[1]王眉樾,张兰珍,翟禄新,等.毛竹与桉树蒸散估算公式修正及对比分析[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(06):353-361.
　WANG Meiyue,ZHANG Lanzhen,ZHAI Luxin,et al.Modification and Comparative Analysis of Evapotranspiration Estimation Formulas for Phyllostachys edulis and Eucalyptus grandisE. urophylla[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(06):353-361.
点击复制

毛竹与桉树蒸散估算公式修正及对比分析

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 27 期数: 2020年06期 页码: 353-361 栏目: 目次 出版日期: 2020-10-20
Title:
Modification and Comparative Analysis of Evapotranspiration Estimation Formulas for Phyllostachys edulis and Eucalyptus grandis×E. urophylla
文章编号:
1005-3409(2020)06-0353-09
作者:
王眉樾, 张兰珍, 翟禄新, 刘芸瑜, 黎 婵, 欧晓华, 廖伟婷, 迟晋浙
(广西师范大学 环境与资源学院, 广西 桂林 541004)
Author(s):
WANG Meiyue, ZHANG Lanzhen, ZHAI Luxin, LIU Yunyu, LI Chan, OU Xiaohua, LIAO Weiting, CHI Jinzhe
(College of Environment and Resources, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, Guangxi 541004, China)
关键词:
蒸散;  修正;  毛竹;  桉树
Keywords:
evapotranspiration;  modification;  Phyllostachys edulis;  Eucalyptus grandis×; E. urophylla
分类号:
S161.4
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了分析不同公式在蒸散估算方面的适用性,认识毛竹和桉树的水分行为,在以称重法实测盆栽毛竹和桉树的蒸散量的基础上,结合常规气象观测数据,应用线性回归对9个估算公式进行了修正,评定了不同公式的适用性及改进效果,并分析了两种植物的蒸散差异。结果表明:修正前Jensen-Haise,Hargreaves1975和Doorenbos-Pruitt法估算的毛竹蒸散量精度较高,FAO Penman-Monteith,Hargreaves1975和Jensen-Haise法估算的桉树的蒸散量与实测值较接近; 修正后的参考蒸散公式能显著改善实际蒸散量的估算精度。桉树的蒸散量比毛竹的大38%,且桉树的蒸散量对于气象要素的变化比毛竹的蒸散量更加敏感。9个公式在桂北地区的适用性依次为FAO Penman-Monteith,Jensen-Haise,Hargreaves1975,Doorenbos-Pruitt,Priestley-Taylor,Hargreaves1985,Makkink,Abtew,Turc。
Abstract:
To analyze the applicability of the different formulas for estimating evapotranspiration and to explore the water behavior of Phyllostachys edulis and Eucalyptus grandis×E. urophylla, based on the measured evapotranspiration of potted Phyllostachys edulis and Eucalyptus grandis×E. urophylla using weighting method and the calculated evapotranspiration with conventional meteorological data, the estimation formulas were modified by using linear regression approach. The modification improvement and the applicability of these formulas were evaluated; in addition, the evapotranspiration difference of the two plants was analyzed. The results show that before modification, the accuracy for evapotranspiration of Phyllostachys edulis estimated by the Jensen-Haise, Hargreaves1975 and Doorenbos-Pruitt methods is relatively high, and the evapotranspiration values of Eucalyptus grandis×E. urophylla estimated by the FAO Penman-Monteith, Hargreaves1975 and Jensen-Haise methods are close to the actual measured values. The accuracy of actual evapotranspiration estimation is improved significantly by the modified evapotranspiration Formulas. It is also shown that the evapotranspiration of Eucalyptus grandis×E. urophylla is up to 38% larger and more sensitive to the change of meteorological factors than that of Phyllostachys edulis. The order for applicability of these 9 formulas in Northern Guangxi is found as FAO Penman-Monteith, Jensen-Haise, Hargreaves1975, Doorenbos-Pruitt, Priestley-Taylor, Hargreaves1985, Makkink, Abtew and Turc.

参考文献/References:

[1] 樊军,邵明安,王全九.黄土区参考作物蒸散量多种计算方法的比较研究(简报)[J].农业工程学报,2008,24(3):98-102.
[2] 丛振涛,杨大文,倪广恒.蒸发原理与应用[M].北京:科学出版社,2013.
[3] 李艳,刘海军,罗雨.北京地区潜在蒸散量计算方法的比较研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2010,29(5):27-32.
[3] 时忠杰,徐大平,张宁南,等.桉树人工林水文影响研究进展[J].林业科学,2009,45(11):135-140.
[5] 丁新新,洪伟,陈建忠,等.不同经营模式下毛竹林土壤水分物理性质比较[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(3):74-78,83.
[6] 舒海燕,江洪,陈晓峰,等.安吉毛竹林生态系统水汽通量的变化特征[J].生态学杂志,2016,35(5):1154-1161.
[7] 胡策,梁谢恩,王海湘,等.毛竹快速生长期光合蒸腾日变化特征[J].浙江农林大学学报,2018,35(2):277-283.
[8] 陈金梅,李守中,林培治,等.桉树与杉木树干液流特征对比研究[J].福建林业科技,2013,40(1):6-11,25.
[9] 张宁南.广东桉树人工林耗水量研究[D].北京:中国林科院,2010.
[10] Xu C Y, Singh V P. Evaluation and generalization of radiation-based methods for calculating evaporation [J]. Hydrological Processes, 2000,14(2):339-349.
[11] Zhai L X, Feng Q, Li Q S, et al. Comparison and modification of equations for calculating evapotranspiration(ET)with data from Gansu Province, Northwest China [J]. Irrigation and Drainage, 2009,59(4):477-490.
[12] 潘菲,翟禄新,杨庆媛.基于广西气象数据的蒸散发计算公式对比及修正[J].灌溉排水学报,2014,33(1):55-60.
[13] 赵宝山,闫浩芳,张川,等. Venlo型温室内参考作物蒸散量计算方法比较研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2018,37(7):61-66.
[14] Allen R G, Pereira L S, Raes D, et al. Crop evapotransporation guidelines for computing crop water requirements[R].Rome: FAO, 1998.
[15] Hargreaves G H. Moisture availability and crop production[J]. Transactions of the Asae, 1975,18(5):980-984.
[16] Hargreaves G L, Hargreaces G H and Riley J P. Irrigation water requirements for Senegal River Basin[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 1985,111(3):265-275.
[17] Makkink G F. Testing the Penman formula by means of lysimeters[J]. Journal of the Institution of Water Engineers, 1957,11(3):277-288.
[18] Turc L. Estimation of irrigation water requirements, potential evapotranspiration: a simple climatic formula evolved up to date[J]. Annals of Agronomy, 1961,12(1):13-49.
[19] Priestley C B H, Taylor R J. On the assessment of the surface heat flux and evaporation using large-scale parameters[J]. Monthly Weather Review, 1972,100(2):81-92.
[20] Jensen M E, Haise H R. Estimation of evapotranspiration from solar radiation. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Division[J], Journal of the Irrigation and Drainage Division, 1963,89(4):15-41.
[21] Doorenbos J, Pruitt W. Guidelines for Predicting-Crop Water Requirements, Irrigation and Drainage Paper 24[R]. Rome: FAO, 1977.
[22] Abtew W. Evapotranspiration measurement and modeling for three wetland systems in South Florida [J]. Water Resources Bulletin, 1996,32(3):465-473.
[23] 杨静学,黄本胜,陈亮雄,等.基于PT-T和SBDART模型的桉树人工林蒸散量研究[J].华南师范大学学报:自然科学版,2014,46(4):103-109.

相似文献/References:

[1]龚元石,李保国.农田水量平衡模型对作物根系吸水函数及蒸散公式的敏感性[J].水土保持研究,1996,3(03):1.
　Gong Yuanshi,Li Baoguo.Sensibility of the Field Water Budget Model to Water Extraction Function by Roots and Evapotranspiration form[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1996,3(06):1.
[2]李红寿,汪万福,张国彬,等.水分蒸散耗散结构的初步验证[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(06):200.
　LI Hong-shou,WANG Wan-fu,ZHANG Guo-bin,et al.The Primary Proof-Testing of the Evapotranspiration Dissipative Structure in the Extreme Dry Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(06):200.
[3]侯兰功,肖洪浪,邹松兵,等.黑河流域水循环特征研究[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(03):254.
　HOU Lang-gong,XIAO Hong-lang,ZOU Song-bing,et al.Study on the Features of Water Cycle in Heihe River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(06):254.
[4]何聪,熊伟,王彦辉,等.六盘山北侧华北落叶松林分的水分利用效率研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(05):112.
　HE Cong,XIONG Wei,WANG Yan-hui,et al.The Water Use Efficiency of Larix principis-rupprechtii Plantation in the Northern Liupan Mountain[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(06):112.
[5]王云霓,何聪,熊伟,等.宁夏六盘山3种典型植物群落水分利用特征及其组分的季节变化[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(04):34.
　WANG Yunni,HE Cong,XIONG Wei,et al.The Water Use Characteristics of Three Representative Plant Communities and their Seasonal Variation in Liupan Mountains,Ningxia[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(06):34.
[6]白永红,高志永,汪有科,等.修剪强度对枣林地耗水及水分利用效率的影响[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(04):206.
　BAI Yonghong,GAO Zhiyong,WANG Youke,et al.Effects of Pruning Intensity on Water Consumption and Water Use Efficiency of Jujube Plantation[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(06):206.
[7]王雅倩,岳永杰,乌云珠拉,等.基于SWAT模型的根河流域蒸散量时空分布特征[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(01):256.
　WANG Yaqian,YUE Yongjie,WU Yunzhula,et al.Temporal and Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Evapotranspiration in Genhe River Basin Based on Soil and Water Assessment Tool Model[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(06):256.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2019-12-27 修回日期:2020-01-09
资助项目:国家自然科学基金(41261005,41867028)
第一作者:王眉樾(1998—),女,河南鹤壁人,本科生,研究方向为生态水文。E-mail:wmy7528@163.com
通信作者:翟禄新(1970—),男,甘肃礼县人,副教授,博士,主要从事生态水文学研究。E-mail:zhailuxin6931@163.com

更新日期/Last Update: 2020-10-20