PENG Shunlei,CHEN Changdong,LI Lei,et al.Comparison of Community Characteristics Between Quercus variables Forests Through Artificial Restoration and Natural restoration in Baotianman Nature Reserve[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(06):265-270.
宝天曼自然保护区栓皮栎林人工恢复与天然恢复效果比较
- Title:
- Comparison of Community Characteristics Between Quercus variables Forests Through Artificial Restoration and Natural restoration in Baotianman Nature Reserve
- Keywords:
- Quercus variables; planted forest; secondary natural forest; importance value; species diversity; soil physical and chemical property
- 分类号:
- Q948.1
- 摘要:
- 为比较宝天曼自然保护区内栓皮栎林人工恢复天然恢复的差异，采用样地调查法对相同恢复年限的栓皮栎人工林与天然次生林的物种组成、重要值、多样性指数和土壤性质等群落特征指标进行了比较研究。结果表明：（1）栓皮栎人工林群落具有维管束植物12科18属24种，次生林群落具有维管束植物27科40属48种，两个群落相似性较低（0.36）；（2）栓皮栎次生林乔木层和灌木层物种的重要值比人工林低，乔木层和灌木层的物种数较人工林多；（3）栓皮栎人工林与次生林群落的乔木层、灌木层和草本层的Maglef指数、Shannon-Wiener指数、Simpson和Pielou均匀度指数相比均较低，人工林的4个多样性指数大小依次为灌木层、草本层、乔木层，天然次生林指数大小表现依次为灌木层、乔木层、草本层；（4）栓皮栎次生林的土壤全氮、全磷、有机质含量比人工林均较高。研究表明在宝天曼自然保护区内，相同恢复的年限，栓皮栎天然次生林无论物种组成、多样性指数、群落结构和土壤理化性质均优于栓皮栎人工林，天然恢复比人工造林恢复效果好。
- Abstract:
- To understand the difference of community characteristics between the planted Quercus variables forest and secondary natural forest, and to provide reference for forest restoration, plot survey method was used to compare the community characteristics, such as species composition, important value, diversity indexes and soil properties of Quercus variables planted forest with secondary natural forest in the same age of 50 years in Baotianman Nature Reserve. The results showed as follows. (1) Quercus variables secondary natural forest consisted of 48 vascular species in 27 families and 40 genera, whereas the planted forest included 24 vascular species in 12 families and 18 genera, similarity index was very low with value of 0.36 between two communities. (2) important value in the arbor and shrub layers of Quercus variabilis secondary natural forest were lower than that of planted forest, which indicated that species richness in the arbor and shrub layers of Quercus variabilis secondary natural forest was greater than that of planted forest. (3) The Maglef index, Simpson index, Shannon-Weiner index and Pielou evenness index of arbor, shrub and herb of Quercus variables planted forest were lower than those of secondary natural forest. In the planted forest, the four diversity indexes were in the order:shrub layer > herb layer > arbor layer, while in secondary forest the indexes were in the order:shrub layer > arbor layer > herb layer. (4) Soil bulk density of Quercus variables natural secondary was lower than that of the planted forest, the TN, TP and SOM of Quercus variables natural secondary forest were greater than those of the planted forest. This study suggested that species composition, diversity index, community structure and soil properties of Quercus variables secondary natural forest were better than planted Quercus variables forest at the same restoration ages, and forest natural restoration was more superior than afforestation in Baotainman Nature Reserve.
参考文献/References:
[1] Peterken G. Natural Woodland:Ecology and Conservation in Northern Temperate Regions[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1996.
[2] Hobbs R J, Arico S, Aronson J, et al. Novel ecosystems:theoretical and management aspects of the new ecological world order[J]. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2006,15(1):1-7.
[3] 张永利,鲁绍伟,杨峰伟.华北土石山区人工林与天然林结构与功能研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2007,26(6):63-68.
[4] 邢韶华,姬文元,郭宁,等.川西米亚罗林区云杉天然林与人工林的群落特征比较[J].山地学报,2010,28(2):218-225.
[5] 陈辉.33年生格氏栲人工林与天然林群落特征比较[J].福建林学院学报,2009,29(2):155-159.
[6] 赵娜,李玉灵,张劲松,等.冀北山地天然林与人工林植被物种多样性研究[J].西北林学院学报,2011,26(2):15-21.
[7] Duan R Y, Wang C, Wang X A, et al. Differences in plant species diversity between conifer(Pinus tabulaeformis)plantations and natural forests in middle of the Loess plateau[J]. Russian Journal of Ecology, 2009,40(7):501-509.
[8] 李裕元,郑纪勇,邵明安.子午岭天然林与人工林群落特征比较研究[J].西北植物学报,2005,25(12):2447-2456.
[9] 彭舜磊,王得祥.秦岭火地塘林区华山松人工林与天然次生林群落特征比较[J].西北植物学报,2009,29(11):2301-2311.
[10] 王健敏,刘娟,陈晓鸣,等.云南松天然林及人工林群落结构和物种多样性比较[J].林业科学研究,2010,23(4):515-522.
[11] 王周旭,于宁楼.北京九龙山人工林和天然次生林的土壤物理性状[J].林业资源管理,2007,8(4):89-92.
[12] 王小红,杨智杰,刘小飞,等.天然林转换成人工林对土壤团聚体稳定性及有机碳分布的影响[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(6):177-182.
[13] Luan J W, Xiang C H, Liu S R. Assessments of the impacts of Chinese fir plantation and natural regenerated forest on soil organic matter quality at Longmen mountain, Sichuan, China[J]. Geoderma, 2010,56(3/4):228-236.
[14] Michelsen A, Lisanework N, Friis I. Comparisons of understorey vegetation and soil fertility in plantations and adjacent natural forests in the Ethiopian Highlands[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 1996,33(3):627-629.
[15] Ruiz-Jaen M C, Potvin C. Can we predict carbon stocks in tropical ecosystems from tree diversity?Comparing species and functional diversity in a plantation and a natural forest[J]. New Phytologist, 2011,189(4):978-987.
[16] 钱宝,刘凌,肖潇.土壤有机质测定方法对比分析[J].河海大学学报:自然科学版,2011,39(1):34-38.
[17] 张万儒.中国森林土壤定位研究方法[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1986.
[18] 王伯荪.植物群落学[M].北京:高,等教育出版社,1987.
[19] Liu Y, Lin K C, Vadeboncoeur M A, Chen M Z, et al. Understorey plant community and light availability in conifer plantations and natural hardwood forests in Taiwan[J]. Applied Vegetation Science, 2015,18(4):311-316.
[20] 郭剑芬,杨玉盛,陈光水,等.格氏栲天然林与人工林枯枝落叶层和粗木质残体有机化学组成研究[J].亚热带资源与环境学报,2008,3(3):40-45.
相似文献/References:
[1]胡建忠.山杨混交类型生产力及土壤质量综合评价[J].水土保持研究,1995,2(01):44.
Hu Jianzhong.Integrative Evaluation on Soil Quality and productivity of Populus davidiana Dode Mixed Forest[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1995,2(06):44.
[2]章异平,徐军亮,康慕谊,等.近自然林业的研究进展[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(03):214.
ZHANG Yi-ping,XU Jun-liang,KANG Mu-yi,et al.Review on Progress in Near-Nature Forestry[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(06):214.
[3]尹娜,魏天兴,张晓娟.黄土丘陵区人工林土壤养分效应研究[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(02):209.
YIN Na,WEI Tian-xing,ZHANG Xiao-juan.The Characteristics of Soil Nutrient in Artificial Forest Land in the Hilly Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(06):209.
[4]岳学文,方海东,钱坤建,等.金沙江干热河谷人工林土壤水分研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(02):125.
YUE Xue-wen,QIAN Kun-jian,FANG Jin,et al.A Study on Soil Moisture in Different Plantations in Dry-Hot Valley of Jinsha River[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(06):125.
[5]吴光艳,成婧,祝振华,等.黄土高原南部人工林林冠对降雨特征的影响分析[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(04):32.
WU Guang-yan,CHENG Jing,ZHU Zhen-hua,et al.Rainfall Characteristics under Canopy of Plantation Forest in the Southern Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(06):32.
[6]何聪,熊伟,王彦辉,等.六盘山北侧华北落叶松林分的水分利用效率研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(05):112.
HE Cong,XIONG Wei,WANG Yan-hui,et al.The Water Use Efficiency of Larix principis-rupprechtii Plantation in the Northern Liupan Mountain[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(06):112.
[7]于法展,李保杰,尤海梅,等.徐州泉山自然保护区人工林下土壤容重与孔隙度时空变化研究[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(06):164.
YU Fa-zhan,LI Bao-jie,YOU Hai-mei,et al.Study on Spatial-Temporal Changes on Undergrowth the Plantation Soil Bulk Density and Soil Porosity of Quanshan Nature Reserve in Xuzhou[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(06):164.
[8]胡建忠,付良勇,寇权.陇东黄土丘陵沟壑区山坡地人工沙棘林地土壤酶活性的季节性变化规律[J].水土保持研究,1998,5(04):83.
Hu Jianzhong,Fu Liangyong,Kou Quan.The Seasonal Change of Soil Enzyme Activity of Artificial Hippophase Forest in Slope Land of Gully-hilly Loess Plateau, Northern China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1998,5(06):83.
[9]陈苗苗,刘桂民,刘德玺,等.不同人工林对黄河三角洲滨海盐碱地土壤理化性质的影响[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(06):41.
CHEN Miaomiao,LIU Guimin,LIU Dexi,et al.Effect of Different Plantations on Soil Physicochemical Properties in Coastal Saline Land of the Yellow River Delta[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(06):41.
[10]谢育利,陈云明,唐亚坤,等.地表凋落物对油松、沙棘人工林土壤呼吸的影响[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(06):52.
XIE Yuli,CHEN Yunming,TANG Yakun,et al.Impact of Aboveground Litterfall on Soil Respiration in the Pinus tabulaeformis and Hippophae rhamnoides Plantations[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(06):52.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2016-02-29;改回日期:2016-03-23。
基金项目:河南省教育厅科学技术研究重点项目（12B180023）；河南省科技攻关计划项目（162102310247）
作者简介:彭舜磊(1974-),男,河南驻马店人,副教授,博士,主要研究方向:森林生态学。E-mail:pengshunlei@163.com