[1]吴滢滢,吴绍华,周生路,等.昆山市土地生态质量空间分异及其对土地利用程度的响应[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(04):201-205,209.
　WU Yingying,WU Shaohua,ZHOU Shenglu,et al.Distribution of Land Ecological Environment and Its Response to Landuse Intensity in Kunshan County[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(04):201-205,209.
点击复制

昆山市土地生态质量空间分异及其对土地利用程度的响应

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 22 期数: 2015年04期 页码: 201-205,209 栏目: 出版日期: 2015-08-28
Title:
Distribution of Land Ecological Environment and Its Response to Landuse Intensity in Kunshan County
作者:
吴滢滢1, 吴绍华1, 周生路1, 林晨2, 臧玉珠1, 彭慧3
1. 南京大学 地理与海洋科学学院, 南京 210023;
2. 中国科学院 南京地理与湖泊研究所, 南京 210008;
3. 江苏省土地勘测规划院, 南京 210024
Author(s):
WU Yingying1, WU Shaohua1, ZHOU Shenglu1, LIN Chen2, ZANG Yuzhu1, PENG Hui3
1. School of Geographic and Oceanographic Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China;
2. Nanjing Institute of Geography & Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China;
3. Jiangsu Institute of Land Surveying and Planning, Nanjing 210024, China
关键词:
土地生态质量; 土地利用程度; 空间分异; 响应; 昆山市
Keywords:
land ecological quality; intensity of landuse; spatial distribute; response; Kunshan County
分类号:
X826;F301.24
摘要:
随着社会经济的快速发展，土地生态质量备受关注。选取位列中国百强县之首的昆山市为研究区，基于2012年各类数据，建立土地生态质量综合评价体系，采用皮尔逊相关系数、二元Moran指数等方法，以行政村为评价单元，对该市土地生态质量的空间格局及其对土地利用程度的响应进行了研究。结果表明：该市土地生态质量整体较好，中心城区向外围乡镇变好梯度格局明显；土地生态质量受到土地利用程度较为显著的负面影响，其中生态结构方面受到的影响最为明显，南部旅游用地地区土地利用和生态质量则协调较好；该市今后在土地开发利用的同时应注意加强生态环境的保护与建设。
Abstract:
With the continuous development of social economy, human alteration to ecosystems is becoming more and more obvious. What’s more, the growing contradiction between people and land highlights the importance of scientific management and regulation of land. Landuse is a special behavior led by human to alter and utilize the land in order to achieve particular purposes. Kunshan County is a highly developed area with a large population. In order to pursue sustainable development, the quality of its land ecological environment has become considerable challenges. In this paper, we provided the complete ecological assessment of land use in 2012. Then, we analyzed the distribution of land ecological environment in Kunshan County, and offered its distribution. Finally, we made a thorough inquiry between land ecological environment and landuse intensity. Supported by statistical analysis, we got a negative correlation trend between those two, revealing the ecological quality of the land affected by the intensity of landuse. However, as a special kind of construction land, tourism sites had a high level of landuse intensity, while the protection from the government also contributed to the high ecological status of the land. On the other hand, two scores of the concentrated water areas in the downtown both show the low level.

参考文献/References:

[1] 冯产京,林坚,胡振琪,等.2013年土地科学研究重点进展评述及2014年展望[J].中国土地科学,2014(1):3-19.
[2] 胡和兵,刘红玉,郝敬锋,等.城市化流域生态系统服务价值时空分异特征及其对土地利用程度的响应[J].生态学报,2013,33(8):2565-2576.
[3] 梁国付,丁圣彦.气候和土地利用变化对径流变化影响研究:以伊洛河流域伊河上游地区为例[J].地理科学,2012,32(5):635-640.
[4] Su S, Li D, Yu X, et al. Assessing land ecological security in Shanghai(China)based on catastrophe theory[J]. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2011,25(6):737-746.
[5] Hua Y E, Yan M A, Limin D. Land ecological security assessment for Bai autonomous prefecture of Dali based using PSR model-with data in 2009 as case[J]. Energy Procedia, 2011(5):2172-2177.
[6] 余敦,陈文波.鄱阳湖生态经济区土地生态安全研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(4):107-111.
[7] 郑敬刚,许淑娜,喻铮铮,等.中原经济区核心区土地资源生态安全评价[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(3):273-277.
[8] 余健,房莉,仓定帮,等.熵权模糊物元模型在土地生态安全评价中的应用[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(5):260-266.
[9] De Lange H J, Sala S, Vighi M, et al. Ecological vulnerability in risk assessment:A review and perspectives[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2010,408(18):3871-3879.
[10] 刘焱序,李春越,任志远.基于LUCC的生态型城市土地生态敏感性评价[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(4):125-130.
[11] Abson D J, Dougill A J, Stringer L C. Using Principal Component Analysis for information-rich socio-ecological vulnerability mapping in Southern Africa[J]. Applied Geography, 2012,35(1):515-524.
[12] 李玉平,朱琛,张义文.河北省邢台市土地生态安全评价及可持续发展对策研究[J].水土保持通报,2013,33(6):116-120.
[13] 余光英,员开奇.武汉城市圈土地碳平衡适宜性评价及潜力分析[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(6):271-276.
[14] 舒帮荣,黄琪,刘友兆,等.基于变权的城镇用地扩展生态适宜性空间模糊评价:以江苏省太仓市为例[J].自然资源学报,2012,27(3):402-412.
[15] 程琳琳,娄尚,刘峦峰,等.矿业废弃地再利用空间结构优化的技术体系与方法[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(7):207-218.
[16] 邹丽丽,陈晓翔,何莹,等.基于逻辑斯蒂回归模型的鹭科水鸟栖息地适宜性评价[J].生态学报,2012,32(12):3722-3728
[17] 庄大方,刘纪远.中国土地利用程度的区域分异模型研究[J].自然资源学报,1997,12(2):105-111.
[18] 赵兴国,潘玉君,丁生,等.中国省域土地利用可持续性评价及时空格局特征[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(3):196-204.
[19] 曲衍波.基于GIS的山区县域土地生态安全评价与土地利用优化调控研究[D].山东泰安:山东农业大学,2008.
[20] 戴靓.县域土地生态质量的空间分异及其主控因子识别[D].南京:南京大学,2013.
[21] 韩平,王纪华,潘立刚,等.北京郊区田块尺度土壤质量评价[J].农业工程学报,2009,25(2):228-234.
[22] 李晓倩,刘学录.土地评价指标权重赋值方法的比较分析[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2012,47(5):129-133.
[23] 戴靓,姚新春,周生路,等.长三角经济发达区金坛市土地生态状况评价[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(8):249-257.
[24] 张松林,张昆.空间自相关局部指标Moran指数和G系数研究[J].大地测量与地球动力学,2007,27(3):31-34.
[25] Luo H, Yang Y. Spatial pattern of hotel distribution in China[J]. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 2013,13(1):3-15.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘坚,黄贤金,赵彩艳,等.江苏省城市化发展与土地利用程度变化相关性研究[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(02):198.
　LIU Jian,HUANG Xian-jin,ZHAO Cai-yan,et al.Study on the Correlation of Intensive Land Use Change and Urbanization of Jiangsu Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(04):198.
[2]潘爱民,全斌,王昭生.长株潭城市群土地利用变化与城市化的相互响应研究[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(05):167.
　PAN Ai-min,QUAN Bin,WANG Zhao-sheng.Research on Response of Land Use and Urbanlization in Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(04):167.
[3]刘焱序,李春越,任志远,等.基于LUCC的生态型城市土地生态敏感性评价[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(04):125.
　LIU Yan-xu,LI Chun-yue,REN Zhi-yuan,et al.Land Eco-sensitivity Assessment Based on LUCC in Ecological City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(04):125.
[4]国洪磊,周启刚,焦欢,等.三峡库区土地利用变化特征研究[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(02):313.
　GUO Honglei,ZHOU Qigang,JIAO Huan,et al.Research on the Characteristics of Land Use Changes in Three Gorges Reservoir Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(04):313.
[5]于东波,许皞,赵文廷.涞源县土地利用变化及驱动力分析[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(03):93.
　YU Dongbo,XU Hao,ZHAO Wenting.Analysis of Land Use Changes and Driving Forces in Laiyuan County[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(04):93.
[6]臧玉珠,彭慧,周生路,等.苏南地区土地生态质量空间分异及其与经济发展协调性评价[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(03):188.
　ZANG Yuzhu,PENG Hui,ZHOU Shenglu,et al.Evaluation on the Spatial Differentiation of Land Ecological Quality and Its Coordination with Economic Development in South Jiangsu[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(04):188.
[7]何宝忠,高敏华,赵军安.基于马尔科夫模型的吐鲁番市土地覆被动态变化研究[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(05):41.
　HE Bao-zhong,GAO Min-hua,ZHAO Jun-an.Dynamic Changes of Land Cover Based on Markov Model in Turpan City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(04):41.
[8]崔敬涛,吴国平,范庆亚,等.基于ESDA的费县土地利用时空演变研究[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(01):240.
　CUI Jing-tao,WU Guo-ping,FAN Qing-ya,et al.Spatial and Temporal Evolution of Land Use in Fei County Based on ESDA[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(04):240.
[9]张颖,赵宇鸾.黔桂岩溶山区土地利用程度演变的空间分异特征[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(01):287.
　ZHANG Ying,ZHAO Yuluan.Spatial Difference of Land Use Degree Evolution in Guizhou-Guangxi Karst Mountainous Areas[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(04):287.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2014-09-01;改回日期:2014-09-15。
基金项目:长三角经济发达地区土地生态状况调查与评估项目（DCPJ121504-01）
作者简介:吴滢滢(1991-),女,江苏江阴人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为土地利用与生态评价。E-mail:yingyingwu1991@163.com
通讯作者:周生路(1968-),男,江西大余人,教授,博士生导师,主要从事土地资源与环境研究工作。E-mail:zhousl@nju.edu.cn

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01