TA Li,ZHANG Liru.Response of Hydro-Ecological Functions of Natural Secondary Forest Litter Layer to Different Stand Densities in Mountainous Area of Northern Hebei Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(06):46-51,59.
冀北山地天然次生林枯落物层水文生态功能对不同林分密度的响应
- Title:
- Response of Hydro-Ecological Functions of Natural Secondary Forest Litter Layer to Different Stand Densities in Mountainous Area of Northern Hebei Province
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2020)06-0046-06
- Keywords:
- mountain area of northern Hebei; different density; secondary forest; litter; hydrological ecology
- 分类号:
- S714.7; S715
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 为研究冀北山地天然次生林枯落物层水文生态功能对不同林分密度的响应,以该地区5种密度天然次生林作为研究对象,采用室内浸泡法对枯落物层水文生态效应进行了定量测定。结果表明:(1)枯落物厚度范围为45.34～60.70 mm,蓄积量为11.56～19.64 t/hm2,依次排序为930株/hm2>1 190株/hm2>780株/hm2>520株/hm2>280株/hm2,即随着林分密度增加呈现先增长后减小的变化规律。(2)枯落物层最大持水量变化范围为23.26～44.67 t/hm2,枯落物最大拦蓄量范围为21.15～39.56 t/hm2,枯落物有效拦蓄量范围为17.66～32.86 t/hm2,大小排序均为:930株/hm2>1 190株/hm2>780株/hm2>520株/hm2>280株/hm2。(3)枯落物持水量与浸水时间呈明显对数函数关系(R2>0.93),持水速率与与浸水时间呈幂函数关系(R2>0.99)。(4)综合枯落物层持水能力与拦蓄能力表明密度为930株/hm2的林分生态水文效应最强,而其他密度水文生态功能相对较差,因此在该地区内针对密度过高或过低的天然次生林进行有效抚育措施有利于增加林分的水源涵养能力。
- Abstract:
- In order to study the hydrological and ecological functions of the natural secondary forest litter layer in different density areas in the Mountain area of northern Hebei Province, the hydro-ecological effects of litter layers of five dense natural secondary forests were quantitatively measured by indoor immersion method. The results showed that:(1)the litter thickness ranged from 45.34 mm to 60.70 mm, and the accumulations ranged from 11.56 t/hm2 to 19.64 t/hm2. The litter thickness decreased in the order: 930 trees/hm2>1 190 trees/hm2>780 trees/hm2>520 trees/hm2>280 trees/hm2;(2)the maximum water holding capacity of litter layer ranged from 23.26 t/hm2 to 44.67 t/hm2, 21.15 t/hm2 to 39.56 t/hm2 and 17.66 t/hm2 to 32.86 t/hm2, respectively; the maximum water holding capacity decreased in the order: 930 trees/hm2>1 190 trees/hm2>780 trees/hm2>520 trees/hm2>280 trees/hm2;(3)there was a logarithmic function relationship between litter water holding capacity and soaking time(R2>0.93), and a power function relationship between litter water holding rate and soaking time(R2>0.99);(4)the comprehensive water holding capacity and retention capacity of litter layer showed that the ecological and hydrological effect of 930 trees/hm2 stands was the strongest, while the hydrological and ecological function of other densities was relatively poor. Therefore, effective tending measures for the natural secondary forests with too high or too low density in this area can be conducive to increasing the water conservation capacity of the stands.
参考文献/References:
[1] 田超,杨新兵,李军,等.冀北山地不同海拔蒙古栎林枯落物和土壤水文效应[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(4):222-227.
[2] 张振明,余新晓,牛健植,等.不同林分枯落物层的水文生态功能[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(3):139-143.
[3] 贺宇,丁国栋,梁文俊,等.林分密度对枯落物层持水特性的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版,2012,40(4):68-72.
[4] 陈莉莉,王得祥,张宋智,等.不同密度油松人工林土壤特性及水源涵养功能研究[J].西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版,2013,41(7):141-149.
[5] 田超,杨新兵,李军,等.冀北山地阴坡枯落物层和土壤层水文效应研究[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(2):97-103.
[6] 杨振奇,秦富仓,李晓琴,等.砒砂岩区主要造林树种枯落物及林下土壤持水特性[J].水土保持报,2017,31(3):118-122.
[7] 喻阳华,李光容,皮发剑,等.赤水河上游主要森林类型水源涵养功能评价[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(2):150-156.
[8] 韩雪成,赵雨森,辛颖,等.大兴安岭北部火烧迹地兴安落叶松人工林土壤水文效应[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(4):183-188.
[9] 卢振启,黄秋娴,杨新兵,等.河北雾灵山不同海拔油松人工林枯落物及土壤水文效应研究[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(1):113-116.
[10] 梁晓娇,王树力.阿什河源头不同类型红松人工林枯落物及其土壤水文特性[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(1):140-145,152.
[11] 张伟.冀北山地森林水文特征研究[D].河北保定:河北农业大学,2011.
[12] 杨振奇,秦富仓,李晓琴,等.砒砂岩区主要造林树种枯落物及林下土壤持水特性[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(3):118-122.
[13] 张引,张楠,梁文俊,等.接坝地区6种典型华北落叶松林分类型水源涵养功能[J].内蒙古农业大学学报:自然科学版,2019,40(2):26-31.
[14] 陈波.北京八达岭石佛寺森林生态系统服务功能与健康研究[D].河北保定:河北农业大学,2013.
[15] 鲁绍伟,陈波,潘青华,等.北京山地7种人工纯林枯落物及土壤水文效应[J].内蒙古农业大学学报:自然科学版,2013,34(5):53-59.
[16] 陈波,杨新兵,赵心苗,等.冀北山地6种天然纯林枯落物及土壤水文效应[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(2):196-202.
[17] 谈正鑫,万福绪,张涛.盱眙人工林枯落物及土壤水文效应研究[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(4):184-188.
[18] 剪文灏,李淑春,陈波,等.冀北山区3种典型森林类型枯落物水文效应研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(5):144-147.
[19] 刘凯,贺康宁,王先棒,等.青海高寒区不同密度白桦林枯落物水文效应[J].北京林业大学学报,2018,40(1):89-97.
[20] 石媛,鲁绍伟,陈波,等.河北雾灵山不同密度油松人工林枯落物及土壤水文效应[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(3):92-97.
[21] 周巧稚,毕华兴,孔凌霄,等.晋西黄土区不同密度刺槐林枯落物层水文生态功能研究[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(4):115-121.
[22] 赵阳,余新晓,吴海龙,等.华北土石山区典型森林枯落物层和土壤层水文效应[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(6):148-152.
[23] 吴迪,辛学兵,赵明扬,等.北京九龙山不同林分枯落物及土壤水文效应[J].林业科学研究,2014,27(3):417-422.
相似文献/References:
[1]李淑春,张伟,姚卫星,等.冀北山地不同林分类型林冠层降水分配研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(05):124.
LI Shu-chun,ZHANG Wei,YAO Wei-xing,et al.Precipitation Distribution Laws of Different Forest Stands in North Mountain of Hebei Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(06):124.
[2]王颖,杨新兵.冀北山地6种林分类型土壤水分-物理性质变化[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(03):108.
WANG Ying,YANG Xinbing.Soil Water-Physical Properties of Six Forest Types in Northern Mountain of Hebei Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(06):108.
[3]张宁,郭宾良,张楠,等.冀北山地落叶松四种典型林分生长发育比较研究[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(03):269.
ZHANG Ning,GUO Binliang,ZHANG Nan,et al.Comparative Study on Growth and Development of Four Typical Larch Stands in Mountain Area of Northern Hebei[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(06):269.
[4]赵建生,王永明,杨新兵.冀北山地森林土壤水文效应研究[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(03):201.
ZHAO Jian-sheng,WANG Yong-ming,YANG Xin-bing.Hydrological Effects of Forest Soil in Mountain Area of Northern Hebei[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(06):201.
[5]郑淼.冀北山地4种典型林分固碳释氧效益估算[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(03):154.
ZHENG Miao.Estimating the Benefits of Carbon Sequestration and Oxygen Release from Four Typical Stands in the Mountainous Region of North Hebei Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,26(06):154.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2019-11-07 修回日期:2020-01-05
资助项目:河北省林业和草原科学技术研究项目(1903003); 国家自然科学基金(31500523,31971644)
第一作者:塔莉(1978—),女,满族,吉林长春人,讲师,硕士,主要从事生态环境保护研究。E-mail:tali504@163.com
通信作者:张丽茹(1968—),女,满族,河北围场人,林业高级工程师,主要从事林业生产与森林生态研究。E-mail:2729915610@qq.com