Meng Wenyang,Rao Liangyi.Spatial Variability of Soil Erodibility Factor K of the Typical Small Watershed in the Soil Covered Area of Pisha Sandstone Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,31(03):10-19.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.03.017]
砒砂岩覆土区典型小流域土壤可蚀性K值空间变异特征
- Title:
- Spatial Variability of Soil Erodibility Factor K of the Typical Small Watershed in the Soil Covered Area of Pisha Sandstone Region
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2024)03-0010-10
- Keywords:
- K value of soil erodibility; EPIC model; spatial variability; soil cover area of Pisha sandstone region; small watershed
- 分类号:
- S157.1
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- [目的]研究砒砂岩覆土区典型小流域土壤可蚀性的空间变异特征,为砒砂岩覆土区土壤侵蚀机理深入探究和土壤侵蚀有效防治提供科学依据。[方法]以内蒙古准格尔旗砒砂岩覆土区二老虎沟小流域为研究对象,采集0—10 cm和10—20 cm土层共144份土壤样品,基于EPIC模型估算土壤可蚀性K值,并利用GIS和地统计学方法分析土壤可蚀性K值空间变异特征。[结果](1)二老虎沟小流域土壤砂粒、粉粒、黏粒和有机碳均呈中等变异程度,除黏粒和有机碳为中等空间自相关性外,其他土壤属性均呈弱空间自相关性。(2)小流域土壤可蚀性K值介于0.018 7～0.047 6 t·hm2·h/(hm 2·MJ·mm),0—10 cm和10—20 cm土层K值变异系数分别为15.5%和20.3%,属中等变异强度; 0—10 cm土层K值主要受随机性因素影响,呈弱空间自相关性,而10—20 cm土层受随机性因素和结构性因素共同影响,为中等空间自相关性。(3)3种克里格插值方法结果表明:小流域土壤可蚀性K值空间变异受海拔和坡度影响明显,其总体分布趋势为西部和东南部较高、中部及偏东部较低; 普通克里格插值方法较适宜应用于砒砂岩覆土区小流域,其估算结果可较好地显示土壤可蚀性的整体和局部两方面的空间变异特征。(4)在垂直空间变异上,0—10 cm和10—20 cm土层土壤可蚀性K值总体分布规律相似,但10—20 cm土层土壤可蚀性K值较0—10 cm土层空间变异更为明显。[结论]海拔和坡度对砒砂岩覆土区典型小流域土壤可蚀性K值空间变异影响明显,未来应优先对坡面和坡顶区域进行土壤侵蚀防治。
- Abstract:
- [Objective] The spatial variability of soil erodibility of the typical small watershed in the soil covered area of Pisha sandstone region were explored, and to provide scientific basis for further exploring the mechanism of soil erosion and effectively preventing soil erosion in the soil covered area of Pisha sandstone region. [Methods] Erlaohugou small watershed in the soil covered area of Pisha sandstone region was taking as the study area. 144 soil soil samples from 0—10 cm and 10—20 cm soil layers were collected. The EPIC model was used to calculate the soil erodibility K value, and the methods of GIS and geostatistics was used to analyze the spatial variability of soil erodibility K value. [Results](1)The variation coefficients of sand, silt, clay and soil organic carbon were moderate variability in small watershed. Except for the clay and soil organic carbon possessed by moderate spatial correlation, other soil properties had weak spatial correlation.(2)The range of soil erodibility K value was 0.018 7～0.047 6 t·hm2·h/(hm2·MJ·mm), and the variation coefficients of K value in 0—10 cm and 10—20 cm soil layers were 15.5% and 20.3%, respectively, which belonged to moderate variability. The K value in 0—10 cm soil layer affected by random factor was weak spatial correlation, yet the K value in 10—20 cm soil layer was moderate spatial correlation and influenced by random and structural factors.(3)The result of three Kriging methods showed the spatial variability of soil erodibility K value was significantly affected by elevation and slope, and spatial distribution exhibited a trend that the high K value was located in the west and southeast, and the low stand in central and east-central area. Compared with other Kriging methods, the Ordinary Kriging was more suitable for the Pisha sandstone region as a result of the better reflection of spatial variability from whole and partial.(4)In vertical spatial distribution, the soil erodibility K value belonging to different soil layers had similar distribution trend, but the spatial variability of K value in 10—20 cm soil layer was more obvious than that in 0—10 cm soil layer. [Conclusion] The elevation and slope affect the spatial variability of soil erodibility K value significantly, and the priority area for prevention and control is slope surface and top of slope in the future.
参考文献/References:
[1] 梁音,史学正.长江以南东部丘陵山区土壤可蚀性K值研究[J].水土保持研究,1999,6(2):48-52.
Liang Y, Shi X Z. Soil erodiable K in east hillyfields of the southern yangtze river[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 1999,6(2):48-52.
[2] 曹祥会,龙怀玉,雷秋良,等.河北省表层土壤可侵蚀性K值评估与分析[J].土壤,2015,47(6):1192-1198.
Cao X H, Long H Y, Le Q L, et al. Assessment and analysis of the topsoil erodibility K values in Hebei Province[J]. Soils, 2015,47(6):1192-1198.
[3] 李子君,王硕,林锦阔,等.沂河流域土壤可蚀性空间变异研究[J].土壤通报,2019,50(1):45-51.
Li Z J, Wang S, Lin J K, et al. Spatial variability of soil erodibility in the Yihe River Basin[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2019,50(1):45-51.
[4] 张科利,彭文英,杨红丽.中国土壤可蚀性值及其估算[J].土壤学报,2007,44(1):7-13.
Zhang K L, Peng W Y, Yang H L. Soil erodibility and its estimation for agricultural soil in China[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2007,44(1):7-13.
[5] 宋春风,陶和平,刘斌涛,等.长江上游地区土壤可蚀性空间分异特征[J].长江流域资源与环境,2012,21(9):1123-1130.
Song C F, Tao H P, Liu B T, et al. Spatial distribution characteristics of soil erodibility K value in the upper Yangtze River[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2012,21(9):1123-1130.
[6] 朱明勇,谭淑端,张全发.南水北调中线工程水源地的土壤可蚀性特征[J].长江流域资源与环境,2014,23(8):1161-1165.
Zhu M Y, Tan S D, Zhang Q F. Characteristics of soil erodibility in the South-to-North Water Transfer Project(Middle Route), China[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2014,23(8):1161-1165.
[7] 李季孝,丁剑宏,陶余铨,等.云南省土壤可蚀性及其空间分布特征[J].人民黄河,2019,41(8):103-106.
Li J X, Ding J H, Tao Y Q, et al. Soil erodibility and its spatial distribution characteristics in Yunnan Province[J]. Yellow River, 2019,41(8):103-106. ].
[8] 荆莎莎,张荣华,张庆红,等.沂蒙山区典型县土壤可蚀性K值空间变异研究[J].土壤通报,2017,48(2):278-284.
Jing S S, Zhang R H, Zhang Q H, et al. Spatial variability on K value of soil erodibility in typical county of Yimeng Mountain Area[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2017,48(2):278-284.
[9] 管飞,叶明亮,马友华.江淮丘陵区土壤可蚀性K值研究:以肥东县为例[J].中国农学通报,2020,36(1):105-111.
Guan F, Ye M L, Ma Y H. The K value of soil erosion in the Jianghuai hilly area:a case of Feidong County[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020,36(1):105-111.
[10] 岑奕,丁文峰,张平仓.华中地区土壤可蚀性因子研究[J].长江科学院院报,2011,28(10):65-68.
Cen Y, Ding W F, Zhang P C. Spatial distribution of soil erodibility factor(K)in central China[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2011,28(10):65-68.
[11] 高家勇,李瑞,杨坪坪,等.贵州省土壤可蚀性K值空间分布特征及主要影响因子[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(5):77-84.
Gao J Y, Li R, Yang P P, et al. Spatial distribution characteristics and main influencing factor of soil erodibility K values in Guizhou Province[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022,29(5):77-84.
[12] 朱明勇,谭淑端,顾胜,等.湖北丹江口水库库区小流域土壤可蚀性特征[J].土壤通报,2010,41(2):434-436.
Zhu M Y, Tan S D, Gu S, et al. Characteristics of soil erodibility in the Danjiangkou Reservoir Region, Hubei Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2010,41(2):434-436.
[13] 周璟,张旭东,何丹,等.小流域土壤可蚀性的空间变异及其在不同土地类型下的比较[J].土壤通报,2011,42(3):715-720.
Zhou J, Zhang X D, He D, et al. Spatial variability of soil erodibility and its comparison between different landuse types of small watershed[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2011,42(3):715-720.
[14] 王敬贵,亢庆,邝高明,等.尖山河小流域土壤可蚀性K值空间变异研究[J].生态环境学报,2014,23(4):555-560.
Wang J G, Kang Q, Kuang G M, et al. Spatial variability of soil erodibility(K-factor)in Jianshan watershed of Yunnan province[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2014,23(4):555-560.
[15] 胡克志.丹江鹦鹉沟小流域土壤可蚀性空间分异特征研究[J].中国水土保持,2016(7):44-48.
Hu K Z. Study on spatial diifferentiation characteristics of soil erodibility in the small watershed of Yingwu gully in Danjiang[J]. Soil and Water Conservation in China, 2016(7):44-48.
[16] 李学峰,饶良懿,徐也钦.砒砂岩不同类型区土壤氮磷养分特征[J].农业工程学报,2022,38(5):139-147.
Li X F, Rao L Y, Xu Y Q. Characteristics of soil nitrogen and phosphorus nutrients in different Pisha sandstone areas[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2022,38(5):139-147.
[17] Liang Z S, Wu Z R, Yao W Y, et al. Pisha sandstone:Causes, processes and erosion options for its control and prospects[J]. International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 2019,7(1):1-8.
[18] 马章怀.覆土砒砂岩区典型退化植被下土壤水分特征及调控[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2020. DOI:10,27409/d.cnki.gxbnu, 2020.001109.
Ma Z H. Characteristic and regulation of soil moisture under typical degraded vegetation in loess covered Pisha Sandstone area[D]. Yangling, Shaanxi: Northwest A&F University, 2020.
[19] 高玄娜.复合侵蚀作用下砒砂岩坡面泥沙搬运机制研究[D].郑州:华北水利水电大学,2021. DOI:10,27144/d. cnki. ghbsc, 2021.000230.
Gao X N. Study on sediment transport mechanism of Pisha Sandstone slope under combined erosion[D]. Zhengzhou: North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, 2021.
[20] 曹亚莉.高温处理砒砂岩物化性质及改性材料性能研究[D].郑州:华北水利水电大学,2020.
Cao Y L. Study on Physicochemical properties and properties of modified materials in high temperature treatment of pisha sandstone[D]. Zhengzhou: North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, 2020.
[21] 饶良懿,徐也钦,胡剑汝,等.砒砂岩覆土区小流域土壤可蚀性K值研究[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,2020,28(4):763-773.
Rao L Y, Xu Y Q, Hu J R, et al. Study on soil erodibilty factor K on soil cover area of Pisha Sandstone Region[J]. Journal of Basic Science and Engineering, 2020,28(4):763-773.
[22] 邢启鑫,饶良懿,王志臻,等.内蒙古砒砂岩不同类型区土壤有机质与速效钾特征[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(6):257-264,272.
Xing Q X, Rao L Y, Wang Z Z, et al. Characteristics of soil organic matter and available potassium in different types of Pisha Sandstone Area of Inner Mongolia[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019,33(6):257-264,272.
[23] 范晓梅,刘高焕,刘红光.基于Kriging和Cokriging方法的黄河三角洲土壤盐渍化评价[J].资源科学,2014,36(2):321-327.
Fan X M, Liu G H, Liu H G. Evaluating the spatial distribution of soil salinity in the Yellow River Delta based on Kriging and Cokriging methods[J]. Resources Science, 2014,36(2):321-327.
[24] 史培军,刘宝元,张科利,等.土壤侵蚀过程与模型研究[J].资源科学,1999,21(5):9-18.
Shi P J, Liu B Y, Zhang K L, et al. Soil erosion process and model studies[J]. Resources Science, 1999,21(5):9-18.
[25] 蔡欣宇.砒砂岩地区高速公路边坡土壤侵蚀研究[D].西安:长安大学,2008.
Cai X Y. Study on Soil erosin of expressway slope in Pisha Sandstone Area[D]. Xi'an: Chang'an University, 2008.
[26] 薛永伟,王茹.紫色土丘陵区不同土地利用条件土壤的可蚀性K值[J].江苏农业科学,2016,44(11):488-491.
Xue Y W, Wang R. Soil erodibility K values under different land use conditions in purple soil hilly region[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2016,44(11):488-491.
[27] Geng R, Zhang G H, Ma Q H, et al. Effects of landscape positions on soil resistance to rill erosion in a small catchment on the Loess Plateau[J]. Biosystems Engineering, 2017,160:95-108.
[28] 钟旭珍,张素,吴瑞娟,等.沱江流域土壤侵蚀动态变化及驱动力分析[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(2):43-49.
Zhong X Z, Zhang S, Wu R J, et al. Analysis of dynamic changes and driving forces of soil erosion in Tuojiang River Basin[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022,29(2):43-49.
[29] 贾振宇,张俊华,丁圣彦,等.基于GIS和地统计学的黄泛区土壤磷空间变异:以周口为例[J].应用生态学报,2016,27(4):1211-1220.
Jia Z Y, Zhang J H, Ding S Y, et al. Spatial variation of soil phosphorus in flooded area of the Yellow River based on GIS and geo-statistical methods[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016,27(4):1211-1220.
[30] Jiang Q H, Zhou P G, Liao C, et al. Spatial pattern of soil erodibility factor(K)as affected by ecological restoration in a typical degraded watershed of central China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020,749:141609.
相似文献/References:
[1]杨 玲,贺秀斌,鲍玉海,等.水库消落带不同海拔狗牙根草地土壤可蚀性研究[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(05):1.
YANG Ling,HE Xiubin,BAO Yuhai,et al.Soil Erodibility of Cynodon dactylon Grassland at Different Altitudes in the Reservoir Riparian Zone[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(03):1.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2023-05-09 修回日期:2023-07-11
资助项目:北京市科技新星计划(2006A22); 国家重点研发计划“砒砂岩区复合土壤侵蚀综合治理技术”(2017YFC0504503)
第一作者:蒙雯洋(1996—),女,重庆人,硕士,研究方向:流域自然地理过程。E-mail:1061234065@qq.com
通信作者:饶良懿(1976—),女,福建建瓯人,教授,博导,研究方向:水土保持,生态系统修复与管理。E-mail:raoliangyi@bjfu.edu.cn