FANG Xin,GUO Xuelian,ZHENG Rongbo,et al.Effect of Difference Grazing Distributions on Soil Ecological Stoichiometric Characteristics in Peatland of Northwest Yunnan Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(02):9-14.
不同放牧干扰对滇西北高原泥炭沼泽土壤生态化学计量特征的影响
- Title:
- Effect of Difference Grazing Distributions on Soil Ecological Stoichiometric Characteristics in Peatland of Northwest Yunnan Plateau
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2020)02-0009-06
- 分类号:
- S152; S153; S154.1
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 为了阐明放牧过程对泥炭沼泽土壤化学计量特征的影响及机制,为放牧对湿地生态系统干扰及泥炭沼泽养分循环研究提供理论基础。以滇西北高原泥炭沼泽为研究对象,分析了土壤含水率、pH值、总有机碳(TOC)、总氮(TN)、总磷(TP)、铵态氮(NH+4-N)、硝态氮(NO-3-N)及土壤碳(C)、氮(N)、磷(P)生态化学计量特征,从而研究了放牧过程中藏猪翻拱(ZG)和牦牛践踏(JT)对泥炭沼泽土壤化学计量特征的影响。结果表明:放牧降低了土壤含水率、pH值、TN、TOC含量,增加了TP含量; ZG显著增加了NO-3-N含量。放牧降低了土壤养分化学计量,其中ZG和JT的C/P存在显著差异(p<0.05); 放牧降低了微生物生物量碳氮比(MBC/MBN)及微生物生物量碳磷比(MBC/MBP),却提高了微生物生物量氮磷比(MBN/MBP),其中ZG对微生物生态化学计量的影响显著高于JT; 放牧增加了生态酶化学计量。冗余分析显示TP、含水率、容重、NO-3-N、TOC是主要影响化学计量的环境因子。MBC/MBN,MBN/MBP均与对应的生态酶化学计量呈正相关,然而MBC/MBP呈相反趋势。C/N,C/P均与对应的生态酶化学计量呈正相关,然而N/P与对应的生态酶活性呈负相关。土壤养分化学计量变化影响了微生物生态化学计量以及生态酶化学计量。
- Abstract:
- In order to clarify the influence and mechanism of grazing process on the stoichiometric characteristics of peat swamp soil, provide theoretical basis for the research on disturbance of grazing to wetland ecosystem and nutrient cycling of peatland, a typical peatland was selected to study the effect of pig arching(ZG)and yak trampling(JT)on soil ecological stoichiometric characteristics in northwestern Yunnan plateau, and the contents of moisture, pH value, soil total organic carbon(TOC), total nitrogen(TN), total phosphorus(TP), ammonium(NH+4-N), nitrate(NO-3-N)and soil ecological stoichiometric characteristics were investigated. The results showed that livestock grazing reduced soil moisture, pH value, TN, TOC, but increased TP, the soil NO-3-N was increased by ZG, grazing reduced soil nutrient stoichiometry, and there was a significant difference in C/P between JT and ZG (p<0.05); grazing decreased MBC/MBN and MBC/MBP, but increased MBN/MBP; ZG had stronger effects on microbial ecological stoichiometry than JT; grazing increased soil ecoenzyme stoichiometry. Redundancy analysis showed that TP, moisture, bulk density, NO-3-N and TOC were primary environmental factors affecting soil ecological stoichiometry. The MBC/MBN and MBN/MBP were positively related to the ecological enzyme stoichiometry, while the MBC/MBP showed the opposite trend. N/P was negatively correlated with the ecological enzyme activity, the soil C/N and C/P were positively correlated with ecoenzyme stoichiometry. The changes of soil nutrient stoichiometry affected microbial ecological stoichiometry and ecoenzyme stoichiometry.
参考文献/References:
[1] Deng Q, Cheng X, Hui D, et al. Soil microbial community and its interaction with soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics following afforestation in central China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2016,541:230-237.
[2] 周正虎,王传宽.微生物对分解底物碳氮磷化学计量的响应和调节机制[J].植物生态学报,2016,40(6):620-630.
[3] Peng X, Wang W. Stoichiometry of soil extracellular enzyme activity along a climatic transect in temperate grasslands of northern China[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2016,98:74-84.
[4] Saiya-Cork K, Sinsabaugh R, Zak D. The effects of long term nitrogen deposition on extracellular enzyme activity in an Acer saccharum forest soil[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2002,34(9):1309-1315.
[5] Elser J J, Dobberfuhl D R, Mackay N A, et al. Organism size, life history, and N:P stoichiometry: toward a unified view of cellular and ecosystem processes[J]. Bioscience, 1996,46(9):674-684.
[6] Sinsabaugh R L, Hill B H, Shah J J F. Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry of microbial organic nutrient acquisition in soil and sediment[J]. Nature, 2009,462(7274).DOI:10.1038/nature08632.
[7] Xu Z, Yu G, Zhang X, et al. Soil enzyme activity and stoichiometry in forest ecosystems along the North-South Transect in eastern China(NSTEC)[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2017,104:152-163.
[8] 肖德荣,田昆,杨宇明,等.高原退化湿地纳帕海植物多样性格局特征及其驱动力[J].生态环境学报,2007,16(2):523-529.
[9] 范桥发,肖德荣,田昆,等.不同放牧对滇西北高原典型湿地土壤碳、氮空间分布的差异影响[J].土壤通报,2014,45(5):1151-1156.
[10] Gorham E. Northern peatlands: role in the carbon cycle and probable responses to climatic warming[J]. Ecological Applications, 1991,1(2):182-195.
[11] 姚茜,田昆,肖德荣,等.纳帕海湿地植物多样性及土壤有机质对猪拱干扰的响应[J].生态学杂志,2015,34(5):1218-1222.
[12] 鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].3版.北京:中国农业出版社,2007.
[13] Huang Z, Wan X, He Z, et al. Soil microbial biomass, community composition and soil nitrogen cycling in relation to tree species in subtropical China[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2013,62:68-75.
[14] Vance E D, Brookes P C, Jenkinson D S. An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1987,19(6):703-707.
[15] Brookes P, Landman A, Pruden G, et al. Chloroform fumigation and the release of soil nitrogen:a rapid direct extraction method to measure microbial biomass nitrogen in soil[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1985,17(6):837-842.
[16] Brookes P, Powlson D, Jenkinson D. Measurement of microbial biomass phosphorus in soil[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1982,14(4):319-329.
[17] 贾国梅,席颖,许文年,等.三峡库区消落带土壤酶活性特征[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(4):24-28.
[18] 王雪,郭雪莲,郑荣波,等.放牧对滇西北高原纳帕海沼泽化草甸湿地土壤氮转化的影响[J].生态学报,2018,38(7):2308-2314.
[19] 张建文,徐长林,杨海磊,等.高寒草甸冷季放牧对凋落物分解及C, N, P化学计量特征的影响[J].草业科学,2017,34(10):37-44.
[20] Seybold C A, Mersie W, Huang J, et al. Soil redox, pH, temperature, and water-table patterns of a freshwater tidal wetland[J]. Wetlands, 2002,22(1):149-158.
[21] Sun Y, He X Z, Hou F, et al. Grazing increases litter decomposition rate but decreases nitrogen release rate in an alpine meadow[J]. Biogeosciences, 2018,15(13):4233-4243.
[22] Wang X K, Li Z B, Xing Y Y. Effects of mulching and nitrogen on soil temperature, water content, nitrate-N content and maize yield in the Loess Plateau of China[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2015,161:53-64.
[23] Tian H, Chen G, Zhang C, et al. Pattern and variation of C:N:P ratios in China's soils: a synthesis of observational data[J]. Biogeochemistry, 2010,98(1/3):139-151.
[24] 张仲胜,吕宪国,薛振山,等.中国湿地土壤碳氮磷生态化学计量学特征研究[J].土壤学报,2016,53(5):1160-1169.
[25] Han W, Luo Y, Du G. Effects of clipping on diversity and above-ground biomass associated with soil fertility on an alpine meadow in the eastern region of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau[J]. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 2007,50(3):361-368.
[26] Paul E A. Soil Microbiology, Ecology and Biochemistry[M]. New York. USA: Academic Press, 2014.
[27] 赵先丽,程海涛,吕国红,等.土壤微生物生物量研究进展[J].气象与环境学报,2006,22(4):68-72.
[28] 贝昭贤,张秋芳,郑蔚,等.模拟增温对中亚热带杉木人工林土壤磷有效性的影响[J].生态学报,2018,38(3):1106-1113.
[29] 隋鹏祥,张心昱,温学发,等.耕作方式和秸秆还田对棕壤土壤养分和酶活性的影响[J].生态学杂志,2016,35(8):2038-2045.
[30] Vitousek P M, Porder S, Houlton B Z, et al. Terrestrial phosphorus limitation: mechanisms, implications, and nitrogen-phosphorus interactions[J]. Ecological Applications, 2010,20(1):5-15.
[31] Anderson T-H, Domsch K H. Ratios of microbial biomass carbon to total organic carbon in arable soils[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1989,21(4):471-479.
[32] Zhao F, Ren C, Han X, et al. Changes of soil microbial and enzyme activities are linked to soil C, N and P stoichiometry in afforested ecosystems[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2018,427:289-295.
相似文献/References:
[1]苗翻,杨新国,古君龙,等.放牧干扰下短花针茅植丛对表层土壤性质的影响[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(03):49.
MIAO Fan,YANG Xinguo,GU Junlong,et al.Effect of Grazing on the Properties of Surface Soil in the Land Growing Stipa breviflora[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,26(02):49.
[2]胡贵锋,王新军,常梦迪,等.评估放牧干扰对天山北坡土壤侵蚀及空间特征的影响[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(05):13.
HU Guifeng,WANG Xinjun,CHANG Mengdi,et al.Assessment on the Impact of Grazing Disturbance on Spatial Characteristics of Soil Erosion on the Northern Slope of Tianshan Mountains[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(02):13.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2019-04-09 修回日期:2019-06-14 资助项目:国家自然科学基金(41563008); 云南省高原湿地科学创新团队(2012HC007) 第一作者:方昕(1994—),男,四川西昌人,硕士研究生,研究方向为湿地土壤微生物。E-mail:xcfangxin@163.com 通信作者:郭雪莲(1979—),女,吉林通榆人,副教授,硕士生导师,主要从事湿地生态学和生物地球化学研究。E-mail:guoxuelian2009@hotmail.com