ZHANG Chengyan,YANG Shaokang,DONG Xiaohua,et al.Research on Spatiotemporal Evolution and Influencing Factors of Ecological Environment Quality in the Upper Yangtze River Basin Based on RSEI Index[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(01):356-363.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.20220601.005]
基于RSEI指数的长江上游流域生态环境质量时空演变及影响因子研究
- Title:
- Research on Spatiotemporal Evolution and Influencing Factors of Ecological Environment Quality in the Upper Yangtze River Basin Based on RSEI Index
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2023)01-0356-08
- 关键词:
- 遥感生态环境指数; 长江上游流域; 时空特征; Google Earth Engine; 地理探测器
- Keywords:
- remote sensing ecological environment index; the upper reaches of the Yangtze River Basin; spatial and temporal characteristics; Google Earth Engine; geographic detector
- 分类号:
- TP79; X87; X826
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 为准确、及时地获取长江上游生态环境质量的变化趋势以及演变格局,基于Google Earth Engine(GEE)平台的MODIS系列遥感数据,通过计算长江上游流域生长季5—10月的绿度(NDVI)、湿度(WET)、热度(LST)及干度(NDSI)4个指标,采用主成分分析法(PCA)构建出遥感生态环境指数RSEI,并对长江上游流域生态环境进行评价。结果表明:(1)4个指标在第1主成分(PC1)上的平均贡献率为71%,表明依据这4个指标在长江上游流域构建RSEI是可行的;(2)长江上游流域RSEI整体呈现显著增加趋势(p<0.05),增加速率为1.1×10-3/a,具体可细分为两个阶段,分别是快速增长期(2000—2010年),其速率为5.9×10-3/a,以及增速放缓期(2010—2020年),其速率为3.9×10-3/a;(3)长江上游流域生态环境质量以优和良为主,且表现为南部比北部好及东部比西部好的空间分布格局;(4)2000—2010年流域生态环境质量改善明显,改善面积占34.7%,2010—2020年改善面积与退化面积接近,两者仅差1.3%左右;(5)2000—2020年长江上游流域RSEI变化趋势为正的像元面积占长江上游流域总面积的64.7%,其中显著退化的区域主要集中在嘉陵江下游地区;(6)生态环境质量主导自然影响因子在2000年为热度>绿度>湿度>干度; 2010年依次为绿度>热度>湿度>干度; 2020年依次为绿度>湿度>热度>干度。综上,利用GEE平台能快速、准确地监测长江上游流域生态环境质量,近21年来流域生态环境质量整体呈改善态势,但针对嘉陵江下游生态退化现象需要引起政府重视,尽快提出一系列生态修复措施,防止其生态环境进一步恶化。
- Abstract:
- In order to accurately and timely obtain the change trend and evolution pattern of ecological environment quality in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River, based on the MODIS series remote sensing data of the Google Earth Engine(GEE)platform, the greenness(NDVI), humidity(WET), heat(LST)and dryness(NDSI)of the upper Yangtze River basin during the growing season from May to October. Using principal component analysis(PCA)to construct a remote sensing ecological environment index RSEI to evaluate the ecological environment of the upper reaches of the Yangtze River. The results show that:(1)average contribution rate of the four indicators on the first principal component(PC1)is 71%, indicating that it is feasible to build RSEI in the upper Yangtze River basin based on these four indicators;(2)overall RSEI in the upper Yangtze River is a significant increase trend(p<0.05), and the increase rate is 1.1×10-3/a, which can be divided into two stages, namely the rapid growth period(2000—2010), with a rate of 5.9×10-3/a, and the slowdown period(2010—2020), the rate is 3.9×10-3/a;(3)ecological environment quality of the upper reaches of the Yangtze River is mainly and good, and the performance is better in the south than in the northeastern part has a better spatial distribution pattern than the western part;(4)from 2000 to 2010, the quality of the ecological environment in the watershed improved significantly, with an improved area accounting for 34.7. From 2010 to 2020, the improved area was close to the degraded area, and the difference between the two was only about 1.3%;(5)from 2000 to 2020, the area of pixels with a positive RSEI change trend in the upper Yangtze River accounted for 64.7% of the total area of the upper Yangtze River basin, and the areas with significant degradation mainly concentrated in the lower reaches of the Jialing River;(6)environment quality dominated natural influences factors in 2000 were heat>greenness>humidity>dryness; 2010, the greenness>heat>humidity>dryness; in 2020, the greenness>humidity>heat>dryness. In summary, the use of the GEE platform can quickly and accurately monitor the ecological environment quality of the upper reaches of the Yangtze River. In the past 21 years, the ecological environment quality of the basin shown an overall improvement trend. However, the ecological degradation phenomenon in the lower reaches of the Jialing River needs to be paid attention by the government, and a series of ecological restoration measures are proposed as soon as possible prevent further deterioration of its ecological environment.
参考文献/References:
[1] Xu M, Chen C, Deng X. Systematic analysis of the coordination degree of China's economy-ecological environment system and its influencing factor[J]. Environmental Science Pollution Research, 2019,26(29):29722-29735.
[2] 赵安周,刘宪锋,朱秀芳,等.2000—2014年黄土高原植被覆盖时空变化特征及其归因[J].中国环境科学,2016,36(5):1568-1578.
[3] Sfriso A, Facca C, Ghetti P F. Validation of the Macrophyte Quality Index(MaQI)set up to assess the ecological status of Italian marine transitional environments[J]. Hydrobiologia, 2009,617(1):117-141.
[4] Kim J H, Yeom D H, Kim J H, et al. New ecological health assessment approaches of an urban stream using molecular and physiological level biomarkers and bioindicators[J]. Animal Cells Systems, 2012,16(4):329-336.
[5] 姚晓洁,王霞,姚侠妹.基于RS技术的皖北城市阜阳市主城区热环境效应分析[J].生态学杂志,2021,40(10):3209-3303.
[6] 刘珞丹,李晶,柳彩霞,等.2000—2015年长江经济带植被覆盖时空变化特征及影响因素分析[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(6):330-336,347.
[7] 厉彦玲,朱宝林,王亮,等.基于综合指数法的生态环境质量综合评价系统的设计与应用[J].测绘科学,2005(1):89-91.
[8] 傅伯杰.中国各省区生态环境质量评价与排序[J].中国人口·资源与环境,1992(2):48-54.
[9] 姚尧,王世新,周艺,等.生态环境状况指数模型在全国生态环境质量评价中的应用[J].遥感信息,2012,27(3):93-98.
[10] Yang Z, Shi X, Su Q. Knowledge-based raster mapping approach to wetland assessment:a case study in Suzhou, China[J]. Wetlands, 2016,36(1):143-158.
[11] 徐涵秋.区域生态环境变化的遥感评价指数[J].中国环境科学,2013,33(5):889-897.
[12] 陈丽红,刘普幸,花亚萍.基于RSEI的疏勒河流域生态质量综合评价及其成因分析[J].土壤通报,2021,52(1):25-33.
[13] 何盈利,尤南山,崔耀平,等.2000年来中国生态状况时空变化格局[J].自然资源学报,2021,36(5):1176-1185.
[14] 李尧,袁红,罗建松,等.基于RSEI模型的生态环境质量评价研究[J].测绘与空间地理信息,2021,44(4):117-119,124.
[15] 吕大伟,蔡海生,张学玲,等.基于遥感生态指数的弋阳县生态安全格局构建及优化[J].农业现代化研究,2021,42(3):545-556.
[16] 潘洪义,李加安,张琴.基于RSEI的地震区生态环境质量恢复研究:以汶川县为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2021,30(3):745-757.
[17] 陈炜,黄慧萍,田亦陈,等.基于Google Earth Engine平台的三江源地区生态环境质量动态监测与分析[J].地球信息科学学报,2019,21(9):1382-1391.
[18] 张华,宋金岳,李明,等.基于GEE的祁连山国家公园生态环境质量评价及成因分析[J].生态学杂志,2021,40(6):1883-1894.
[19] Shan W, Jin X, Ren J, et al. Ecological environment quality assessment based on remote sensing data for land consolidation[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019,239:118126.
[20] 文传浩,张智勇,曹心蕊.长江上游生态大保护的内涵、策略与路径[J].区域经济评论,2021(1):123-130.
[21] 孙甲岚,雷晓辉,蒋云钟,等.长江流域上游气温、降水及径流变化趋势分析[J].水电能源科学,2012,30(5):1-4.
[22] 高燕俐,刘小刚,冷险险,等.基于主成分分析的广西省干旱时空格局[J].生态学报,2020,40(16):5591-5601.
[23] 徐光来,李爱娟,徐晓华,等.中国生态功能保护区归一化植被指数动态及气候因子驱动[J].植物生态学报,2021,45(3):213-223.
[24] 郑子豪,吴志峰,陈颖彪,等.基于Google Earth Engine的长三角城市群生态环境变化与城市化特征分析[J].生态学报,2021,41(2):717-729.
[25] 中国环境监测总站.生态环境状况评价技术规范(试行)[P].行业标准—环保,2006, HJ/T 192-2006:11 P.; A4.
[26] 王劲峰,徐成东.地理探测器:原理与展望[J].地理学报,2017,72(1):116-134.
[27] 排日海·合力力,昝梅,阿里木江·卡斯木.乌鲁木齐市生态环境遥感评价及驱动因子分析[J].干旱区研究,2021,38(5):1-16.
[28] 胡晓曦,第宝锋,袁媛,等.长江上游生态建设工程与植被覆盖时空变化的响应特征研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2016,25(8):1264-1272.
[29] 王雨茜,杨肖丽,任立良,等.长江上游气温、降水和干旱的变化趋势研究[J].人民长江,2017,48(20):39-44.
[30] 邹自景.发挥良好生态环境优势筑牢嘉陵江上游生态屏障[J].环境保护,2019,47(17):67-69.
[31] 张婷,薛东剑,段金亮,等.2000—2019嘉陵江流域植被覆盖时空变化特征及气候响应分析[J].长江流域资源与环境,2021,30(5):1110-1120.
[32] 潘学锐,隆建,徐旸祎.嘉陵江中下游水土流失成因与防治措施[J].农业工程技术,2018,38(2):28.
[33] 李青松,张凤太,苏维词,等.长江经济带农业用水绿色效率测度及影响因素分析:基于超效率EBM-Geodetector模型[J].中国农业资源与区划: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.3513.S.20210802.0855.004.html 1-15.
相似文献/References:
[1]杨少康,刘 冀,魏 榕,等.长江上游流域生长季气象干旱分异特征[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(02):184.
YANG Shaokang,LIU Ji,WEI Rong,et al.Differentiation Characteristics of Meteorological Drought in the Growing Season in the Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(01):184.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2021-09-12 修回日期:2021-10-18
资助项目:欧洲空间局、中国国家遥感中心项目(58516); 中国电建集团华东勘测设计研究院有限公司项目(DJ-ZDZX-2016-02-09)
第一作者:章程焱(1998—),男,浙江温州人,硕士研究生,主要从事水文学及水资源研究。E-mail:562585551@qq.com
通信作者:董晓华(1972—),男,湖北秭归人,博士,教授,主要从事水文学及水资源方面研究。E-mail:xhdong@ctgu.edu.cn