WANG Lingling,CAO Yingui,WANG Fan,et al.Effect of Biochar on Reconstructed Soil Chemical Properties and Drought Resistance of Medicago sativa[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(06):105-114.
生物炭对重构土壤化学性质及苜蓿抗旱性的影响
- Title:
- Effect of Biochar on Reconstructed Soil Chemical Properties and Drought Resistance of Medicago sativa
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2021)06-0105-10
- Keywords:
- land reclamation; soil reconstruction; soil chemical properties; biochar; drought resistance
- 分类号:
- S158; S541
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 为提升草原露天矿区干旱胁迫下生态修复效果，将内蒙古国家能源集团北电胜利露天煤矿矿区的表土、煤矸石、岩土剥离物及粉煤灰等原材料，按照不同配比构造4种不同的重构土壤组和表土对照组，以不同热解温度及不同用量的生物炭作为土壤改良剂，采用单因素方差分析法，开展了生物炭对土壤化学性质及苜蓿抗旱性的影响研究。结果表明:(1)施用不同处理方式的生物炭对表土对照组和重构土壤组土壤化学性质的改良效果不同。D1方案中，D1-500-12对土壤改良效果最优; H3方案中，H3-500-6对土壤改良效果最优; H10方案中，H10-300-24对土壤改良效果最优; H11方案中，H11-500-24对土壤改良效果最优; H15方案中，H15-400-6对土壤改良效果最优。(2)在重构土壤组H3，H10和H11中，当生物炭热解温度为300℃或400℃，且添加的生物炭含量为24 g时，干旱胁迫下苜蓿存活率均得到了显著的改善，在整个盆栽试验中，H3-400-24在干旱胁迫下苜蓿存活率最高。(3)结合不同处理方式的生物炭施用对土壤化学性质和苜蓿抗旱性的综合影响，最优的生物炭处理方式为H10-300-24。不同处理方式的生物炭施用对土壤化学性质的改善效果不同，对干旱胁迫下植物抗旱性的提升作用也不同。
- Abstract:
- The purpose of this study was to improve the effect of ecological restoration under drought stress in the grassland open-pit mining area. The topsoil，coal gangue，rock and soil stripping and fly ash from the Shengli open-pit mine area were constructed to reconstruct soil according to different proportions. Biochar with different pyrolysis temperatures was used as soil improver，and the variance analysis method was used to carry out the study on the effect of biochar on soil chemical properties and drought resistance of alfalfa. The results showed that:(1)application of biochar with different treatments had different effects on soil chemical properties in different schemes; in the D1 scheme，D1-500-12 had the best effect on soil improvement; in the H3 scheme，H3-500-6 had the best effect on soil improvement; in the H10 scheme，H10-300-24 had the best effect on soil improvement; in the H11 scheme，H11-500-24 had the best effect on soil improvement; in the H15 scheme，H15-400-6 had the best effect on soil improvement;(2)in the reconstructed soil group H3，H10 and H11，the survival rate of alfalfa under drought stress was significantly improved when the biochar pyrolysis temperature was 300℃ or 400℃ and the application amount was 24 g; in the pot experiment，H3-400-24 had the highest survival rate of alfalfa under drought stress;(3)with respect to the comprehensive effects of biochar applied in different treatment methods on soil chemical properties and drought resistance of alfalfa，the optimal biochar treatment method was H10-300-24. Application of biochar with different treatments has different effects on the improvement of soil chemical properties，and also has different effects on the improvement of plant drought resistance under drought stress.
参考文献/References:
[1] BP. Statistical Review of World Energy 2020[Z].69th edition. London: Statistical Review of World Energy，2020.[2] 荣颖，胡振琪，杜玉玺，等.露天矿区土壤基质改良材料研究进展[J].金属矿山，2018(2):164-171.[3] 张峰玮，甄选，陈传玺.世界露天煤矿发展现状及趋势[J].中国煤炭，2014，40(11):113-116.[4] 卞正富.我国煤矿区土地复垦与生态重建研究[J].资源·产业，2005，7(2):18-24.[5] Cao Y，Dallimer M，Stringer L C，et al. Land expropriation compensation among multiple stakeholders in a mining area: Explaining “skeleton house”compensation[J]. Land Use Policy，2018，74:97-110.[6] Cao Y，Bai Z，Sun Q，et al. Rural settlement changes in compound land use areas: Characteristics and reasons of changes in a mixed mining-rural-settlement area in Shanxi Province，China[J]. Habitat International，2017，61:9-21.[7] 韩煜，王琦，赵伟，等.草原区露天煤矿开采对土壤性质和植物群落的影响[J].生态学杂志，2019，38(11):3425-3433.[8] 白中科.黄土区大型露天矿复垦土地的土壤重构与土壤环境质量[C]//中国土壤学会土壤环境专业委员会，中国科学院土壤圈物质循环开放研究实验室.第七次“土壤与环境”学术研讨会论文摘要.厦门，2001.[9] Robson T，Golos P J，Stevens J，et al. Enhancing tailings revegetation using shallow cover systems in arid environments: Hydrogeochemical，nutritional，and ecophysiological constraints[J]. Land Degradation & Development，2018，29(9):2785-2796.[10] Ghosh R，Ghosh D N. Biological reclamation of surface mined land without soil grafting: A working model[J]. International Journal of Mining，Reclamation and Environment，1993，7(4):167-170.[11] Hu Z，Zhu Q，Liu X，et al. Preparation of topsoil alternatives for open-pit coal mines in the Hulunbuir grassland area，China[J]. Applied Soil Ecology，2020，147.DOI:10.1016/j.apsoil.2019.103431.[12] 刘雪冉，胡振琪，许涛，等.露天煤矿表土替代材料研究综述[J].中国矿业，2017，26(3):81-85.[13] 陈芳，张康康，谷思诚，等.不同种类生物质炭及施用量对水稻生长及土壤养分的影响[J].华中农业大学学报，2019，38(5):57-63.[14] Zheng X，Song W，Guan E，et al. Response in physicochemical properties of tobacco-growing soils and N/P/K accumulation in tobacco plant to tobacco straw biochar[J]. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition，2020，20(2):293-305.[15] 严陶韬，丁子菊，朱倩，等.生物质炭对黄棕壤理化性质及龙脑樟幼苗生长的影响[J].土壤，2018，50(4):681-686.[16] 李明，李忠佩，刘明，等.不同秸秆生物炭对红壤性水稻土养分及微生物群落结构的影响[J].中国农业科学，2015，48(7):1361-1369.[17] Edeh I G，Maek O，Buss W. A meta-analysis on biochar's effects on soil water properties-New insights and future research challenges[J]. Science of the Total Environment，2020，714.DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136857.[18] 蒋太英，徐凡，甄晓溪，等.生物炭表面水溶活性分子可以有效提高水稻的耐旱性[J].分子植物育种，2015，13(6):1223-1232.[19] 赵君，姚彤，李明，等.生物炭对干旱胁迫下蓝盆花生长及根际土壤真菌丰度的影响[J].北方园艺，2019(14):93-99.[20] Artiola J F，Rasmussen C，Freitas R. Effects of a biochar-amended alkaline soil on the growth of romaine lettuce and bermudagrass[J]. Soil Science，2012，177(9): 561-570.[21] 况欣宇，曹银贵，罗古拜，等.基于不同重构土壤材料配比的草木樨生物量差异分析[J].农业资源与环境学报，2019，36(4):453-461.[22] 武玉，徐刚，吕迎春，等.生物炭对土壤理化性质影响的研究进展[J].地球科学进展，2014，29(1):68-79.[23] Gonzaga M I S，Mackowiak C L，Comerford N B，et al. Pyrolysis methods impact biosolids-derived biochar composition，maize growth and nutrition[J]. Soil and Tillage Research，2017，165(1):59-65.[24] 高海英，何绪生，陈心想，等.生物炭及炭基硝酸铵肥料对土壤化学性质及作物产量的影响[J].农业环境科学学报，2012，31(10):1948-1955.[25] Bass A M，Bird M I，Kay G，et al. Soil properties，greenhouse gas emissions and crop yield under compost，biochar and co-composted biochar in two tropical agronomic systems[J]. Science of the Total Environment，2016，550(1):459-470.[26] 张俊叶，刘晓东，王林，等.生物质炭的土壤效应研究综述[J].中国农学通报，2020，36(9):46-50.[27] 张峥嵘.生物炭改良土壤物理性质的初步研究[D].杭州:浙江大学，2014.[28] Plaza C，Giannetta B，Fernández J M，et al. Response of different soil organic matter pools to biochar and organic fertilizers[J]. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment，2016，225:150-159.[29] Liu X，Zheng J，Zhang D，et al. Biochar has no effect on soil respiration across Chinese agricultural soils[J]. Science of the Total Environment，2016，554:259-265.[30] Gomez-Munoz B，Case S D C，Jensen L S. Pig slurry acidification and separation techniques affect soil N and C turnover and N2O emissions from solid，liquid and biochar fractions[J]. Journal of Environmental Management，2016，168:236-244.[31] 李露，周自强，潘晓健，等.不同时期施用生物炭对稻田N2O和CH4排放的影响[J].土壤学报，2015，52(4):839-848.[32] Paneque M，José M，Franco-Navarro J D，et al. Effect of biochar amendment on morphology，productivity and water relations of sunflower plants under non-irrigation conditions[J]. Catena，2016，147:280-287.[33] Lehmann J，da Silva J P，Steiner C，et al. Nutrient availability and leaching in an archaeological Anthrosol and a Ferralsol of the Central Amazon basin: fertilizer，manure and charcoal amendments[J]. Plant and Soil，2003，249(2):343-357.[34] 陈心想，何绪生，耿增超，等.生物炭对不同土壤化学性质、小麦和糜子产量的影响[J].生态学报，2013，33(20):6534-6542.[35] 罗俊杰，欧巧明，叶春雷，等.重要胡麻栽培品种的抗旱性综合评价及指标筛选[J].作物学报，2014，40(7):1259-1273.[36] 吉贵锋，王鹏泽，位辉琴，等.生物炭对不同植烟土壤理化特性及烤烟根系发育的影响[J].中国农业科技导报，2019，21(10):148-156.[37] 袁金华，徐仁扣.生物质炭的性质及其对土壤环境功能影响的研究进展[J].生态环境学报，2011，20(4):779-785.[38] Wacal C，Ogata N，Basalirwa D，et al. Growth，seed yield，mineral nutrients and soil properties of sesame(Sesamum indicum L.)as influenced by biochar addition on upland field converted from paddy[J]. Agronomy，2019，9(2):55-75.[39] Carvalho M T D，Maia A D N，Madari B E，et al. Biochar increases plant-available water in a sandy loam soil under an aerobic rice crop system[J]. Solid Earth，2014，5(2):939-952.[40] Usowicz B，Lipiec J，ukowski M，et al. The effect of biochar application on thermal properties and albedo of loess soil under grassland and fallow[J]. Soil & Tillage Research，2016，164:45-51.[41] Caroline A，Debode J，Vandecasteele B，et al. Biological，physicochemical and plant health responses in lettuce and strawberry in soil or peat amended with biochar[J]. Applied Soil，2016，107:1-12.[42] Sun J，He F，Zhang Z，et al. Temperature and moisture responses to carbon mineralization in the biochar-amended saline soil[J]. Science of the Total Environment，2016，569:390-394.[43] Ahmad M，Ok Y S，Kim B Y，et al. Impact of soybean stover-and pine needle-derived biochars on Pb and As mobility，microbial community，and carbon stability in a contaminated agricultural soil[J]. Journal of Environmental Management，2016，166:131-139.[44] Xu G，Zhang Y，Sun J，et al. Negative interactive effects between biochar and phosphorus fertilization on phosphorus availability and plant yield in saline sodic soil[J]. Science of the Total Environment，2016，568:910-915.
相似文献/References:
[1]薛建春,白中科.生态脆弱矿区土地复垦方案实施监测评价研究——以平朔矿区为例[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(01):246.
XUE Jian-chun,BAI Zhong-ke.Study on the Monitoring and Evaluation of Land Recalmation Implementation in Ecologically Fragile Mining Area——A Case Study of Pingshuo Mining Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(06):246.
[2]李锐,焦锋.神府─东胜煤田建设对土地资源的影响──大柳塔地区土地资源动态分析[J].水土保持研究,1994,1(04):112.
Li Rui,Jian Feng.Effects of Mining Construction on Land Resources in Shenfu-Dongsheng Coalfields——An analysis of land resources changes in Daliuta area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1994,1(06):112.
[3]陈玲玲,林振山,谢正磊.人类活动与土地资源的动力学关系研究[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(02):239.
CHEN Ling-ling,LIN Zhen-shan,XIE Zheng-lei.The Dynamic Relationship of Land Resource and Human Activity[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(06):239.
[4]王曰鑫,程刚,栗丽.山西采煤产生的土地破坏及防治对策[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(05):408.
WANG Yue-xin,CHENG Gang,LI Li.Land Destruction by Coal Mining in Shanxi and Its Prevention and Control Measure[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(06):408.
[5]王玲玲,刘志斌.硅砂矿土地复垦方案的费用效益分析[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(06):221.
WANG Ling-ling,LIU Zhi-bin.Analysis on Cost-Benefit of Land Reclamation Scheme in Silica Sand Mine[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(06):221.
[6]高国雄,高保山,周心澄,等.国外工矿区土地复垦动态研究[J].水土保持研究,2001,8(01):98.
GAO Guoxiong,GAO Baoshan,ZHOU Xincheng,et al.Research of Developments on Land Reclamation of the Foreign Factory-mineral Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2001,8(06):98.
[7]何梦竹,许芳芳,高兆慧,等.淮南煤矿复垦区土壤腐殖质特征及其与重金属的关系[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(01):317.
HE Mengzhu,XU Fangfang,GAO Zhaohui,et al.Characteristics of Soil Humus and Correlation with Heavy Metals in Reclaimed Land in Huainan Coal Mine[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(06):317.
[8]田小松,郑杰炳,周春蓉,等.矿区土地复垦的影响评价及复垦思路修正——以重庆石灰岩矿山为例[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(01):235.
TIAN Xiaosong,ZHENG Jiebing,ZHOU Chunrong,et al.Impact Assessment and Modified Strategy of Land Reclamation in Mining Area -A Case Study of Limestone Mine in Chongqing City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(06):235.
[9]王莉,张和生.国内外矿区土地复垦研究进展[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(01):294.
WANG Li,ZHANG He-sheng.The Research Progress of Land Reclamation in Mining Area in Domestic and Abroad[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(06):294.
[10]张灵,白中科,景明,等.黄土区大型露天煤矿复垦排土场植被恢复立地类型划分——以安太堡露天煤矿为例[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(06):54.
ZHANG Ling,BAI Zhong-ke,JING Ming,et al.Type Classification for Vegetation Restoration on Dump of Large Opencast Coal-Mine in Loess Area -Taking Antaibao Opencast Coal-Mine as an Example[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(06):54.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2020-11-21 修回日期:2020-12-23资助项目:国家重点研发计划项目“表土稀缺矿区土壤构建与改良技术”(2016YFC0501105～2)第一作者:王玲玲(1998—)，女，河北邢台人，硕士研究生，研究方向为土地复垦与生态修复。E-mail:wll_1209@163.com通信作者:曹银贵(1982—)，男，湖南常德人，博士，教授，博士生导师.主要从事国土空间修复与土地利用管理研究。E-mail:caoyingui1982@126.com