[1]赵串串,杨乔媚,丁绍兰,等.湟水河流域水源涵养林水源涵养效益评估[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(04):160-164.
　ZHAO Chuan-chuan,YANG Qiao-mei,DING Shao-lan,et al.Assessment of Water Conservation Efficiency of Water Conservation Forest in Huangshui River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(04):160-164.
点击复制

湟水河流域水源涵养林水源涵养效益评估

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 16 期数: 2009年04期 页码: 160-164 栏目: 出版日期: 2009-08-20
Title:
Assessment of Water Conservation Efficiency of Water Conservation Forest in Huangshui River Basin
作者:
赵串串1, 杨乔媚1, 丁绍兰1, 董旭2, 辛文荣2
1. 陕西科技大学 资源与环境学院, 西安 710021;
2. 青海省林业调查规划院, 西宁 810007
Author(s):
ZHAO Chuan-chuan1, YANG Qiao-mei1, DING Shao-lan1, DONG Xu2, XIN Wen-rong2
1. College of Resources & Environment, Shanxi University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710021, China;
2. Qinghai Provincial Forest Inventory and Planning Institute, Xi’ning 810008, China
关键词:
湟水河; 水源涵养林; 土壤蓄水量; 枯枝落物蓄水量; 效益评估
Keywords:
Huangshui river; water conservation forest; soil water storage water; water holding of little; benefit assessment
分类号:
S727.21
摘要:
根据截留法估算湟水河流域水源涵养量，并利用影子工程法、支付意愿法对水源涵养林的涵养总量、经济效益进行了评估。结果表明：在不同的林分类型中，土壤单位面积蓄水量大小顺序为：云杉>青杨>桦树>落叶松>灌木；林下枯枝落物层单位面积蓄水量大小顺序为：青杨>云杉>落叶松>桦树>灌木，总体来看，云杉和青杨涵养水分能力较好。流域水源涵养林调节水量为0.22亿t，根据单位库容造价计算其经济价值0.60亿元，根据平均居民用水价格计算其净化水质价值0.47亿元。
Abstract:
Water conservation mass was studied by using interception method and the economic effect of water conservation forest was assessed by shadow engineering method and Contingent valuation method. The results showed that in different stand types, soil water storage capacity per unit area was sequenced as Picea asperata, Cathay Poplar, Betula, Tamarack and Bushes from high to low. Water holding of little per unit area was ranked as Cathay Poplar, Picea asperata, Tamarack, Betula and Bushes from high to low. Overall, water-storage fluctuation of Picea asperata and Cathay Poplar was better. The water conservation mass of water conservation forest in Huangshui River was 22 million tons. The economic value was 60 million Yuan by per cost of storage capacity and the water purification value was 47 million Yuan by price of per household water consumption.

参考文献/References:

[1] 王佑民.我国林冠降水再分配研究综述[J].西北林学院学报,2000,15(3):1-7.
[2] 青海省林业局.青海湟水河流域生态建设与保护发展战略研究[Z].2006.
[3] 赵串串,董旭,辛文荣,等.青海湟水河流域水土流失原因及防治措施分析[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(6):200-203.
[4] 青海省林业局.青海省森林资源二类调查报告[R].2005.
[5] 姜东涛.森林生态效益估测与评价方法的研究[J].华东森林经理,2000,4(4):14-19.
[6] 李银霞.祁连山自然保护区森林生物多样性经济价值评估[D].兰州:甘肃农业大学,2002.
[7] 常宗强,王金叶,常学向,等.祁连山水源涵养林枯枝落叶层水文生态功能[J].西北林学院学报,2001,16 (S):8-13.
[8] 刘硕.青海省大通县主要造林树种枯落物水文效应研究[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(6):105-107.
[9] 张永涛.黄前流域不同配置经济林防护林水源涵养功能与价值评估[D].泰安:山东农业大学,2005.
[10] 张静,常庆瑞.渭北黄土高原不同林型植被对土壤肥力的影响[J].水土保持通报,2006,26(3):26-28,62.
[11] 牛贇,敬文茂.祁连山北坡主要植被下土壤异质性研究[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(4):258-260,263.
[12] 青海省统计局.2006青海统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2007.
[13] 张向辉,王清春,李瀚,等.青海东峡林区森林生态系统服务功能及经济价值评估[J].北京林业大学学报,2002,24(4):85-87.

相似文献/References:

[1]和弦,宋维峰,彭永刚,等.元阳梯田全福庄流域水源涵养林的植物多样性分析[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(05):110.
　HE Xian,SONG Wei-feng,PENG Yong-gang,et al.Analysis on Plant Diversity of Water-holding Forest in Quanfu Village Basin of Yuanyang Terrace[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(04):110.
[2]陆斌,张胜利,晋建霞.秦岭北坡水源林区不同类型林分土壤水文特性[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(05):176.
　LU Bin,ZHANG Sheng-li,JIN Jian-xia.Soil Hydrological Characteristics of Different Water Conservation Forests in Mountainous Regions of North Qinling Mountain[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(04):176.
[3]王俭成,杨建英,白麟.密云水库不同林地配置下地表水水质状况分析[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(04):247.
　WANG Jian-cheng,YANG Jian-ying,BAI Lin.Analysis on Surface Water Quality in Different Woodland Configuration in Miyun Reservior[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(04):247.
[4]万云,刘桂华,徐小牛.江淮低丘林地水源涵养功能的研究[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(03):202.
　WAN Yun,LIU Gui-hua,XU Xiao-niu.Water Holding Capacity of Some Major Forest Types in Jianghuai Hilly Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(04):202.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2009-01-20。
基金项目:青海省林业局项目（横向合作项目）
作者简介:赵串串（1976-），女，硕士，讲师，主要从事流域水环境模拟与生态环境保护研究。E-mail：sxkjdxzcc@126.com

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01