[1]高 敏,王 勇,高 洁,等.喀斯特地区退耕还林工程下生态系统服务变化与关系分析[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(02):276-283.
　GAO Min,WANG Yong,GAO Jie,et al.Analysis on Changes and Relationship of Ecosystem Services in Karst Area Under the Project of Returning Farmland to Forest[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(02):276-283.
点击复制

喀斯特地区退耕还林工程下生态系统服务变化与关系分析

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 27 期数: 2020年02期 页码: 276-283 栏目: 出版日期: 2020-03-30
Title:
Analysis on Changes and Relationship of Ecosystem Services in Karst Area Under the Project of Returning Farmland to Forest
文章编号:
1005-3409(2020)02-0276-08
作者:
高 敏1,2, 王 勇1,2, 高 洁1,2, 王家录3, 毛 泳1,2
(1.西南大学 地理科学学院, 重庆 400715; 2.三峡库区生态环境教育部重点实验室, 重庆 400715; 3.安顺学院资源与环境工程学院, 贵州 安顺 561000)
Author(s):
GAO Min1,2, WANG Yong1,2, GAO Jie1,2, WANG Jialu3, MAO Yong1,2
(1.College of Geographical Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China; 2.Key Laboratory of Ecological Environment of Three Gorges Reservoir Area, Ministry of Education, Chongqing 400715, China; 3.School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Anshun University, Anshun, Guizhou 561000, China)
关键词:
生态系统服务;  权衡与协同关系;  InVEST模型;  热点区;  喀斯特地区
Keywords:
ecosystem services;  trade-offs and synergies;  InVEST model;  hot spot area;  karst region
分类号:
X171.1
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了给新形势下退耕还林工程的实施提供科学的理论依据,以贵州省安顺市普定县为研究区域,借助生态系统服务和交易的估价权衡模型(InVEST)测度了普定县1990年、2000年、2010年、2017年的土壤保持、产水量、碳储存和生境质量4项服务。结果表明:(1)产水量、碳储量、土壤保持和生境质量服务在3个时段生态系统服务变化指数(ESCI)的结果各不相同,如持平和倍增。增益及损失范围在空间分布上不相同,同种生态系统服务在不同的时间段上分布也不相同。(2)4种主导生态系统服务的分布格局也显示出显著的空间差别:土壤保持主导服务主要分布在山地林地地区; 产水量主导服务主要分布在山地林地、建设用地及裸地; 碳储量主导服务主要分布在林区; 生境质量主导服务分布在水域、林地、草地和耕地。(3)普定县土壤保持与碳储存服务、土壤保持与生境质量服务、碳储存与生境质量都存在明显的协同关系; 土壤保持与产水量存在较好的协同关系。(4)普定县4类及3类生态系统服务热点区主要分布在林地和草地地区,且随着退耕还林(草)政策的全面开展,4类及3类热点区面积逐年增加; 0类和1类服务热点区主要分布在普定县的建设用地、裸地及耕地地区。
Abstract:
In order to provide scientific theoretical basis for the implementation of the project of returning farmland to forest under the new situation, Puding County of Anshun City, Guizhou Province was taken as the research area, four services such as soil conservation, water yield, carbon storage and habitat quality in 1990, 2000, 2010 and 2017 in Puding County were measured by using the value trade-off model of ecosystem services and transactions(InVEST). The results showed that:(1)the ecosystem service change indexes(ESCI)of water yield, carbon storage, soil conservation and habitat quality service in the three periods were different, some indexes remained stable, and the others doubled. The gain and loss ranges were not the same in terms of spatial distribution, and the same kinds of ecosystem services had not the same distributions in different time periods;(2)The distribution patterns of the four dominant ecosystem services also presented the significant spatial heterogeneity; the leading service of water yield mainly distributed in mountainous forestland, construction land and bare land; carbon storage services mainly distributed in forest areas; habitat quality leading services distributed in water body, forestland, grassland and cultivated land;(3)there were obvious synergistic relationships between soil conservation and carbon storage service, soil conservation and habitat quality service, carbon storage and habitat quality in Puding County; there was a good synergistic relationship between soil conservation and water yield;(4)multiple ecosystem service supply of type 4 and type 3 of hot spots in Puding County mainly distributed in the forest and grassland areas, and with the comprehensive development of the policy of returning farmland to forest(grass), type 4 and type 4 of hot spots area increased year by year; Type 0 and type 1 hot spots mainly distributed in the construction land and cultivated land areas of Puding County.

参考文献/References:

[1] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Wetlands and Water Synthesis[M]. Washington D C: World Resources Institute, 2005.
[2] 苏维词.贵州喀斯特山区生态环境脆弱性及其生态整治[J].中国环境科学,2000,20(6):547-551.
[3] 张殿发,王世杰,李瑞玲.贵州省喀斯特山区生态环境脆弱性研究[J].地理学与国土研究,2002,18(1):77-79.
[4] Feng X, Fu B, Lu N, et al. How ecological restoration alters ecosystem services: an analysis of carbon sequestration in China's Loess Plateau[J]. Scientific Reports,2013,3.DOI:10.1038/srep02846.
[5] Rodríguez J P, Douglas B T, Bennett E M, et al. Trade-offs across Space, Time, and Ecosystem Services[J/OL]. Ecology and Society,2006,11(1):28.http:∥www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art28/.
[6] Foley J A. Global consequences of land use[J]. Science,2005,309(5734):570-574.
[7] Leea H, Lautenbacha S. A quantitative review of relationships between ecosystem services[J]. Ecological Indicators,2016,66:340-351.
[8] 李双成,张才玉,刘金龙,等.生态系统服务权衡与协同研究进展及地理学研究议题[J].生态学报,2017,37(21):7219-7231.
[9] 王蓓,赵军,胡秀芳.石羊河流域生态系统服务权衡与协同关系分析[J].生态学报,2018,38(21):7582-7595.
[10] 武文欢,彭建,刘焱序,等.鄂尔多斯市生态系统服务权衡与协同分析[J].地理科学进展,2017,36(12):1571-1581.
[11] 王壮壮,张立伟,李旭谱,等.流域生态系统服务热点与冷点时空格局特征[J].生态学报,2019,39(3):823-834.
[12] 潘竟虎,李真.干旱内陆河流域生态系统服务空间权衡与协同作用分析[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(17):280-289.
[13] Qiao X N, Gu Y Y, Zou C G, et al. Trade-offs and synergies of ecosystem services in the Taihu Lake Basin[J]. Chinese Geographical Science,2018,28(1):86-99.
[14] Yang X, Zhou Z, Li J, et al. Trade-offs between carbon sequestration, soil retention and water yield in the Guanzhong—Tianshui Economic Region of China[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences,2016,26(10):1449-1462.
[15] 张婷,侍昊,徐雁南,等.退耕还林对喀斯特地区土地利用景观格局影响的定量化评价[J].北京林业大学学报,2015,37(3):34-43.
[16] 郜红娟,张朝琼,王后阵,等.岩溶山区生态服务价值对退耕还林(草)工程的响应[J].贵州师范大学学报:自然科学版,2014,32(6):21-24.
[17] 焦树林,艾其帅.黔中喀斯特地区退耕还林项目的碳汇经济效益分析[J].生态经济,2011,244(10):69-72.
[18] 张博胜.退耕还林工程驱动下的中国西南喀斯特山区土地利用变化及其生态效应研究:以云南省文山县为例[D].昆明:云南财经大学,2010.
[19] Tian Y, Wang S, Bai X, et al. Trade-offs among ecosystem services in a typical Karst watershed, SW China[J]. Science of The Total Environment,2016,566:1297-1308.
[20] Yanqing L,Wei S. Trade-off Analysis of Ecosystem Services in a Mountainous Karst Area, China[J]. Water, 2018,10(3).DOI:10.3390/w10030300.
[21] 陈洪元.贵州喀斯特山区雨洪资源高效利用方法:以普定县陈家寨喀斯特石漠化示范区为例[J].贵州科学,2015,33(5):22-26.
[22] 钱彩云,巩杰,张金茜,等.甘肃白龙江流域生态系统服务变化及权衡与协同关系[J].地理学报,2018,73(5):868-879.
[23] 章文波,付金生.不同类型雨量资料估算降雨侵蚀力[J].资源科学,2003,25(1):37-38.
[24] 李默然,丁贵杰.贵州黔东南主要森林类型碳储量研究[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2013,33(7):119-124.
[25] 罗怀良,袁道先,陈浩.南川市三泉镇岩溶区农田生态系统有机碳密度[J].生态环境,2008,17(5):2014-2018.
[26] 解宪丽,孙波,周慧珍,等.中国土壤有机碳密度和储量的估算与空间分布分析[J].土壤学报,2004,41(1):35-43.
[27] 褚琳,张欣然,王天巍,等.基于CA-Markov和Invest模型的城市景观格局与生境质量时空演变及预测[J].应用生态学报,2018,29(12):4106-4118.
[28] 李晶,李红艳,张良.关中—天水经济区生态系统服务权衡与协同关系[J].生态学报,2016,36(10):3053-3062.
[29] 刘竞妍,张可,王桂华.综合评价中数据标准化方法比较研究[J].数字技术与应用,2018,36(8):84-85.
[30] 武文欢,彭建,刘焱序,等.鄂尔多斯市生态系统服务权衡与协同分析[J].地理科学进展,2017,36(12):1571-1581.

相似文献/References:

[1]梁春玲,谷胜利.南四湖湿地生态系统能值分析与区域发展[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(02):185.
　LIANG Chun-ling,GU Sheng-li.Analysis on Energy Value of Wetland Ecosystem of Nansi Lake in Shandong Province of China and Regional Development[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(02):185.
[2]王伟林,黄贤金,钟太洋.区域土地利用变化的生态系统服务价值响应——以南京市为例[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(01):212.
　WANG Wei-lin,HUANG Xian-jin,ZHONG Tai-yang.Area Land Use Change Responses to the Ecosystem Service Value—A Case Study of Nanjing City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(02):212.
[3]陈晓林,杨忠,熊东红,等.昌都地区生态系统服务功能价值评估[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(01):156.
　CHEN Xiao-lin,YANG Zhong,XIONG Dong-hong,et al.The Valuation of Ecosystem Services in Changdu, Tibet[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(02):156.
[4]郭兵,姜琳,孙彩红,等.基于多源数据的岷江上游生态系统服务价值动态评估[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(06):131.
　GUO Bing,JIANG Lin,SUN Caihong,et al.Dynamic Evaluation on Ecosystem Service Value of the Upper Reaches of Minjiang River Based on Multi-Source Data[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(02):131.
[5]吴丹,邵全琴,刘纪远,等.中国草地生态系统水源涵养服务时空变化[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(05):256.
　WU Dan,SHAO Quanqin,LIU Jiyuan,et al.Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Water Regulation Service of Grassland Ecosystem in China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(02):256.
[6]阿依努尔·艾尼,玉米提·哈力克,塔依尔江·艾山,等.利益相关者对塔里木河下游荒漠河岸林生态系统服务的认知度分析[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(01):205.
　Ayinuer·Aini,Umut·Halik,Tayierjiang·Aishan,et al.Analysis of Stakeholders’ Cognition on Desert Riparian Forest Ecosystem Services in the Lower Reaches of Tarim River, China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(02):205.
[7]杜国明,孙晓兵,刘彦随.延安市退耕对生态的影响及其人文驱动因素分析[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(03):233.
　DU Guoming,SUN Xiaobing,LIU Yansui.Analysis of Ecological Restoration on Ecosystem Services and Its Human Driving Factors in Yan’an City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(02):233.
[8]王敏,阮俊杰,姚佳,等.基于InVEST模型的生态系统土壤保持功能研究——以福建宁德为例[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(04):184.
　WANG Min,RUAN Jun-jie,YAO Jia,et al.Study on Soil Conservation Service of Ecosystem Based on InVEST Model—A Case Study of Ningde City, Fujian Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(02):184.
[9]周涛,李天宏.陕西省退耕还林(草)前后LUCC对生态系统服务的影响[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(01):246.
　ZHOU Tao,LI Tian-hong.Influence of Land Use/Cover Changes on Ecosystem Services in Shaanxi Province before and after Returning Farmland to Forest/Grass[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(02):246.
[10]牛志君,周亚鹏,王树涛,等.县域土地利用变化对碳储量的影响与评价——以黑龙港流域巨鹿县为例[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(03):292.
　NIU Zhijun,ZHOU Yapeng,WANG Shutao,et al.Influence and Evaluation of Land Use Change on Carbon Storage on County Scale—A Case Study of Julu County in Heilonggang Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(02):292.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2019-05-05 修回日期:2019-06-04 资助项目:重庆市发展和改革委员会学术委员会研究课题(4080491); 贵州省科技合作计划项目(黔科合LH字[2015]7702号,黔科合LH字[2017]7059号); 贵州省科技计划院士工作站项目(黔科合平台人才[2016]5602); 重庆市社会科学规划项目(2018PY60) 第一作者:高敏(1993—),女,山西太原人,硕士研究生,研究方向为地表环境与应用地理。E-mail:294453719@qq.com 通信作者:王勇(1975—),男,山西吕梁人,副教授,博士,主要从事地表环境与应用地理研究。E-mail:wy-ong@swu.edu.cn

更新日期/Last Update: 2020-02-25