Li Shuang,Zhang Qiufen,Zheng Yuexin,et al.Analysis of Runoff-Sediment Scale Transfer Effect on Slope Surface of Loess Hilly Region and Its Influencing Factors[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,31(04):1-10.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.04.005]
黄土丘陵沟壑区坡面水沙尺度传递效应及其影响因素分析
- Title:
- Analysis of Runoff-Sediment Scale Transfer Effect on Slope Surface of Loess Hilly Region and Its Influencing Factors
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2024)04-0001-10
- Keywords:
- soil and water loss; scale effect; scale transfer efficiency; runoff and sediment transport
- 分类号:
- S157.1
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- [目的]探究坡面水沙运动过程中的尺度效应,阐明黄土高原丘陵沟壑区水沙运动尺度效应影响机制,进而为水沙传递机理研究及黄河流域水沙综合治理提供科学支撑。[方法]基于黄河子洲径流试验站4个径流场径流泥沙资料,通过对比分析次降雨事件下不同坡长产流产沙过程,揭示了坡面产流产沙的尺度传递效应。提出尺度传递效率概念,用来表征上下层级间水沙传递关系,进而探究了径流泥沙传递效率的影响因素。[结果](1)不同降雨类型特征因素对坡面产流产沙的影响不同,降雨历时主要影响坡面产流产沙能力,平均雨强主要影响坡面产流产沙起始时间;(2)次降雨事件下,不同坡长的径流传递是较为理想的平衡传递机制,且随坡长增加,径流的传递能力呈减小趋势。而在40～60 m坡长条件下,泥沙的传递表现为非平衡传递过程,随坡长增加,泥沙的传递能力呈先增大后减小的变化趋势;(3)不同尺度坡面水沙传递效率的影响因素不同,径流深、平均雨强及雨后表层土壤含水率是影响水沙尺度效率传递的主要因素。[结论]黄土丘陵沟壑区坡面产流产沙能力受降雨特性及坡长的影响,水沙沿程传递存在明显的折损或增益的尺度效应,水沙传递效率受雨强、径流及土壤湿度等多重因素的调控。
- Abstract:
- [Objective]The aims of this study are to explore the scale effect in the process of runoff and sediment movement on the slope, to clarify the scale effect influence mechanism of runoff and sediment movement in the hilly and gully region of the Loess Plateau, so as to provide scientific support for the study of runoff and sediment transfer mechanism and the comprehensive management of runoff and sediment in the Yellow River Basin. [Methods]Based on the runoff and sediment data of four runoff fields in Zizhou runoff test station of the Yellow River, the scale transfer effect of runoff and sediment yield on slope was revealed by comparing and analyzing the runoff and sediment yield processes of different slope lengths under rainfall events. The concept of scale transfer efficiency was proposed to characterize the runoff and sediment transfer relationship between the upper and lower levels, and to further explore the influencing factors on runoff and sediment transfer efficiency. [Results](1)The characteristics of different rainfall types had different effects on the runoff and sediment yield on the slope. The rainfall duration mainly affected the runoff and sediment yield on the slope, and the average rainfall intensity mainly affected the starting time of runoff and sediment yield on the slope.(2)Under the event of rainfall, the runoff transfer of different slope lengths was an ideal equilibrium transfer mechanism, and with the increase of slope length, the transfer capacity of runoff showed a decreasing trend. Under the condition of 40～60 m slope length, the transfer of sediment was a non-equilibrium transfer process. With the increase of slope length, the transfer capacity of sediment increased first and then decreased.(3)The influencing factors on flow-sediment transfer efficiency on different scale slopes were different. Runoff depth, average rainfall intensity and surface soil moisture content after rain were the main factors affecting the transfer efficiency of flow-sediment scale. [Conclusion]The runoff and sediment yield capacity of the slope in the loess hilly and gully region is affected by rainfall characteristics and slope length. There is a significant scale effect of damage or gain in the transmission of runoff and sediment along the way. The efficiency of water and sediment transport is regulated by multiple factors such as rainfall intensity, runoff and soil moisture.
参考文献/References:
[1]Joel A, Messing I, Seguel O, et al. Measurement of surface water runoff from plots of two different sizes[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2002,16(7):1467-1478.
[2]Sadeghi S H R, Seghaleh M B, Rangavar A S. Plot sizes dependency of runoff and sediment yield estimates from a small watershed[J]. Catena, 2013,102:55-61.
[3]Wainwright J, Parsons A J, Abrahams A D. Plot-scale studies of vegetation, overland flow and erosion interactions:Case studies from Arizona and New Mexico[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2000,14(16/17):2921-2943.
[4]Lin H, Bouma J, Pachepsky Y, et al. Hydropedology:Synergistic integration of pedology and hydrology[J]. Water Resources Research, 2006,42(5):W05301.
[5]张林红.小流域淤地坝系溃坝洪水特征与安全评价研究[D].西安:西安理工大学,2013.
Zhang L H. Study on Characteristics of Dam Break Flood and Safety Evaluation Assessment in Small Watershed[D]. Xi'an:Xi'an University of Technology, 2013.
[6]王玲玲,姚文艺,王文龙,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区多尺度地貌单元输沙能力及水沙关系[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(24):120-126.
Wang L L, Yao W Y, Wang W L, et al. Sediment transport capacity and flow-sediment relationship in different topographical units of different spatial scales in hilly loess region[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2015,31(24):120-126.
[7]张乐涛,李占斌,王杉杉.坡面径流类型对侵蚀产沙及水沙传递关系的影响[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(20):124-131.
Zhang L T, Li Z B, Wang S S. Impact of runoff regimes on sediment yield and sediment flow behavior at slope scale[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2015,31(20):124-131.
[8]闫云霞,许炯心.黄土高原地区侵蚀产沙的尺度效应研究初探[J].中国科学:D辑 地球科学,2006,36(8):767-776.
Yan Y X, Xu J X. Preliminary study on scale effect of erosion and sediment yield in Loess Plateau[J]. Scientia Sinica(Terrae), 2006,36(8):767-776.
[9]方海燕,蔡强国,李秋艳.产沙模数与流域面积关系研究进展[J].地理科学进展,2008,27(6):63-69.
Fang H Y, Cai Q G, Li Q Y. A review of the relationship between specific sediment yield and drainage area[J]. Progress in Geography, 2008,27(6):63-69.
[10]王玲玲,姚文艺,王文龙,等.黄丘区坡沟系统不同时间尺度下的侵蚀产沙特征[J].水利学报,2013,44(11):1347-1351.
Wang L L, Yao W Y, Wang W L, et al. Characteristics of soil erosion and sediment yield of hilly-gully system at different temporal scale in the loess region[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2013,44(11):1347-1351.
[11]韩晓燕,钱鞠,王磊,等.黄土高原土壤侵蚀(水蚀)多尺度过程与水土保持研究进展[J].冰川冻土,2012,34(6):1487-1498.
Han X Y, Qian J, Wang L, et al. Progress in studying multi-scale process of soil erosion(water erosion)and soil conservation in the Loess Plateau[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2012,34(6):1487-1498.
[12]Zhou Y W, Li Z X, Wang T W, et al. Divergent hydrological responses to intensive production under different rainfall regimes:Evidence from long-term field observations[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2023,617:128918.
[13]Abbaspour K C, Rouholahnejad E, Vaghefi S, et al. A continental-scale hydrology and water quality model for Europe:Calibration and uncertainty of a high-resolution large-scale SWAT model[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2015,524:733-752.
[14]王成韬.黄土高原小流域产流及产沙过程无量纲模型研究[D].北京:中国农业大学,2006.
Wang C T. Study on the Dimensionless Models of Watershed Runoff and Sedimentation on the Loess Plateau[D]. Beijing:China Agricultural University, 2006.
[15]颜明,郑明国,舒畅,等.泾河流域径流-泥沙的尺度效应研究[J].水土保持通报,2016,36(6):184-188,194.
Yan M, Zheng M G, Shu C, et al. A study on scale effects of runoff and sediment in Jinghe River Basin[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2016,36(6):184-188,194.
[16]潘雅文,马文龙,潘庆宾,等.流域侵蚀输沙空间尺度效应及其影响因素研究进展[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(3):88-97,105.
Pan Y W, Ma W L, Pan Q B, et al. Review of the scale effects of soil erosion and sediment delivery and their influencing factors[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022,29(3):88-97,105.
[17]郑粉莉,唐克丽,周佩华.坡耕地细沟侵蚀影响因素的研究[J].土壤学报,1989,26(2):109-116.
Zheng F L, Tang K L, Zhou P H. Study on factors affecting rill erosion on cultivated slope land[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 1989,26(2):109-116.
[18]de Vente J, Poesen J. Predicting soil erosion and sediment yield at the basin scale:Scale issues and semi-quantitative models[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2005,71(1/2):95-125.
[19]张乐涛.基于侵蚀能量的径流输沙尺度效应研究:以黄土高原丘陵沟壑区为例[D].北京:中国科学院大学,2016.
Zhang L T. Spatial Scale Effects on Erosive Energy Based Water Flow Driven Sediment Delivery on the Hilly Loess Region of the Chinese Loess Plateau[D]. Beijing:University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2016.
[20]Gomi T, Sidle R C, Miyata S, et al. Dynamic runoff connectivity of overland flow on steep forested hillslopes:Scale effects and runoff transfer[J]. Water Resources Research, 2008,44(8):W08411.
[21]张晓明,曹文洪,武思宏,等.泥沙输移比尺度依存及分形特征[J].水利学报,2013,44(10):1225-1232.
Zhang X M, Cao W H, Wu S H, et al. Dependence of sediment delivery ratio on scale and its fractal characteristics[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2013,44(10):1225-1232.
[22]Liu J B, Liang Y, Gao G Y, et al. Quantifying the effects of rainfall intensity fluctuation on runoff and soil loss:From indicators to models[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2022,607:127494.
[23]刘青泉,李家春,陈力,等.坡面流及土壤侵蚀动力学(Ⅱ):土壤侵蚀[J].力学进展,2004,34(4):493-506.
Liu Q Q, Li J C, Chen L, et al. Dynamics of overland flow and soil erosion(Ⅱ):Soil erosion[J]. Advances in Mechanics, 2004,34(4):493-506.
相似文献/References:
[1]刘旦旦,刘 亚,夏小林,等.安徽省重点水土流失区土壤可蚀性K值评估与修正[J].水土保持研究,2024,31(05):148.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.05.044]
Liu Dandan,Liu Ya,Xia Xiaolin,et al.Evaluation and Correction of Soil Erodibility K Value in the Key Soil Loss Areas of Anhui Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,31(04):148.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.05.044]
[2]张江辉,邱胜彬,白云岗,等.新疆水土保持现状及发展探讨[J].水土保持研究,2002,9(04):22.
ZHANG Jiang-hui,QIU Sheng-bin,BAI Yun-gang,et al.Discussion on the Present Situation of Soil and Water Conservation and Its Development in Xinjiang[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2002,9(04):22.
[3]刘清慧,孟凡光,朱丽坤.浅析荣军农场水土流失治理措施[J].水土保持研究,2002,9(04):26.
LIU Qing-hui,MENG Fan-guang,ZHU Li-kun.Preliminary Analysis on Controlling Measures for Soil and Water Loss on Rongjun Farm[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2002,9(04):26.
[4]汪妮,解建仓,马斌.水土流失对水资源利用的影响[J].水土保持研究,2002,9(04):33.
WANG Ni,XIE Jian-cang,MA Bin.Effect of Soil and Water Loss on Water Resources Utilization[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2002,9(04):33.
[5]邹亚荣,赵晓丽,张增祥,等.我国低山丘陵区水土流失及生态环境背景分析[J].水土保持研究,2002,9(04):49.
ZOU Ya-rong,ZHAO Xiao-li,ZHANG Zeng-xiang,et al.Analysis of Soil Erosion Environment Background in China Hills[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2002,9(04):49.
[6]唐慧中,闫书军,杨伟,等.郭罗沟流域综合治理效益分析[J].水土保持研究,2002,9(04):87.
TANG Hui-zhong,YAN Shu-jun,YANG Wei,et al.Benefit Analysis of Comprehensive Control of Guoluogou Watershed[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2002,9(04):87.
[7]张清春,刘宝元,翟刚.植被与水土流失研究综述[J].水土保持研究,2002,9(04):96.
ZHANG Qing-chun,LIU Bao-yuan,ZHAI Gang.Review on Relationship Between Vegetation and Soil and Water Loss[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2002,9(04):96.
[8]刘九玉,可素娟,徐建华.水土保持生态环境监测站网合理布局研究[J].水土保持研究,2002,9(04):113.
LIU Jiu-yu,KE Su-juan,XU Jian-hua.Study on Reasonable Layout of the Ecological Environment Monitoring Station Net[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2002,9(04):113.
[9]唐治诚,钟冰.云阳县旱地土壤退化及防治[J].水土保持研究,2002,9(04):133.
TANG Zhi-cheng,ZHONG Bing.Degradation of Upland Fields in Yunyang County and Its Control[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2002,9(04):133.
[10]文军,李海明,李添萍.青海省水土流失与荒漠化的发展趋势及防治对策[J].水土保持研究,2002,9(04):147.
WEN Jun,LI Hai-ming,LI Tian-ping.Countermeasures and Tendency of Soil and Water Loss and Desertification in Qinghai Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2002,9(04):147.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2023-05-04 修回日期:2023-09-04
资助项目:国家重点研发计划课题(2022YFC3204403); 国家自然科学基金黄河水科学研究联合基金(U2243234,U2243601); 河南省自然科学基金青年基金(222300420236)
第一作者:李爽(1999—),女,河南濮阳人,硕士研究生,研究方向为水文水资源。E-mail:shuang@mail.bnu.edu.cn
通信作者:鱼京善(1965—),男,吉林延边人,博士,教授,主要从事水文水资源研究。E-mail:jingshan@bnu.edu.cn