ZHANG Te,LIU Ji,WEI Rong,et al.Response of Vegetation to Meteorological Drought in Upper Huaihe River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(02):213-219.
淮河上游植被对气象干旱的响应
- Title:
- Response of Vegetation to Meteorological Drought in Upper Huaihe River Basin
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2020)02-0213-07
- 分类号:
- P426
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 淮河流域是我国重要的农业基地之一,探究植被对气象干旱的响应规律有助于指导该地区的农业生产及生态保护。基于标准化降水蒸散指数(SPEI)和植被状态指数(VCI),采用线性趋势法探讨了淮河上游王家坝以上流域2000—2014年气象干旱及植被时空变化,并通过年最大相关系数(YRmax)和季最大相关系数(SRmax)分析了植被在年际和不同季节对气象干旱的响应特征。结果表明:(1)研究区SPEI整体以-0.089/a速率呈非显著干旱化趋势,淮河以北地区干旱化趋势相对明显;(2)研究区VCI整体以0.053/a速率呈显著上升趋势,整体植被状况逐渐好转,VCI显著下降的区域多分布于城镇附近;(3)年际上,78.4%的区域内VCI与SPEI显著相关,不同植被受气象干旱影响程度和敏感性整体差异不大;(4)春季和冬季植被受气象干旱影响的面积较广,分别有68.9%和64.8%的区域内VCI与SPEI显著相关,分布于流域西南、南部、北部和东部。夏季和秋季分别有31.3%和15.0%的区域内VCI与SPEI显著相关,夏季集中分布于流域中部,而秋季分布则比较零散;(5)春季和冬季不同植被的SRmax整体差异较小,春季冬小麦和草地对气象干旱比较敏感,而冬季各类植被的敏感性差异不大。夏季和秋季各类植被的SRmax整体上存在一定差异,但均未表现出显著相关性,植被普遍对4个月以下尺度的气象干旱敏感。2000—2014年淮河上游地区植被对气象干旱响应特征的空间差异性较大,研究结果可为变化环境下的农业生产和生态保护政策制定提供理论支撑。
- Abstract:
- Huaihe River Basin is one of the major agricultural bases in China. Exploring the response of vegetation to meteorological drought has guide significance for agricultural production and ecological protection in Huaihe River Basin. Based on the Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index(SPEI)and Vegetation Condition Index(VCI), the spatial-temporal variation characteristics of meteorological drought and vegetation in the area above Wangjiaba in upper Huaihe River Basin from 2000 to 2014 were discussed by liner trend, the responses of vegetation to meteorological drought in interannual and different seasons were also analyzed by annual maximum correlation coefficient(YRmax)and seasonal maximum correlation coefficient(SRmax). The result show that:(1)SPEI of study area presented a non-significant declining trend by the interannual change rate of -0.089/year, and the relatively significant decline area was the north of Huaihe River;(2)VCI of study area showed a significant increasing trend by the interannual change rate of 0.053 a, and the significant decline area concentrated in the vicinity of town;(3)on the interannual scale, there was 78.4% area where VCI was significantly correlated with SPEI, and there was no significant difference in impact and sensitivity of different vegetation to meteorological drought;(4)the area where the vegetation growth was more affected by meteorological drought in spring and winter was relatively larger, VCI and SPEI were significantly correlated in 68.9% and 64.8% of the whole area, these regions distributed in the southwest, south, north and east of the basin, respectively; there were 3 VCI were significantly correlated with SPEI in 31.3% and 15.0% of area in summer and autumn, respectively; in summer, the distribution concentrated in the middle of basin, but it scattered in autumn;(5)in spring and winter, the divergence of SRmax among different vegetation was small; wheat and grass were more sensitive to meteorological drought in spring, but the sensitivities of different types of vegetation were not significant in winter; the SRmax of various vegetation showed some differences in summer and autumn without significant correlation, and vegetation was generally sensitive to meteorological at the scale of less than 4 months. The response characteristics of vegetation to meteorological drought in the upper Huaihe River Basin had large difference in space from 2000 to 2014, these research results can provide theoretical support for formulating policy of agricultural production and ecological protection in the changing environment.
参考文献/References:
[1] Potter C, Klooster S, Hiatt C, et al. Changes in the carbon cycle of Amazon ecosystems during the 2010 drought[J]. Environmental Research Letters, 2011,6(3):329-346.
[2] Liang L, Zhao S H, Qin Z H, et al. Drought change trend using MODIS TVDI and its relationship with climate factors in china from 2001 to 2010[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2014,13(7):1501-1508.
[3] Smith A M S, Kolden C A, Tinkham W T, et al. Remote sensing the vulnerability of vegetation in natural terrestrial ecosystems[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2014,154:322-337.
[4] 郭佳香,王景才,周建康,等.基于SPI和HI的淮河上中游流域气象干旱特征分析[J].人民珠江,2017,38(10):36-41.
[5] 曹永强,邵文婷,曲本亮,等.基于修正Z指数的淮河流域干旱时空特性分析[J].中国水利水电科学研究院学报,2014,12(4):344-348.
[6] 王文,徐红.Palmer干旱指数在淮河流域的修正及应用[J].地球科学进展,2012,27(1):60-67.
[7] Vicente-Serrano S M, Beguería S, López-Moreno J I. A Multiscalar Drought Index Sensitive to Global Warming: The Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index[J]. Journal of Climate, 2010,23(7):1696-1718.
[8] 罗登泽,靳晓言,强皓凡,等.基于SPEI的若尔盖湿地干湿时空演变特征分析[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(2):227-233.
[9] 宋敏敏,张青峰,吴发启,等.基于NDVI的延河流域时空演变分析[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(4):6-11.
[10] 沙莎,郭铌,李耀辉,等.植被状态指数VCI与几种气象干旱指数的对比:以河南省为例[J].冰川冻土,2013,35(4):990-998.
[11] 胡君德,李百岁,萨楚拉,等.2000—2012年鄂尔多斯高原植被动态及干旱响应[J].测绘科学,2018,43(4):49-58.
[12] 赵舒怡.2001—2013年华北地区植被覆盖度与干旱条件的相关分析[J].地理学报,2015,70(5):717-729.
[13] 刘世梁,田韫钰,尹艺洁,等.云南省植被NDVI时间变化特征及其对干旱的响应[J].生态学报,2016,36(15):4699-4707.
[14] 严登明,翁白莎,于志磊,等.淮河流域土地利用时空格局动态及其植被覆盖变化分析[J].中国农村水利水电,2016(11):52-57.
[15] 姚筠,许莹,马晓群,等.淮河流域降水变化对主要农作物气候生产潜力的限制[J].资源科学,2017,39(3):490-500.
[16] Quiring S M, Ganesh S. Evaluating the utility of the Vegetation Condition Index(VCI)for monitoring meteorological drought in Texas[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2010,150(3):330-339.
[17] Zhang Q, Kong D, Singh V P, et al. Response of vegetation to different time-scales drought across China: Spatiotemporal patterns, causes and implications[J]. Global and Planetary Change, 2017,152:1-11.
[18] 叶金印,黄勇,张春莉,等.近50年淮河流域气候变化时空特征分析[J].生态环境学报,2016,25(1):84-91.
[19] 谷金芝,宫兆宁.2001—2015年华北平原植被覆盖度时空变化特征及影响因素分析[J].测绘与空间地理信息,2018,47(8):47-51.
[20] Xu K, Yang D, Yang H, et al. Spatio-temporal variation of drought in China during 1961—2012:A climatic perspective[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2015,526:253-264.
相似文献/References:
[1]刘永婷,徐光来,李鹏,等.淮河上游径流年内分配均匀度及变化规律[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(05):99.
LIU Yongting,XU Guanglai,LI Peng,et al.Study on Runoff Uniformity and Variation in the Upper Reaches of Huaihe River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(02):99.
[2]孔令颖,扶松林,韩晓阳,等.基于传统干湿指数的省域长历时气象干旱变化特征及其对旱作粮食单产的影响[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(03):159.
KONG Lingying,FU Songlin,HAN Xiaoyang,et al.Spatiotemporal Variation of Long-term Meteorological Drought and Its Impacts on Grain Yield in Shaanxi Province Based on the Traditional Arid-Wet Index[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(02):159.
[3]杨铭珂,贺中华,任荣仪.黔中地区气象水文干旱演变特征及其响应关系[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(01):264.
YANG Mingke,HE Zhonghua,REN Rongyi.Evolution Characteristics of Meteorological and Hydrological Drought and Their Response Relations in Central Guizhou[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(02):264.
[4]游 漫,贺中华,张 浪,等.基于相对湿润指数的贵州省气象干旱时空变化特征研究[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(04):255.
YOU Man,HE Zhonghua,ZHANG Lang,et al.Spatiotemporal Variation Characteristics of Meteorological Drought in Guizhou Province Based on Relative Humidity Index[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(02):255.
[5]潘 杉,贺中华,陈莉会,等.基于不同时间尺度的贵州省近50年气象干旱时空演化特征[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(03):279.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.03.033]
PAN Shan,HE Zhonghua,CHEN Lihui,et al.Spatiotemporal Evolution Characteristics of Meteorological Drought in Guizhou Province in Recent 50 Years Based on Different Time Scales[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(02):279.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.03.033]
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2019-06-26 修回日期:2019-07-21 资助项目:国家自然科学基金(51709151); 国家重点研发计划课题(2017YFC0405606); 三峡大学硕士学位论文培优基金(2019SSPY001) 第一作者:张特(1996—),男,湖北宜昌人,硕士研究生,主要从事水文水资源方面研究。E-mail:961740186@qq.com 通信作者:刘冀(1980—),男,河北保定人,博士,副教授,主要从事流域水文模拟与防洪调度研究。E-mail:liuji@ctgu.edu.cn