FU Yanchao,WANG Yousheng,YANG Zhi,et al.Analysis of Characteristics and Causes of Water and Sediment Changes in Recent 30 Years[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(01):224-232.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.01.005]
近30年苦水河水沙变化特征及成因分析
- Title:
- Analysis of Characteristics and Causes of Water and Sediment Changes in Recent 30 Years
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2023)01-0224-09
- 关键词:
- 水土保持与荒漠化防治; 苦水河; 水沙变化; SSC-Q环路曲线; 土地利用
- Keywords:
- soil and water conservation and desertification control; Kushui River; water and sediment change; SSC-Q loop curve; land-use
- 分类号:
- S157.1
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 苦水河是宁夏境内重要的黄河一级支流,河流含沙量高,为了探究近30年来流域内水沙变化情势及其驱动机制,文章选取1989—2019年苦水河流域郭家桥控制站水文数据、吴中气象站降雨数据和Lansat系列卫星遥感数据,采用Mann-Kendall趋势检验、集中度分析、构建水沙关系曲线和土地利用转移矩阵等统计分析方法,分析了近30年苦水河流域水沙序列和水沙关系的变化特征。结果表明:(1)苦水河年径流(p<0.1)和输沙量(p<0.05)均显著减少。年径流和泥沙集中在5—8月,且输沙集中度很高。(2)分析水沙关系曲线,参数a有显著下降的趋势,表明流域内侵蚀程度降低。洪水场次下,顺时针和正“8”字滞回类型增加,显示河流输沙能力减弱,由短而急促渐渐转向平缓长久的输沙模式。(3)近30年苦水河流域内径流量和输沙量的减少,人类活动都是首要驱动因素,贡献度分别达到73.65%和95.67%。综上,流域南部山区大范围的农田转变为草地有效降低了苦水河流域上游来沙量,退耕还草措施对促进水土保持、协调水沙关系具有积极意义。
- Abstract:
- Kushui River with high sediment content is an important tributary of the Yellow River in Ningxia. In order to explore the variation of water and sediment in the basin in the past 30 years and its driving mechanism, we selected the hydrological, meteorological and remote sensing data of Kushui River Basin from 1989 to 2019, and used Mann-Kendall trend test, concentration analysis, construction of land use transfer matrix and other statistical analysis methods to analyze the variation characteristics of water-sediment sequence and water-sediment relationship in the past 30 years. The results showed that:(1)the annual runoff(p<0.1)and sediment transport volume(p<0.05)of the Kushui River had decreased significantly; annual runoff and sediment concentrated between May and August and had a high sediment transport concentration:(2)by analyzing the water-sediment relationship curve, the parameter indicating the erosion degree in the basin had a significant downward trend; during floods, the clockwise and positive ‘8' hysteresis types increased, indicating that sediment transport capacity had weakened, and it had gradually shifted from short and rapid to a gentle and long-lasting sediment transport model;(3)human activities had always been the primary driving factors for the decrease in runoff and sediment transport in the Kushui River Basin in the past 30 years, with contributions reaching 73.65% and 95.67%, respectively. The conversion of large-scale farmland to grassland in the mountainous areas of the southern part of the basin effectively reduced the amount of sediment coming from the upper reaches of the Kushui River. The measures of returning farmland to grassland had positive effects on promoting soil and water conservation and coordinating the relationship between water and sediment.
参考文献/References:
[1] 周祖昊,刘佳嘉,严子奇,等.黄河流域天然河川径流量演变归因分析[J].水科学进展,2022,33(1):27-37.
[2] 张红武.黄河流域保护和发展存在的问题与对策[J].人民黄河,2020,42(3):1-10,16.
[3] 张春辉.基于SWAT模型的苦水河流域水文过程模拟[D]. 银川:宁夏大学,2018.
[4] 胡春宏,张晓明,赵阳.黄河泥沙百年演变特征与近期波动变化成因解析[J].水科学进展,2020,31(5):725-733.
[5] 江恩慧,王远见,张原锋,等.黄河泥沙研究新进展[J].人民黄河,2016,38(10):24-31.
[6] 冯家豪,赵广举,穆兴民,等.黄河中游区间干支流径流变化特征与归因分析[J].水力发电学报,2020,39(8):90-103.
[7] 岳志春,马晓阳,田福昌.黄河宁夏段近期水沙变化及河势演变分析[J].水利水电技术,2018,49(2):117-123.
[8] 刘强,尉飞鸿,常康飞,等.皇甫川流域水沙变化特征及其影响因素[J].干旱区研究,2021,38(6):1506-1513.
[9] 邵雪杰,顾圣平,曹爱武,等.多沙河流水沙变化特征小波分析[J].长江科学院院报,2017,34(5):5-8.
[10] 陈松生,张欧阳,陈泽方,等.金沙江流域不同区域水沙变化特征及原因分析[J].水科学进展,2008,19(4):475-482.
[11] 夏绍钦,张会兰,郝佳欣,等.长江涪江小河坝站水沙关系特性及其驱动因素研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2021,30(7):1603-1613.
[12] 周亮广,戴仕宝.近60年来淮河流域强降雨时空变化特征[J].南水北调与水利科技,2015,13(5):847-852.
[13] 刘新有,何大明,袁树堂,等.怒江干流水沙年内分配特征及其变化趋势[J].水资源与水工程学报,2015,26(4):132-135,142.
[14] Zhang L J, Qian Y F. Annual distribution features of precipitation in china and their interannual variations[J]. Acta Meteorological Sinica, 2003,17(2):146-163.
[15] 李朝月,方海燕.泰国蒙河流域水沙变化趋势及影响因素[J].应用生态学报,2020,31(2):590-598.
[16] Zheng Mingguo. A spatially invariant sediment rating curve and its temporal change following watershed management in the Chinese Loess Plateau[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018,630:1453-1463.
[17] Hu B, Wang H, Yang Z, et al. Temporal and spatial variations of sediment rating curves in the Changjiang(Yangtze River)basin and their implications[J]. Quaternary International, 2011,230:34-43.
[18] 刘彦,张建军,张岩,等.三江源区近数十年河流输沙及水沙关系变化[J].中国水土保持科学,2016,14(6):61-69.
[19] Yang C C, Lee K T. Analysis of flow-sediment rating curve hysteresis based on flow and sediment travel time estimations[J]. International Journal of Sediment Research, 2018,33(2):171-182.
[20] Fan X, Shi C, Zhou Y, et al. Sediment rating curves in the Ningxia-Inner Mongolia reaches of the upper Yellow River and their implications[J]. Quaternary International, 2012,282(19):152-162.
[21] 张华,汪文浩,暴路敏.宁夏苦水河流域生态水量分析评价应注意问题浅析[J].宁夏工程技术,2019,18(4):371-374.
[22] 陈丹,司建宁.宁夏苦水河生态基流调查分析[J].水利发展研究,2019,19(8):65-68,76.
[23] Hamed K H, Rao A R. A modified Mann-Kendall trend test for autocorrelated data[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 1998,204(1/4):182-196.
[24] Das S, Banerjee S. Investigation of changes in seasonal streamflow and sediment load in the Subarnarekha-Burhabalang basins using Mann-Kendall and Pettitt tests[J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2021,14(11):1-14.
[25] Martin-Vide J. Spatial distribution of a daily precipitation concentration index in peninsular Spain[J]. International Journal of Climatology:A Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 2004,24(8):959-971.
[26] Gao Guangyao, Ma Ying, Fu Bojie. Temporal Variations of Flow-sediment Relationships in a Highly Erodible Catchment of the Loess Plateau, China [J]. Land Degradation and Development, 2016,27(3):758-772.
[27] Müller G, Förstner U. General relationship between suspended sediment concentration and water discharge in the Alpenrhein and some other rivers[J]. Nature, 1968,217(5125):244-245.
[28] Asselman N E M. Fitting and interpretation of sediment rating curves[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2000,234(3/4):228-248..
[29] Bronsdon R K, Naden P S. Suspended sediment in the Rivers Tweed and Teviot[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2000,251:95-113.
[30] Yang G, Chen Z, Yu F, et al. Sediment rating parameters and their implications: Yangtze River, China[J]. Geomorphology, 2007,85(3/4):166-175.
[31] 胡春宏,王延贵,张燕菁,等.中国江河水沙变化趋势与主要影响因素[J].水科学进展,2010,21(4):524-532.
[32] 穆兴民,张秀勤,高鹏,等.双累积曲线方法理论及在水文气象领域应用中应注意的问题[J].水文,2010,30(4):47-51.
[33] Zabaleta A, Martínez M, Uriarte J A, et al. Factors controlling suspended sediment yield during runoff events in small headwater catchments of the Basque Country[J]. Catena, 2007,71(1):179-190.
[34] Buendia C, Vericat D, Batalla R J, et al. Temporal dynamics of sediment transport and transient in-channel storage in a highly erodible catchment[J]. Land Degradation & Development, 2016,27(4):1045-1063.
[35] Lefrançois J, Grimaldi C, Gascuel‐Odoux C, et al. Suspended sediment and discharge relationships to identify bank degradation as a main sediment source on small agricultural catchments[J]. Hydrological Processes:An International Journal, 2007,21(21):2923-2933.
[36] Zhao G, Yue X, Tian P, et al. Comparison of the suspended sediment dynamics in two Loess Plateau catchments, China[J]. Land Degradation & Development, 2017,28(4):1398-1411.
相似文献/References:
[1]韩美清,吴维洲,万炳宏,等.成兰铁路受损边坡土壤抗冲性及其影响因素[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(05):400.
HAN Meiqing,WU Weizhou,WAN Binghong,et al.Soil Anti-Scourability and Its Influence Factors of Damaged Steep Slope of Chenglan Railway[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(01):400.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2021-11-09 修回日期:2021-12-11
资助项目:国家重点研发计划项目(2019YFC1510701); 国家自然科学基金(42107375,51979290); 宁夏回族自治区水利科技项目(SBZZ-J-2020-13,SBZZ-J-2021-12)
第一作者:傅彦超(1998—),男,山东潍坊人,硕士研究生,主要从事流域自然地理学方面的研究。E-mail:fu_yanchao@bjfu.edu.cn
通信作者:王友胜(1987—),男,山东莒县人,高级工程师,主要从事流域管理和土壤侵蚀相关研究。E-mail:wangyousheng119@163.com