[1]冯莉莉,贾志清,刘涛,等.高寒沙区几种典型固沙植物细根生物量及周转速率比较[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(02):120-125,130.
　FENG Lili,JIA Zhiqing,LIU Tao,et al.Comparative Study on Fine Roots Productivity and Turnover Rates of Several Typical Sand-Fixation Plants in Alpine Sandy Land[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(02):120-125,130.
点击复制

高寒沙区几种典型固沙植物细根生物量及周转速率比较

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 25 期数: 2018年02期 页码: 120-125,130 栏目: 出版日期: 2018-04-03
Title:
Comparative Study on Fine Roots Productivity and Turnover Rates of Several Typical Sand-Fixation Plants in Alpine Sandy Land
作者:
冯莉莉1,2,3, 贾志清2,3, 刘涛4, 李清雪2,3, 张友焱2,3, 石坤5, 何凌仙子2,3, 杨凯悦2,3
1. 河北工程大学 矿业与测绘工程学院, 河北 邯郸 056038;
2. 中国林业科学研究院 荒漠化研究所, 北京 100091;
3. 青海共和荒漠生态系统定位观测研究站, 青海 共和 813005;
4. 中国林业科学研究院 林业研究所, 北京 100091;
5. 北京林业大学 水土保持学院, 北京 100083
Author(s):
FENG Lili1,2,3, JIA Zhiqing2,3, LIU Tao4, LI Qingxue2,3, ZHANG Youyan2,3, SHI Kun5, HE Lingxianzi2,3, YANG Kaiyue2,3
1. School of Mining and Geomatics Engineering, Hebei University of Engineering, Handan, Hebei 056038, China;
2. Institute of Desertification Studies, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China;
3. Qinghai Gonghe Desert Ecosystem Research Station, Gonghe, Qinghai 813005, China;
4. Research Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China;
5. College of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
关键词:
固沙植物; 细根生物量; 细根周转速率; 钻土芯法; 高寒沙区
Keywords:
sand-fixation plants; fine roots productivity; fine roots turnover rates; sequential soil coring method; alpine sandy land
分类号:
S718.5;S157.4
摘要:
利用钻土芯法获取了6-8月不同固沙植物的细根，并确定其生物量分布。采用极差法和矩阵法计算了不同固沙植物的细根周转速率。结果表明：不同固沙植物的细根生物量主要分布在0-40 cm的深度。在沙丘上，不同固沙植物细根周转速率的相对顺序为：沙蒿（Artemisia desertorum）混交林 > 沙蒿 > 柠条锦鸡儿（Caragana korshinskii） > 中间锦鸡儿（Caragana intermedia）混交林 > 中间锦鸡儿，从结果来看低矮的沙蒿相对于高大的柠条锦鸡儿或者中间锦鸡儿具有较高的细根周转速率。在丘间地上，不同固沙植物细根周转速率的相对顺序为：沙柳（Salix psammophila） > 小穗柳（Salix microstachya） > 乌柳（Salix cheilophila）混交林 > 小叶杨（Populus simonii）混交林 > 乌柳 > 小叶杨，从结果来看沙柳的细根周转速率明显大于其他几种固沙植物，而高大的乔木小叶杨具有较低的细根周转速率。无论是在沙丘还是丘间地上，混交林的细根周转速率都要大于纯林。高寒沙区典型固沙植物的细根生物量及周转速率研究为该区域植被细根的养分循环、碳平衡等相关研究提供理论依据。
Abstract:
Sequential coring method was used to collect the fine roots data from June to August in alpine sandy land. Turnover rates were calculated by maximum or mean biomass during the growing season in 2015 using Decision Matrix (DM) or maximum-minimum (MM) method. In vertical direction, fine roots mainly distribute in 0-40 cm soil layer. On moving sand dune, the fine roots turnover rates among species decreased in the sequence of Artemisia desertorum(mixed) > Artemisia desertorum > Caragana korshinskii > Caragana intermedia(mixed) > Caragana intermedia. Fine roots turnover rates of Artemisia desertorum are higher than those of Caragana intermedia and Caragana korshinskii on moving sand dune. On the interdune, the fine roots turnover rates among species deduced in the order:Salix psammophila > Salix microstachya > Salix cheilophila (mixed) > Populus simonii (mixed) > Salix cheilophila > Populus simonii. Fine roots turnover rates of Salix psammophila are higher than those of the other sand-fixation plants. Fine roots turnover rates of Populus simonii are the lowest. Mixed forest has more advantages compared to pure forest in alpine sandy land. This study is significant to provide a theoretical basis for nutrient cycling and carbon balance of fine roots in this region.

参考文献/References:

[1] 吴伊波,车荣晓,马双,等.高寒草甸植被细根生产和周转的比较研究[J].生态学报,2014,34(13):3529-3537.
[2] 陈曦,张乃莉,周晓梅,等.细根分解研究进展及存在问题[J].吉林师范大学学报:自然科学版,2012(2):36-40.
[3] Aber J D, Melillo J M, Nadelhoffer K J, et al. Fine root turnover in forest ecosystems in relation to quantity and from of N availability:a comparison of two methods[J]. Oecologia, 1985,66(3):317-321.
[4] Shaver G R, Billings W D. Relationships among root branch order, carbon, and nitrogen in four temperate species[J]. Oecologia, 1975,111(3):302-308.
[5] Vogt K A, Grier C C, Vogt D J. Production, turnover and nutritional dynamics of aboveground and belowground detritus of world forest[J]. Advances in Ecological Research, 1986,15(15):303-377.
[6] Gill R A, Jackson R B. Global patterns of root turnover for terrestrial ecosystems[J]. New Phytologist, 2000,147(1):13-31.
[7] Majdi H, Pregitzer K, Morén A S, et al. Measuring fine root turnover in forest ecosystems[J]. Plant and Soil, 2005,276(1/2):1-8.
[8] Hendrick R L, Pregitzer K S. Patterns of fine root mortality in two sugar maple forests[J]. Nature, 1993,361(6407):59-61.
[9] Jackson R B, Mooney H A, Schulze E D. A global budget for fine root biomass, surface area, and nutrient contents[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1997,94(14):7362-7366.
[10] Gaudinski J B, Trumbore S E, Davidson E A. The age of fine-root carbon in three forests of the eastern United States measured by radiocarbon[J]. Oecologia, 2001,129(3):420-429.
[11] Trumbore S E, Gaudinski J B. The secret lives of roots[J]. Science, 2003,302(5649):1344-1345.
[12] Tingey D T, Phillips D L, Johnson M G. Optimizing minirhizotron sample frequency for an evergreen and deciduous tree species[J]. New Phytologist, 2003,157(1):155-161.
[13] Ostonen I, Lõhmus K, Pajuste K. Fine root biomass, production and its proportion of NPP in a fertile middle-aged Norway spruce forest:comparison of soil core and ingrowth core methods[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2005,212(1):264-277.
[14] Xiao C W, Sang W G, Wang R Z. Fine root dynamics and turnover rate in an Asia white birch forest of Donglingshan Mountain, China[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2008,255(3):765-773.
[15] Böhm W. Maduakor H and Taylor H M. Comparison of five methods for characterizing soybean rooting density and development[J]. Agronomy Journal,1977,69(3):415-419.
[16] Samson B K, Sinclair T R. Soil core and minirhizotron comparison for the determination of root length density[J]. Plant and Soil, 1994,161(2):225-232.
[17] Vogt K A, Vogt D J, Bloomfield J. Analysis of some direct and indirect methods fox estimating root biomass and production of forests at an ecosystem level[J]. Plant and Soil, 1998,200:71-89.
[18] Friend A L, Eide M R, Hinckley T M. Nitrogen stress alters root proliferation in Douglas-fir seedlings[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 1990,20(9):1524-1529.
[19] Steele S J, Gower S T, Vogel J G, et al. Root mass, net primary production and turnover in aspen, jack pine and black spruce forests in Saskatchewan and Manitoba, Canada[J]. Tree Physiology, 1997,17(8/9):577-587.
[20] Van Rees K C J. Soil temperature effects from minirhizotron lighting systems[J]. Plant and Soil, 1998,200(1):113-118.
[21] Hendrick R L, Pregitzer K S. Applications of minirhizotrons to understand root function in forests and othernatural ecosystems[J]. Plant and Soil, 1996,185(2):293-304.
[22] Hendrick R L, Pregitzer K S. The dynamics of fine root, length, biomass, and nitrogen content in two northern hardwood ecosystems[J]. Can. J. for. Res, 1993,23(12):2507-2520.
[23] Rytter R M, Hansson A C. Seasonal amount, growth and depth distribution of fine roots in an irrigated and fertilized, Salix viminalis L. plantation[J]. Biomass and Bioenergy, 1996,11(2/3):129-137.
[24] Burke M K, Raynal D J. Fine root growth phenology, production, and turnover in a northern hardwood forest ecosystems[J]. Plant and Soil, 1994,162(1):135-146.
[25] 杨世琦,高旺盛,隋鹏,等.共和盆地土地沙漠化因素定量研究[J].生态学报,2005,25(12):3181-3187.
[26] 张东杰.共和盆地近50年来草地荒漠化驱动因素定量研究[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(4):166-169.
[27] 封建民,李晓华.近15年来共和盆地土地沙质荒漠化动态变化及原因分析[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(5):129-133.
[28] 魏占雄.高寒沙区生态恢复对植物物种多样性的影响[J].草业与畜牧,2009(7):36-51.
[29] 魏婷婷.共和盆地沙质荒漠化过程植被群落特征变化[J].生态环境学报,2011,20(12):1788-1793.
[30] 张永秀.青海共和盆地高寒流动沙丘快速治理技术[J].青海大学学报:自然科学版,2009,27(4):56-64.
[31] 韩晓玲.共和盆地沙化土地现状及治理途径初探[J].防护林科技,2010(1):106-108.
[32] Jia Z Q, Zhu Y J, Liu L Y. Different water use strategies of juvenile and adult Caragana intermedia plantations in the Gonghe Basin, Tibet Plateau[J]. Plos One, 2012,7(9):e45902.
[33] 刘丽颖,贾志清,朱雅娟,等.高寒沙地不同林龄中间锦鸡儿的水分利用策略[J].干旱区资源与环境,2012,26(5):119-125.
[34] 朱宏.正态格拉布斯统计量的近似分布[J].电子科技大学学报,1990,19(3):279-283.
[35] 张琳琳.长期大风对霸王根系分布的影响[D].乌鲁木齐:新疆师范大学,2014.
[36] 石坤,贾志清,张洪江,等.青海共和盆地典型固沙植物根系分布特征[J].中国水土保持科学,2016(6):78-85.

相似文献/References:

[1]吴春荣,邢彩萍.祁连山三种主要乔木林细根生物量比较[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(05):325.
　WU Chunrong,XING Caiping.Comparison of Fine Root Biomass of Three Main Arbors in Qilian Mountains[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(02):325.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2017-4-17;改回日期:2017-5-15。
基金项目:林业公益性行业科研专项“青海共和盆地典型固沙植物根系特征及功能研究”（201504420）；国家自然科学基金（31670706，31600585）
作者简介:冯莉莉(1986-),女,吉林四平人,博士,研究方向为水土保持与荒漠化防治。E-mail:fenglili_caf@163.com
通讯作者:贾志清(1968-),女,北京人,博士,研究员,主要从事水土保持与荒漠化防治研究。E-mail:jiazq@caf.ac.cn

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01