ZHOU Luhong,YANG Guangxu.Spatiotemporal Evolution Analysis and Obstacle Factor Diagnosis of the Coupling Relationship Between Resource and Environmental Carrying Capacity and Economic Development Level in Hefei City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(03):440-447.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.03.052]
合肥市资源环境承载力与经济发展水平耦合关系的时空演变分析及障碍因素诊断
- Title:
- Spatiotemporal Evolution Analysis and Obstacle Factor Diagnosis of the Coupling Relationship Between Resource and Environmental Carrying Capacity and Economic Development Level in Hefei City
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2023)03-0440-08
- Keywords:
- resource and environmental carrying capacity; economic development level; coupling relationship; obstacle factor; Hefei City
- 分类号:
- X22; X826
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- [目的]探究资源环境承载力和经济发展水平关系的时空演变特征和障碍因素的识别,对区域生态文明建设和可持续协调发展具有重要理论意义。[方法]以合肥市为研究对象,构建合肥市资源环境承载力和经济发展水平指标体系,利用状态空间法模型、耦合模型、障碍度模型等方法,测算分析了合肥市2011—2020年资源环境承载力与经济发展水平之间的耦合协调程度及演变过程并识别了制约两者的障碍因素。[结果]合肥市资源环境承载力和经济发展水平指数值均呈现上升趋势,资源环境承载力和经济发展水平不断增强。2011—2020年资源环境承载力和经济发展水平耦合度数值在0.48～0.50之间,类型属拮抗状态,耦合协调度水平处于0.42～0.65之间,呈现上升趋势,经历了从轻度失调到低水平协调再到良好协调发展的过程。从障碍因素识别来看,制约合肥市资源环境承载力的障碍因素主要来自要素层环境容量要素,制约合肥市经济发展水平的障碍因素主要来源于经济实力和经济结构要素,这三个要素也是制约资源环境与经济协调发展的关键所在。[结论]通过对资源环境承载力和经济发展水平之间关系的研究及其障碍因素的准确识别,增添了合肥市资源环境与经济协调发展的理论支撑。
- Abstract:
- [Objective]Exploring the temporal and spatial evolution characteristics of the relationship between the carrying capacity of resources and the environment and the level of economic development and the identification of obstacles has important theoretical significance for the construction of regional ecological civilization and sustainable coordinated development. [Methods] This study took Hefei City as the research object, and an index system of Hefei City's resource and environmental carrying capacity and economic development level was constructed. State space method model, coupling model, obstacle degree model and other methods, the coupling coordination degree and evolution process between resource and environmental carrying capacity and economic development level in Hefei City from 2011 to 2020 were calculated and analyzed, and the obstacle factors restricting both were identified. [Results] The index values of Hefei's resource and environmental carrying capacity and economic development level both showed an upward trend, and the resource and environmental carrying capacity and economic development level continued to increase. From 2011 to 2020, the coupling degree between resource and environmental carrying capacity and economic development level was between 0.48 and 0.50, and the type was antagonistic. The level of coupling coordination was between 0.42 and 0.65, showing an upward trend, and had experienced a process of development from mild imbalance to low level coordination and then to good coordination. From the point of view of the identification of obstacles, the obstacle factors restricting the resource and environmental carrying capacity of Hefei mainly came from the environmental capacity factors of the element layer, the obstacles to the economic development level of Hefei mainly came from economic strength and economic structural elements. These three elements were also the key to restricting the coordinated development of resources, environment and economy. [Conclusions] The study of the relationship between the carrying capacity of resources and the environment and the level of economic development and the accurate identification of the obstacle factors can supply the theoretical support for the coordinated development of resources, environment and economy in Hefei City.
参考文献/References:
[1] 封志明,杨艳昭,闫慧敏,等.百年来的资源环境承载力研究:从理论到实践[J].资源科学,2017,39(3):379-395.
[2] 谭琨,严直慧,赵祖军,等.基于模糊评价的喀斯特山区文山市资源环境承载力评价[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(1):218-227.
[3] 傅鸿源,胡焱.城市综合承载力研究综述[J].城市问题,2009,166(5):27-31.
[4] 任祁荣,于恩逸.甘肃省生态环境与社会经济系统协调发展的耦合分析[J].生态学报,2021,41(8):2944-2953.
[5] Bradford D F, Fender R A, Shore S H, et al. The Environmental Kuznets Curve: Exploring a Fresh Specification[J]. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 2005,4(1):1-30.
[6] Grossman G M, Krueger A B. Environmental impacts of a north american free trade agreement[J]. Cepr Discussion Papers, 1992,8(2):223-250.
[7] 牛方曲,孙东琪.资源环境承载力与中国经济发展可持续性模拟[J].地理学报,2019,74(12):2604-2613.
[8] 张晓东,池天河.90年代中国省级区域经济与环境协调度分析[J].地理研究,2001,20(4):506-515.
[9] 谷国锋,王雪辉.东北地区经济发展与生态环境耦合关系时空分析[J].东北师大学报:哲学社会科学版,2018,294(4):154-160.
[10] 张进.华北地区农业资源环境与经济增长协调性分析[J].中国农业资源与区划,2020,41(4):27-33.
[11] 赵雪雁.甘肃省经济发展与环境质量的交互耦合关系[J].干旱区资源与环境,2008,22(6):1-7.
[12] 金贵,郭柏枢,成金华,等.基于资源效率的国土空间布局及支撑体系框架[J].地理学报,2022,77(3):534-546.
[13] 程超,童绍玉,彭海英.滇中城市群经济发展水平与资源环境承载力的脱钩分析[J].中国农业资源与划,2017,38(3):121-130.
[14] 蒋溢.绵阳市生态环境与经济协调发展研究[J].中国农业资源与区划,2017,38(3):131-135.
[15] 杨亮洁,杨永春.甘肃省资源环境承载力时空分异[J].生态学报,2017,37(20):7000-7017.
[16] 何秋萍.珠江资源环境承载力指标体系构建[J].中国农业资源与区划,2018,39(7):99-105.
[17] 刘金花,郑璐,董光龙,等.平原地区资源环境承载力评价与短板要素分析:以山东省平原县为例[J].中国农业资源与区划,2019,40(2):79-88.
[18] 张引,杨庆媛,闵婕.重庆市新型城镇化质量与生态环境承载力耦合分析[J].地理学报,2016,71(5):817-828.
[19] 袁久和,祁春节.基于熵值法的湖南省农业可持续发展能力动态评价[J].长江流域资源与环境,2013,22(2):152-157.
[20] 余丹林,毛汉英,高群.状态空间衡量区域承载状况初探:以环渤海地区为例[J].地理研究,2003,22(2):201-210.
[21] 丁宇,张雷,马昕琳.山地城镇化与资源环境承载力耦合协调发展的时空演变[J].环境科学研究,2022,35(2):592-600.
[22] 王志芳,李婷,高伟明.河北省沿海地区海洋资源环境承载力与经济发展水平耦合分析[J].海洋湖沼通报,2021,43(6):58-65.
[23] 卫思夷,居祥,荀文会.区域国土开发强度与资源环境承载力时空耦合关系研究:以沈阳经济区为例[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(7):58-65.
[24] 郑力燕,毕相东,宋伦,等.基于熵值-突变级数法的环渤海地区海洋生态环境承载力评价及障碍因子诊断[J].海洋通报,2018,37(5):591-600.
[25] 刘志有,曲秀武,魏冉,等.生态文明视角下的伊犁河谷绿洲土地生态安全评价及障碍因子诊断[J].水土保持通报,2022,42(1):137-143.
相似文献/References:
[1]翁翎燕.基于突变级数法的江苏省资源环境承载力评价及障碍因素诊断[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(03):354.
WENG Lingyan.Evaluation of Resources and Environment Carrying Capacity Based on Catastrophe Progression Method and Diagnosis of Its Obstacle Indicators in Jiangsu Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(03):354.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2022-05-16 修回日期:2022-06-24
资助项目:陕西省土地整治重点实验室开放基金(2019-JC02); 长安大学研究生教育教学改革资助项目(300103120050)
第一作者:周璐红(1975—),女,陕西宝鸡人,副教授,博士,研究方向为土地资源管理及评价。E-mail:zylhzhou@chd.edu.cn