Gao Wei,Ye Gongfu,Yue Xinjian,et al.Soil Microbial Communities in Different Protection Forest Types in Coastal Sand Dunes of Fujian Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,31(03):204-212.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.03.029]
福建海岸沙地5种防护林土壤微生物群落特征
- Title:
- Soil Microbial Communities in Different Protection Forest Types in Coastal Sand Dunes of Fujian Province
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2024)03-0204-09
- Keywords:
- coastal sand dune; protection forest; soil microbial community; phospholipids fatty acid; subtropical China
- 分类号:
- S154.3; S714.3
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- [目的]探明福建海岸沙地不同防护林对土壤微生物群落的影响及机制,为海岸带防护林森林质量提升提供科学依据。[方法]选择5种主要防护林为对象,分别为次生林、木麻黄(Casuarina equisetifolia)人工林、湿地松(Pinus elliottii)人工林、厚荚相思(Acacia crassicarpa)人工林和尾巨桉(Eucalyptus urophylla×E.grandis)人工林,采用磷脂脂肪酸法(Phospholipids fatty acid,PLFA)比较了不同防护林的土壤微生物群落结构。[结果](1)海岸沙地不同防护林土壤中共检测到18种PLFA生物标记,在尾巨桉和次生林中种类最多,湿地松和厚荚相思人工林最少。(2)土壤总磷脂脂肪酸、革兰氏阳性细菌和革兰氏阴性细菌含量均表现为尾巨桉和次生林较高,厚荚相思和木麻黄人工林较低,土壤真菌含量为尾巨桉林最高,丛枝菌根菌含量为次生林最高,真菌和丛枝菌根菌含量在其他防护林间无显著差异。(3)次生林的土壤微生物多样性和均匀度均高于4种人工林。(4)土壤pH、细根碳氮含量为土壤微生物群落的主要影响因子,其次为土壤全氮和硝态氮含量以及凋落物木质素/氮和细根碳氮比。[结论]不同防护林对土壤微生物群落的影响存在显著差异,在海岸带木麻黄防护林中引种尾巨桉和乡土树种,可以增加土壤微生物多样性,提高森林生态功能。
- Abstract:
- [Objective] The aims of this study are to understand the soil microbial communities in different protection forests in coastal sand dune ecosystem, and to provide theoretical basis for sustainable management of the protection forests. [Methods] A study was conducted to compare the effects of different forests on soil microbial composition and the relationship between soil microorganism and environmental factors by phospholipid fatty acid method(PLFA)in 5 forests including secondary forest, and plantations of Casuarina equisetifolia, Pinus elliottii, Acacia crassicarpa and Eucalyptus urophylla×E. grandis. [Results](1)18 kinds of PLFA biomarkers were detected in the soils of different protection forests in coastal sand dune ecosystem, which were most in Eucalyptus urophylla×E. grandis plantation and secondary forest, and least in Pinus elliottii and Acacia crassicarpa plantations.(2)The contents of total PLFA, gram-positive bacteria and gram-negative bacteria were all higher in Eucalyptus urophylla×E. grandis plantation and secondary forest, and lower in Acacia crassicarpa and Casuarina equisetifolia plantations. In addition, the fungi content was significantly higher in Eucalyptus urophylla×E. grandis plantation than in other forest types, the content of soil fungi in Eucalyptus urophylla×E. grandis plantation was the highest, and that of arbuscular mycorrhizal in secondary forest was the highest, no significant difference was found among other protection forests.(3)The soil microbial diversity and evenness of the secondary forest were higher than those of the four plantations.(4)The soil pH, fine root carbon and nitrogen contents had the greatest impact on soil microbial community, followed by soil total nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen contents, litter lignin/nitrogen and fine root carbon nitrogen ratio. [Conclusion] The effects of protection forests on soil microbial community are significantly different. The introduction of Eucalyptus urophylla×E. grandis and native trees in the coastal Casuarina equisetifolia protection forest can increase soil microbial diversity and improve forest ecological functions.
参考文献/References:
[1] Torsvik V L, Goksyr J, Daae F L. High diversity in DNA of soil bacteria[J]. Applied & Environmental Microbiology, 1990,56(3):782-787.
[2] 罗达,刘顺,史作民,等.川西亚高山不同林龄云杉人工林土壤微生物群落结构[J].应用生态学报,2017,28(2):519-527.
Luo D, Liu S, Shi Z M, et al. Soil microbial community structure in Picea asperata plantations with different ages in subalpine of western Sichuan, Southwest China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017,28(2):519-527.
[3] Wang M, Qu L Y, Ma K M, et al. Soil microbial properties under different vegetation types on Mountain Han[J]. Science China Life Sciences, 2013,56(6):561-570.
[4] Cai Y F, Barber P, Dell B, et al. Soil bacterial functional diversity is associated with the decline of Eucalyptus gomphocephala[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2010,260(6):1047-1057.
[5] Hu L, Xiang Z Y, Wang G X, et al. Changes in soil physicochemical and microbial properties along elevation gradients in two forest soils[J]. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 2016,31(3):1-27.
[6] Mcguire K L, Fierer N, Bateman C, et al. Fungal community composition in neotropical rain forests:the influence of tree diversity and precipitation[J]. Microbial Ecology, 2012,63(4):804-812.
[7] Aneja M K, Sharma S, Fleischmann F, et al. Microbial colonization of beech and spruce litter: Influence of decomposition site and plant litter species on the diversity of microbial community[J]. Microbial Ecology, 2006,52(1):127-135.
[8] 施秀珍,王建青,黄志群,等.树种多样性对土壤微生物群落结构和元素生物地球化学循环的影响研究进展[J].生态学报,2022,42(15):6092-6102.
Shi X Z, Wang J Q, Huang Z Q, et al. Research progresses in the effects of tree species diversity on soil microbial communities and biogeochemical cycling of elements[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022,42(15):6092-6102.
[9] MeriläP, Strömmer R, Fritze H. Soil microbial activity and community structure along a primary succession transect on the land-uplift coast in western finland[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2002,34(11):1647-1654.
[10] Xiao S S, Ye G F, Zhang L H, et al. Soil heterotrophic respiration in Casuarina equisetifolia plantation at different stand ages[J]. Journal of Forestry Research, 2009,20(4):301-306.
[11] Gao W, Huang Z Q, Ye G F, et al. Effects of forest cover types and environmental factors on soil respiration dynamics in a coastal sand dune of subtropical China[J]. Journal of Forestry Research, 2018,29(6):1645-1655.
[12] Gao W, Lin M M, Huang Y R, et al. Effects of forest types and environmental factors on soil microbial biomass in a coastal sand dune of subtropical China[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2020,11(5):454-465.
[13] Bezemer T M, Lawson C, Hedlund K, et al. Plant species and functional group effects on abiotic and microbial soil properties and plant-soil feedback responses in two grasslands[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2006,94(5):893-904.
[14] Ushio M, Wagai R, Balser T, et al. Variations in the soil microbial community composition of a tropical montane forest ecosystem:Does tree species matter?[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2008,40(10):2699-2702.
[15] Chang E H, Chen C T, Chen T H, et al. Soil microbial communities and activities in sand dunes of subtropical coastal forests[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2011,49(5):256-262.
[16] White D, Davis W, Nickels J, et al. Determination of the sedimentary microbial biomass by extractible lipid phosphate[J]. Oecologia, 1979,40(1):51-62.
[17] 孙海新,刘训理.茶树根际微生物研究[J].生态学报,2004,24(7):1353-1357.
Sun H X, Liu X L. Microbes studies of tea rhizosphere[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2004,24(7):1353-1357.
[18] 字洪标,向泽宇,王根绪,等.青海不同林分土壤微生物群落结构(PLFA)[J].林业科学,2017,53(3):21-32.
Zi H B, Xiang Z Y, Wang G X, et al. Profile of soil microbial community under different stand types in Qinghai Province(PLFA)[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2017,53(3):21-32.
[19] Högberg M, Högberg P, Myrold D. Is microbial community composition in boreal forest soils determined by pH, C-to-N ratio, the trees, or all three[J]. Oecologia, 2007,150(4):590-601.
[20] Grayston S, Campbell C, Bardgett R D, et al. Assessing shifts in microbial community structure across a range of grasslands of differing management intensity using CLPP, PLFA and community DNA techniques[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2004,25(1):63-84.
[21] 丁国昌,万晓华,杨起帆,等.亚热带树种转换对林地土壤微生物群落结构和功能的影响[J].应用生态学报,2017,28(11):3751-3758.
Ding G C, Wan X H, Yang Q F, et al. Effects of tree species transition on soil microbial community composition and functions in subtropical China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017,28(11):3751-3758.
[22] Kramer C, Gleixner G. Variable use of plant-and soil-derived caron by microorganisms in agricultural soils[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2006,38(11):3267-3278.
[23] Rahman M M, Tsukamoto J, Rahman M, et al. Lignin and its effects on litter decomposition in forest ecosystems[J]. Chemistry and Ecology, 2013,29(6):540-553.
[24] Zhang L H, Zhang S J, Ye G F, et al. Changes of tannin and nutrients during decomposition of branchlets of Casuarina equisetifolia plantation in subtropical coastal areas of China[J]. Plant, Soil and Environment, 2018,59(2):74-79.
[25] Ye G F, Zhang S J, Zhang L H, et al. Age-related changes in nutrient resorption patterns and tannin concentration of Casuarina equisetifolia plantations[J]. Journal of Tropical Forest Science, 2012,24(4):546-556.
[26] Frey S, Thiet R K, Batten K M. Bacterial and fungal contributions to carbon sequestration in agroecosystems[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2006,70(2):555-569.
[27] Nilsson L O, Giesler R, Bååth E, et al. Growth and biomass of mycorrhizal mycelia in coniferous forests along short natural nutrient gradient[J]. New Phytologist, 2005,165(2):613-622.
[28] Tan H, Barret M, Mooij M, et al. Long-term phosphorus fertilisation increased the diversity of the total bacterial community and the phoD phosphorus mineraliser group in pasture soils[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2013,49(6):661-672.
[29] Kelly J, Favila E, Hundal L, et al. Assessment of soil microbial communities in surface applied mixtures of Illinois River sediments and biosolids[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2007,36(2/3):176-183.
[30] Hammesfahr U, Heuer H, Manzke B, et al. Impact of the antibiotic sulfadiazine and pig manure on the microbial community structure in agricultural soils[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2008,40(7):1583-1591.
[31] Moore-kucera J, Dick R. PLFA profiling of microbial community structure and seasonal shifts in soils of a Douglas-fir chronosequence[J]. Microbial Ecology, 2008,55(3):500-511.
[32] Sampedro I, Giubilei M, Cajthaml T, et al. Short-term impact of dry olive mill residue addition to soil on the resident microbiota[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2009,100(23):6098-6106.
[33] Iovieno P, Alfani A, Bååth E. Soil microbial community structure and biomass as affected by Pinus pinea plantation in two Mediterranean areas[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2010,45(1):56-63.
[34] Gessner M, Swan C, Dang C, et al. Diversity meets decomposition[J]. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2010,25(6):372-380.
[35] Bååth E, Anderson T H. Comparison of soil fungal/bacterial ratios in a pH gradient using physiological and PLFA-based techniques[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2003,35(7):955-963.
[36] Bardgett R D, Frankland J, Whittaker J B. The effects of agricultural practices on the soil biota of some upland grasslands[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 1993,45(1):25-45.
[37] Rousk J, Brookes P, Bååth E. The microbial PLFA composition as affected by pH in an arable soil[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2010,42(3):516-520.
[38] Liu L, Gundersen P, Zhang T, et al. Effects of phosphorus addition on soil microbial biomass and community composition in three forest types in tropical China[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2012,44(1):31-38.
[39] Griffiths B, Ritz K, Ebblewhite N, et al. Soil microbial community structure:Effects of substrate loading rates[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1998,31(1):145-153.
[40] Craine J, Morrow C, Fierer N. Microbial nitrogen limitation increase decomposition[J]. Ecology, 2007,88(8):2105-2113.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2022-10-30 修回日期:2023-07-22
资助项目:福建省林业科学研究项目(2023FKJ31); 福建省科技计划项目(2021L3017)
第一作者:高伟(1985—),男,山东青岛人,博士,高级工程师,研究方向:沿海防护林生态构建及海岸带生态系统恢复。E-mail:gao01271@163.com
通信作者:黄志群(1973—),男,福建龙岩人,博士,教授,研究方向:亚热带人工林经营及森林生态系统碳、氮循环。E-mail:zhiqunhuang@hotmail.com