Bai Yonghui,Zha Xuan,Wu Weicheng,et al.Characteristics of Soil Particle Composition and Soil Nutrient Storage in Vegetated Granite Red Soil[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,31(03):179-186.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.03.046]
植被恢复花岗岩红壤土壤颗粒组成及土壤养分储量特征
- Title:
- Characteristics of Soil Particle Composition and Soil Nutrient Storage in Vegetated Granite Red Soil
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2024)03-0179-08
- Keywords:
- vegetation restoration model; soil particle composition; soil nutrient storage; granite red soil; erosion-degraded land
- 分类号:
- S152.7
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- [目的]探明植被恢复下花岗岩红壤土壤颗粒组成和土壤养分的关系以及土壤养分储量特征,为植被恢复花岗岩红壤侵蚀退化地提供理论依据和实践指导。[方法]选择5种植被恢复模式〔乔灌草模式(ASG)、条沟草灌(GGH)、全坡面播草(FSG)、低效林改造(IFT)、封禁(CC))以及严重侵蚀退化地(HDL)和自然林(NV)〕为对照作为研究对象,通过野外调查和室内试验方法,明晰植被恢复模式下土壤颗粒组成和土壤养分的关系,土壤养分储量特征和识别植被恢复退化红壤养分恢复状况的指标。[结果]5种植被恢复模式改善了0—5 cm花岗岩退化地土壤颗粒组成,0—5 cm土壤颗粒组成和土壤养分指标的冗余分析表明,土壤黏粒和土壤养分呈显著正相关。5种植被恢复模式增加了0—5 cm花岗岩红壤退化地的土壤有机碳、全氮、全钾、速效钾、全磷、速效磷的养分含量和储量,0—5 cm土壤有机碳含量、0—60 cm土壤有机碳储量和0—60 cm土壤养分总储量顺序一致,均表现为乔灌草模式>条沟草灌>全坡面播草>低效林改造>封禁。[结论]土壤黏粒是提高0—5 cm土壤养分含量的关键因子,土壤有机质是识别植被恢复模式土壤养分状况的直观指标,乔灌草模式是改善土壤颗粒组成、提高土壤养分含量和土壤养分储量的最佳模式。
- Abstract:
- [Objective] The aims of this study are to investigate the relationship between soil particle composition and soil nutrients and the storage characteristics of soil nutrients under vegetation restoration of granite red soil, and to provide theoretical basis and practical guidance for vegetation restoration of granite red soil erosion and degradation. [Methods] Five vegetation restoration modes(ASG, CC, FSG, GGH, IFT), highly degraded land(HDL)and natural vegetation(NV)were selected as survey plots. The relationship between soil particle composition and soil nutrients and the characteristics of soil nutrient storage under vegetation restoration model were clarified, and the indicators of nutrient recovery in degraded red soil after vegetation restoration were identified by using field investigation and laboratory test method. [Results] Soil particle composition of 0—5 cm layer in granite degraded soil was improved by planting restoration model. The redundancy analysis showed that there was a significant positive correlation between soil clay and soil nutrients. The nutrient contents and reserves of soil organic carbon, total nitrogen, total potassium, available potassium, total phosphorus and available phosphorus in the red soil degraded land of 0—5 cm were increased by planting restoration mode. The organic carbon content of soil 0—5 cm and the organic carbon storage of soil 0—60 cm were in the same order as the total nutrient storage of soil 0—60 cm, the order was ASG>GGH> FSG>IFT>CC. [Conclusion] Soil clay is the key factor to increase soil nutrient content in 0—5 cm soil layer. Soil organic matter is an intuitive index to identify soil nutrient status in vegetation restoration mode. ASG is the best model to improve soil particle composition, increase soil nutrient contents, and soil nutrient storage.
参考文献/References:
[1] 王贤,张洪江,程金花,等.重庆四面山几种林地土壤颗粒分形特征及其影响因素[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(3):154-159.
Wang X, Zhang H J, Cheng J H, et al. Fractal characteristics and related affecting factors of particle size distribution of different forest soil in Simian Mountains, Chongqing[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2011,25(3):154-159.
[2] 王丽梅,张谦,白利华,等.毛乌素沙地3种人工植被类型对土壤颗粒组成和固碳的影响[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(1):88-94.
Wang L M, Zhang Q, Bai L H, et al. Effects of three artificial vegetation types on soil particle composition and carbon fixation in the mu us sandy land[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020,27(1):88-94.
[3] 雷泽勇,于东伟,周凤艳,等.樟子松人工林营建对土壤颗粒组成变化的影响[J].生态学报,2020,40(15):5367-5376.
Lei Z Y, Yu D W, Zhou F Y, et al. Effects of afforestation with Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica on change of soil particle size distribution in sandy land[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020,40(15):5367-5376.
[4] 欧阳帅,项文化,陈亮,等.南方山地丘陵区森林植被恢复对水土流失调控机制[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(5):1-9.
Ouyang S, Xiang W H, Chen L, et al. Regulation mechanisms of forest vegetation restoration on water and soil erosion in mountainous and hilly area of southern China[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021,35(5):1-9.
[5] Paula R R, Calmon M, Lopes-Assad M L, et al. Soil organic carbon storage in forest restoration models and environmental conditions[J]. Journal of Forestry Research, 2022,33(4):1123-1134.
[6] 朱丽琴,黄荣珍,段洪浪,等.红壤侵蚀地不同人工恢复林对土壤总有机碳和活性有机碳的影响[J].生态学报,2017,37(1):249-257.
Zhu L Q, Huang R Z, Duan H L, et al. Effects of artificially restored forests on soil organic carbon and active organic carbon in eroded red soil[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017,37(1):249-257.
[7] 姜永孟,邓翠,吕茂奎,等.红壤侵蚀区马尾松林恢复过程中土壤异养呼吸及微生物多样性的变化特征[J].土壤学报,2023,60(4):1156-1168.
Jiang Y M, Deng C, Lyu M K, et al. Changes in soil heterotrophic respiration and its microbial diversity during restoration of Pinus massoniana plantations in eroded red soil area[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2023,60(4):1156-1168.
[8] 夏江宝,顾祝军,周峰,等.红壤丘陵区不同植被类型土壤颗粒分形与水分物理特征[J].中国水土保持科学,2012,10(5):9-15.
Xia J B, Gu Z J, Zhou F, et al. Soil particle fractal dimension and soil moisture physical properties in different forest stands in hilly red soil region[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2012,10(5):9-15.
[9] 张跃进,李沁谊,王好才,等.中国西南喀斯特地区植被自然恢复演替典型群落土壤碳氮储量特征[J].林业科学,2023,59(7):45-53.
Zhang Y J, Li Q Y, Wang H C, et al. Characteristics of soil carbon and nitrogen storage in typical communities of natural restoration and succession of vegetation in Karst areas of southwest China[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2023,59(7):45-53.
[10] 张宏,刘建军.黄土沟壑区不同土地利用方式下土壤养分及其与土壤颗粒组成关系[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2016,36(11):80-85.
Zhang H, Liu J J. Distribution of soil nutrient under different land use and relationship between soil nutrient.and soil granule composition in Loess hilly region[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology,2016,36(11):80-85.
[11] Jin Z, Dong Y S, Qi Y C, et al. Characterizing variations in soil particle-size distribution along a grass–desert shrub transition in the Ordos Plateau of inner Mongolia, China[J]. Land Degradation & Development, 2013,24(2):141-146.
[12] Yan Y C, Xin X P, Xu X L, et al. Quantitative effects of wind erosion on the soil texture and soil nutrients under different vegetation coverage in a semiarid steppe of Northern China[J]. Plant and Soil, 2013,369(1):585-598.
[13] Hao H X, Qin J H, Sun Z X, et al. Erosion-reducing effects of plant roots during concentrated flow under contrasting textured soils[J]. CATENA, 2021,203:105378.
[14] 李强,杨俊诚,张加琼,等.植物根系抗侵蚀指标及模型研究进展[J].农业资源与环境学报,2020,37(1):17-23.
Li Q, Yang J C, Zhang J Q, et al. Progress of research on soil erosion resistance of plant roots and future prospects[J]. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment, 2020,37(1):17-23.
[15] Ding W F, Li M. Effects of grass coverage and distribution patterns on erosion and overland flow hydraulic characteristics[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2016,75(6):477.
[16] Li J W, Luo B L, Wei X H, et al. Transportation of fine particles controlled by particles flocculation is a key feature of soil erosion on gentle slope land[J]. Catena, 2023,232:107382.
[17] 沈子雅,程金花,管凝,等.模拟降雨条件下灌草配置对坡面侵蚀泥沙颗粒分布的影响[J].农业工程学报,2022,38(11):125-133.
Shen Z Y, Cheng J H, Guan N, et al. Effects of shrub-herb arrangements on the distribution of sediment particles eroded from slopes under simulated rainfall conditions[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2022,38(11):125-133.
[18] Bai Y H, Zha X, Chen S F. Effects of the vegetation restoration years on soil microbial community composition and biomass in degraded lands in Changting County, China[J]. Journal of Forestry Research, 2020,31(4):1295-1308.
[19] 张鑫,李博,祖艳群,等.滇池流域4种典型次生林径流养分输出特征及机理[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(5):37-42.
Zhang X, Li B, Zu Y Q, et al. Characteristics and mechanism of nutrient output from surface runoff of secondary forest in Dianchi Lake watershed, Yunnan Province of southwest China[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2014,28(5):37-42.
[20] 常珺枫,刘莹,李陈,等.农田氮磷流失特征及影响因素研究[J].中国农学通报,2023,39(15):69-75.
Chang J F, Liu Y, Li C, et al. Characteristics of nitrogen and phosphorus loss in farmland and the influencing factors[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023,39(15):69-75.
[21] 张广杰,巢林,张伟东,等.亚热带森林土壤理化性质的异质性和最佳取样量[J].应用生态学报,2018,29(7):2139-2148.
Zhang G J, Chao L, Zhang W D, et al. Heterogeneity and optimal sampe size of soil physicochemical properties in subtropical forest[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018,29(7):2139-2148.
[22] Herman J, Moorhead D, Berg B. The relationship between rates of lignin and cellulose decay in aboveground forest litter[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2008,40(10):2620-2626.
相似文献/References:
[1]李品荣,孟广涛,方向京,等.滇中不同植被恢复模式下土壤肥力变化趋势研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):90.
LI Pin-rong,MENG Guang-tao,FANG Xiang-jing,et al.Study on Change Trends of Soil Fertility under Different Vegetation Recovery Modes in Central Yunnan Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(03):90.
[2]赵名彦,丁国栋,罗俊宝,等.沙地公路取土场植被恢复模式与效果分析[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(01):191.
ZHAO Ming-yan,DING Guo-dong,LUO Jun-bao,et al.A Mode of Vegetation Restoration and Its Benefits Analysis in Sand Cutting Sites of Highway[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(03):191.
[3]郭文,王天伟,高照良.黄土区高速公路植被恢复模式与群落结构分析[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(04):176.
GUO Wen,WANG Tian-wei,GAO Zhao-liang.Vegetative Restoration Pattern and Analysis of Community Structure along the Sides of Expressway on the Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(03):176.
[4]熊诗源,许文年,夏栋,等.不同植被恢复模式对植被混凝土基材微生物特征的影响研究[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(04):279.
XIONG Shi-yuan,XU Wen-nian,XIA Dong,et al.Effects of Soil Microbial Features on Vegetation-growing Concrete Gunning in Different Vegetative Restoration Patterns[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(03):279.
[5]刘艳,刘学全,崔鸿侠,等.低丘黄壤区不同植被恢复模式水土保持功能分析[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(06):48.
LIU Yan,LIU Xue-quan,CUI Hong-xia,et al.Analysis on Function of Water and Soil Conservation of Different Vegetation Restoration Patterns in Yellow Soil Area of Low Hill[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(03):48.
[6]苗保河,郑延海,伏芳,等.北京市门头沟区石灰窑遗址及公路边坡裸露地表植被修复模式的生态评价[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(06):125.
MIAO Bao-he,ZHENG Yan-hai,FU Fang,et al.Ecological Evaluation on Vegetation Restoration in Bare Lands of Limekiln Site and Road Slope in Mentougou District of Beijing[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(03):125.
[7]赵洋毅,段旭.滇东石漠化地区不同植被模式土壤渗透性研究[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(04):45.
ZHAO Yang-yi,DU Xu.Study on Soil Infiltration Capability under Different Vegetation Models in Rocky-Desertification Areas of Karst in Eastern Part of Yunnan Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(03):45.
[8]王丽梅,张 谦,白利华,等.毛乌素沙地3种人工植被类型对土壤颗粒组成和固碳的影响[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(01):88.
WANG Limei,ZHANG Qian,BAI Lihua,et al.Effects of Three Artificial Vegetation Types on Soil Particle Composition and Carbon Fixation in the Mu Us Sandy Land[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(03):88.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2023-07-15 修回日期:2023-09-17
资助项目:江西省数字国土重点实验室开放基金“赣南典型水土流失区遥感监测与精准修复”(DLLJ202003); 国家自然科学基金项目“南方丘陵红壤侵蚀退化地植被恢复对土壤分离过程的调控机理”(42377326); 东华理工大学博士科研启动基金“红壤区不同植被恢复时期土壤团聚体稳定机理研究”(DHBK2019004)
第一作者:白永会(1981—),女,内蒙古赤峰人,博士,讲师,主要从事植被恢复侵蚀退化地方面的研究。E-mail:201960070@ecut.edu.cn
通信作者:查轩(1961—),男,陕西咸阳人,博士生导师,教授,主要从事植被恢复侵蚀退化地方面的研究。E-mail:xzha@fjnu.edu.cn