(01):69.
[7]师旭颖,郝芳华,林隆,等.黄河水电开发区域土地利用与景观格局分析[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(04):174.
SHI Xu-ying,HAO Fang-hua,LIN Long,et al.The Analysis of Land Use and Landscape Pattern in Hydropower Cascade Exploitation Region of the Yellow River[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(01):174.
[8]李万全.青海省黄河流域生态修复适宜性的初步探讨[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(06):68.
LI Wan-quan.A Tentative Discussion of Feasibility of Ecological Recovery Along the Yellow River Valley Within Qinghai[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2005,12(01):68.
[9]裴新富.黄河流域退耕还林途径研究[J].水土保持研究,2002,9(04):122.
PEI Xin-fu.Study on the Approach to Returning Farmland to Forests in the Yellow River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2002,9(01):122.
[10]董国涛,樊东,杨胜天,等.GPM与TRMM降雨数据在黄河流域适用性分析[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(03):81.
DONG Guotao,FAN Dong,YANG Shengtian,et al.Analysis on the Applicability of GPM and TRMM Precipitation Data in the Yellow River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(01):81.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2022-03-20 修回日期:2022-03-30
资助项目:中央引导地方科技发展专项资金计划项目“内蒙古矿区中蒙草药生态有机培植技术研发及示范基地建设”; 内蒙古自治区科技计划项目(201701024); 辽宁工程技术大学学科创新团队资助项目(LNTU20TD-01)
第一作者:王东丽(1986—),女,山西怀仁人,副教授,博士,主要从事生态恢复及荒漠化防治研究。E-mail:starhome0522@163.com
通信作者:赵晓亮(1981—),男,安徽淮北人,副教授,博士,主要从事矿山环境工程研究。E-mail:zhaoxiaoliang2008@126.com