ZHANG Huan,MU Xingmin,GAO Peng.Variation of Litter Accumulation and Water Holding Capacity at Different Site Conditions in the Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(03):45-52.
黄土高原不同立地条件下枯落物蓄积量及持水特征
- Title:
- Variation of Litter Accumulation and Water Holding Capacity at Different Site Conditions in the Loess Plateau
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2021)03-0045-08
- Keywords:
- Loess Plateau; site condition; litter volume; water-holding capability; different vegetation zones
- 分类号:
- S715.7
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 枯落物具有重要的水源涵养和拦蓄径流的功能,研究不同立地条件对枯落物蓄积量及水文功能的影响对于评价黄土高原生态恢复过程中枯落物的水土保持功能具有重要的意义。选择黄土高原典型植被带为调查样点,以不同立地条件下草本群落枯落物为研究对象,对枯落物的蓄积量及水文特征进行了相关研究。结果表明:(1)不同植被带枯落物蓄积量表现为森林带(154.25～392.95 g/m2)>森林草原带(151.27～287.58 g/m2)>草原带(109.24～174.81 g/m2),枯落物蓄积量总体表现为阴坡>阳坡,沟坡>梁坡;(2)不同立地条件下枯落物自然含水率、最大持水量、最大吸湿比均具有一定的差异性。森林带、森林草原带、草原带枯落物自然含水率的变化趋势分别为28%～54.5%,26.8%～41%和20.7%～31.3%,最大持水量分别为自身的3.26～3.64,2.94～3.2,1.63～1.92倍,最大吸湿比分别为3.26～3.64,2.94～3.21,2.63～2.92。(3)不同立地条件下枯落物持水量和浸水时间存在显著对数函数关系(R2>0.91),吸水速率和浸泡时间存在幂函数关系(R2>0.99);(4)枯落物有效拦蓄量表现为森林带(219.86～787.09 g/m2)>森林草原带(188.15～437.7 g/m2)>草原带(99.89～181.22 g/m2),表明森林带对径流拦蓄的贡献率最大,其次为森林草原带和草原带。立地条件对枯落物蓄积量和持水性能影响显著,研究结果可为科学评价黄土高原生态恢复过程中枯落物水土保持效益提供一定的理论依据。
- Abstract:
- Litter plays an important role in water conservation and runoff regulation, which has great significance for evaluating the water and soil conservation function of litter during the ecological restoration of the Loess Plateau. In order to investigate the properties of the litter layer of the herb communities, three typical vegetation zones were chosen at different site conditions in the Loess Plateau, and effect of litter on hydrological functioning was assessed. The results show that:(1)the litter accumulation in different vegetation zones decreased in the order: forest(154.25～392.95 g/m2)>forest-steppe(151.27～287.58 g/m2)>grassland(109.24～174.81g/m2), and the litter accumulation in the shady slope was generally higher than that in the sunny slope, and higher on the gully slope than that on the ridge slope;(2)the natural moisture contents of litter in forest zone, forest-steppe zone and grassland zone were 28%～54.5%, 26.8%～41% and 20.7%～31.3%, respectively; the maximum water-holding capacities of litter were 3.26～3.64,2.94～3.2 and 1.63～1.92 times of litter mass, respectively, and the maximum moisture absorption ratios were 3.26～3.64, 2.94～3.21 and 2.63～2.92, respectively;(3)the relationship between the obtained values of water holding capacity and soaking time of litter followed the logarithmic function well(R2>0.91), and the relationship between the water absorption rate and soaking time could be described by power function well(R2>0.99);(4)the effective runoff interception of litter followed the order: forest(219.86～787.09 g/m2)>forest-steppe(188.15～437.7 g/m2)>grassland(99.89～181.22 g/m2), indicating that the forest zone had the largest contribution to runoff interception, followed by forest grassland and grassland. Overall, different site conditions had significant impacts on litter accumulation and water holding capacity.
参考文献/References:
[1] 刘强,彭少麟.植物凋落物生态学[M].北京:科学出版社,2010.[2] Shi Z H, Yue B J, Wang L, et al. Effects of mulch cover rate on interrill erosion processes and the size selectivity of eroded sediment on steep slopes[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2013,77(1):257-267.[3] 吴钦孝,赵鸿雁,韩冰.黄土高原森林枯枝落叶层保持水土的有效性[J].西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版,2001,29(5):95-98.[4] 吴钦孝,赵鸿雁,刘向东,等.森林枯枝落叶层涵养水源保持水土的作用评价[J].土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报,1998,4(2):24-29.[5] 李强,周道玮,陈笑莹.地上枯落物的累积、分解及其在陆地生态系统中的作用[J].生态学报,2014,34(14):3807-3819.[6] 王佑民.中国林地枯落物持水保土作用研究概况[J].水土保持学报,2000,14(4):108-113.[7] 牛勇,刘洪禄,张志强.北京地区典型树种及非生物因子对枯落物水文效应的影响[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(8):183-189.[8] 孙龙,张光辉,王兵,等.黄土高原不同退耕年限刺槐林地土壤侵蚀阻力[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(10):191-197.[9] 王忠禹,刘国彬,王兵,等.黄土丘陵区典型植物枯落物凋落动态及其持水性[J].生态学报,2019,39(7):2416-2425.[10] 栾莉莉,张光辉,孙龙,等.黄土高原区典型植被枯落物蓄积量空间变化特征[J].中国水土保持科学,2015,13(6):48-53.[11] 王忠禹,王兵,刘国彬,等.黄土丘陵区典型植被枯落物坡面分布及混入土壤对土壤性状的影响[J].自然资源学报,2018,33(11):2020-2031.[12] 寇萌,焦菊英,尹秋龙,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区主要草种枯落物的持水能力与养分潜在归还能力[J].生态学报,2015,35(5):1337-1349.[13] 丁绍兰,杨乔媚,赵串串,等.黄土丘陵区不同林分类型枯落物层及其林下土壤持水能力研究[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(5):104-108.[14] 侯贵荣,毕华兴,魏曦,等.黄土残塬沟壑区3种林地枯落物和土壤水源涵养功能[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(2):357-363.[15] 邹厚远.陕北黄土高原植被区划及与林草建设的关系[J].水土保持研究,2000,7(2):96-101.[16] 谭学进.黄土高原草地恢复对土壤物理性质的影响[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2019.[17] 叶海英,赵廷宁,赵陟峰.半干旱黄土丘陵沟壑区几种不同人工水土保持林枯落物储量及持水特性研究[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(1):121-125.[18] 李鑫,马瑞萍,安韶山,等.黄土高原不同植被带土壤团聚体有机碳和酶活性的粒径分布特征[J].应用生态学报,2015,26(8):2282-2290.[19] 占峰,杨冬梅.光照条件、植株冠层结构和枝条寿命的关系:以桂花和水杉为例[J].生态学报,2012,6(28):2486-2492.[20] 寇萌,焦菊英,杜华栋,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区不同立地条件草本群落物种多样性与生物量研究[J].西北林学院学报,2013,28(1):12-18.[21] 刘中奇,朱清科,邝高明,等.半干旱黄土丘陵沟壑区封禁流域植被枯落物分布规律研究[J].草业科学,2010,27(4):20-24.[22] 塔莉,张丽茹.冀北山地天然次生林枯落物层水文生态功能对不同林分密度的响应[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(6):46-51,59.[23] 马正锐,程积民,班松涛,等.宁夏森林枯落物储量与持水性能分析[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(4):199-203,238.[24] 杨寒月,张光辉,张宝军.黄土丘陵区沟坡典型植物群落枯落物蓄积量及其持水性能[J].中国水土保持科学,2019,17(3):83-90.[25] 刘宇,张洪江,张友焱,等.晋西黄土丘陵区不同人工林枯落物持水特性研究[J].水土保持通报,2013,33(6):69-74.
相似文献/References:
[1]白桦,穆兴民,王双银.水土保持措施对秃尾河径流的影响[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(01):40.
BAI Hua,MU Xing-min,WANG Shuang-yin.Impact of Soil and Water Conservation on River Flow of Tuwei River[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(03):40.
[2]杨国安,徐勇,郭腾云.基于脆弱性和可持续生计视角的黄土高原生态环境治理研究[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(02):64.
YANG Guo-an,XU Yong,GUO Teng-yun.Eco-environmental Construction on the Loess Plateau Based on the Perspective of the Vulnerability and Sustainable Livelihoods Approaches[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(03):64.
[3]肖培青,姚文艺,张海峰.黄土高原植被固土减蚀作用研究进展[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):282.
XIAO Pei-qing,YAO Wen-yi,ZHANG Hai-feng.Research Progress of the Role of Vegetation in Soil Conservtion and Soil Erosion Reduction on the Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(03):282.
[4]马芹,张晓萍,万龙,等.黄土高原河龙区间最大日雨量(PMP)极值拟合及时空演变特征[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(02):71.
MA Qin,ZHANG Xiao-ping,WAN Long,et al.Fitting of the PMP Values and Identifying Its Spatiotemporal Characteristics in the Helong Section on the Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(03):71.
[5]卓玛兰草,刘普幸,张亚宁,等.甘肃黄土高原区潜在蒸散量时空变化与成因研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(01):70.
ZHUO Malancao,LIU Pu-xing,ZHANG Ya-ning,et al.Study on Temporal and Spatial Changes of the Potential Evapotranspiration and Its Impact Factors in Loess Plateau of Gansu Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(03):70.
[6]施宇,温仲明,龚时慧,等.黄土丘陵区植物功能性状沿气候梯度的变化规律[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(01):107.
SHI Yu,WEN Zhong-ming,GONG Shi-hui,et al.Trait Variations along a Climatic Gradient in Hilly Area of Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(03):107.
[7]穆兴民,陈国良,徐学选.黄土高原降水量与地理因素关系分析[J].水土保持研究,1992,(02):80.
Mu Xingmin,Chen Guoliang,Xu Xuexuan.ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PRECIPITATION AND GEOGRAPICAL FACTORS IN LOESS PLATEAU[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1992,(03):80.
[8]刘静.数字化地形模型（DTM）在水土保持中的应用[J].水土保持研究,1992,(02):96.
Liu Jeng.ESTABLSHING AND APPLICATION OF DTM FOR SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1992,(03):96.
[9]赵安成.陇东黄土高原沟壑区典型小流域治理模式剖析[J].水土保持研究,1994,1(01):45.
Zhao Ancheng.Analysis of Control Models of Typical Small Watershedin Gully Area of Loess Plateau, the East Part of Gansu Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1994,1(03):45.
[10]吴钦孝,汪有科,韩冰,等.黄土高原水土流失区的林草资源和植被建设[J].水土保持研究,1994,1(03):2.
Wu Qinxiao,Wang Youke,Han Bing,et al.Forest and Grassland Resources and Vegetation Construction in The Soil and Water Loss Region of The Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1994,1(03):2.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2020-11-16 修回日期:2020-11-27资助项目:国家重点研发计划专题计划“黄土高原水土流失治理与生态产业协同发展技术集成与模式”(2016YFC0501707)第一作者:张缓(1994—),女,河南夏邑人,硕士研究生,研究方向为流域生态水文与水土保持。E-mail:1585702413@qq.com通信作者:高鹏(1976—),男,陕西扶风人,研究员,博士,博士生导师,主要从事流域生态水文和水土保持研究工作。E-mail:gaopeng@ms.iswc.ac.cn