SUN Jinxin,HAN Mei,KONG Xianglun,et al.Spatio-Temporal Characteristics and Suggestions for High-Quality Development of Nature Protected Areas in the Lower Reaches of the Yellow River[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(03):395-402,412.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.03.051]
黄河下游自然保护地时空分布特征与高质量发展建议——以山东省为例
- Title:
- Spatio-Temporal Characteristics and Suggestions for High-Quality Development of Nature Protected Areas in the Lower Reaches of the Yellow River
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2023)03-0395-08
- Keywords:
- nature protected areas; lower reaches of the Yellow River; spatio-temporal characteristics; kernel density; high-quality development
- 分类号:
- TU982
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- [目的]自然保护地建设是促进生态文明建设和生态环境高质量发展的重要手段,研究自然保护地的时空特征能够深化对其历史进程、资源禀赋、功能定位等的认识,对自然保护地高质量发展具有重要的指导意义。[方法]采用全局莫兰指数、标准差椭圆、核密度估计等方法,对黄河下游1980—2020年设立的自然保护地的时空分布特征进行了深入分析研究。[结果]在发展历程上,研究区自然保护地建设经历了起步探索、稳步发展、规范发展3个阶段,由注重数量增长逐渐转向质量提升。在空间分布上,自然保护地呈东北—西南方向展布,40年来分布重心总体向西南方向迁移了88.199 km,自然保护地整体聚集程度不断提高,以鲁中南山地丘陵区与鲁东低山丘陵区最为聚集,分别形成类似除号“÷”和“双峰形”的两个高密度片区。在影响因素上,地形地貌、水热条件、物种多样性、植被覆盖等是影响自然保护地空间分布、资源禀赋等的重要因素; 政策导向、生态保护意识的提高等是导致自然保护地数量增加、质量提高的重要因素。[结论]为促进自然保护地高质量发展,黄河下游地区应依据自然保护地分布格局规划“生态城”,发展特色生态旅游,由点及面地整合全域生态资源。研究结果可为黄河下游自然保护地高质量发展提供可靠建议。
- Abstract:
- [Objective]The construction of nature protected areas(NPAs)is an important means to promote the construction of ecological civilization and the high-quality development of ecological environment. The study of the spatio-temporal characteristics of NPAs can deepen the understanding of its historical process, resource endowment and function positioning, and has an important guiding significance for the high-quality development of NPAs. [Methods]The global Moran index, standard deviation ellipse and kernel density estimation were used to analyze the spatial and temporal distribution characteristics of the nature reserves established in the lower reaches of the Yellow River between 1980 and 2020. [Results] In terms of spatial distribution, NPAs spread in a northeast-southwest direction, and their distribution center of gravity had generally shifted 88.199 km to the southwest over the past 40 years. The overall aggregation of NPAs had been increasing, with the most aggregation in the mountainous hills of south central Shandong Province and the low mountainous hills of east Shandong Province, forming two high-density areas similar to the division sign ‘÷' and ‘bimodal', respectively. In terms of development history, the study area had experienced three stages: initial exploration, steady development, and standardized development, and gradually shifted from focusing on quantitative growth to quality improvement. In terms of influencing factors, topography and geomorphology, water and heat conditions, species diversity, and vegetation cover were important factors affecting the spatial distribution and resource endowment of NPAs. Policy orientation and the improvement of ecological protection awareness were important factors leading to the increase in the quantity and quality of NPAs. [Conclusions] In order to promote the high-quality development of NPAs, ecological cities in the lower reaches of the Yellow River region should be planned based on the distribution pattern of NPAs, special ecological tourism should be developed, and ecological resources should be integrated from the point to the surface in the whole region. The results of the study can provide reliable suggestions for the high-quality development of NPAs in the lower reaches of the Yellow River.
参考文献/References:
[1] 刘超.“自然保护地”法律概念之析义与梳正[J].暨南学报:哲学社会科学版,2020,42(10):24-39.
[2] 陈战是,于涵,孙铁,等.生态文明视野下自然保护地规划的研究与思考[J].中国园林,2020,36(11):14-18.
[3] 郭子良,祝伟,雷茵茹,等.自然保护地管理有效性评估方法综述[J].世界林业研究,2020,33(3):13-19.
[4] 肖练练,钟林生,周睿,等.近30年来国外国家公园研究进展与启示[J].地理科学进展,2017,36(2):244-255.
[5] 李博炎,朱彦鹏,刘伟玮,等.中国国家公园体制试点进展、问题及对策建议[J].生物多样性,2021,29(3):283-289.
[6] 胡德胜,许胜晴,归帆.黄河流域自然保护地管理体制机制的立法规制[J].中国软科学,2021(11):1-9.
[7] 秦天宝,刘彤彤.自然保护地立法的体系化:问题识别、逻辑建构和实现路径[J].法学论坛,2020,35(2):131-140.
[8] 刘某承,王佳然,刘伟玮,等.国家公园生态保护补偿的政策框架及其关键技术[J].生态学报,2019,39(4):1330-1337.
[9] 程立峰,张惠远.实现自然保护地共建共享的路径建议[J].环境保护,2019,47(19):8-10.
[10] 张语克,张琼悦,张跃,等.自然保护地环境解说资源研究:以九寨沟芦苇海解说步道为例[J].生物多样性,2022,30(2):73-90.
[11] 梦梦,刘鑫,赵英男,等.自然保护地环境教育实践与研究现状[J].世界林业研究,2020,33(2):31-36.
[12] 翁爱芳,范少贞,卢远清,等.基于成本效益评估的县域自然保护地优化整合方案比较研究:以福建省泰宁县为例[J].自然资源学报,2021,36(8):2020-2037.
[13] 朱里莹,徐姗,兰思仁.中国国家级保护地空间分布特征及对国家公园布局建设的启示[J].地理研究,2017,36(2):307-320.
[14] 罗红,陈磊,姜运力,等.自然保护地整合优化的景观格局变化分析:以贵州省思南县为例[J].生态学报,2021,41(20):8076-8086.
[15] 高吉喜,刘晓曼,周大庆,等.中国自然保护地整合优化关键问题[J].生物多样性,2021,29(3):290-294.
[16] 樊涵,杨朝辉,王丞,等.贵州省自然保护地时空演变特征及影响因素[J].应用生态学报,2021,32(3):1005-1014.
[17] 周婷,牛安逸,马姣娇,等.国家湿地公园时空格局特征[J].自然资源学报,2019,34(1):26-39.
[18] Xu B C, Pan J H. Spatial distribution characteristics of national protected areas in China[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2019,29(12):2047-2068.
[19] 潘竟虎,徐柏翠.中国国家级自然保护地的空间分布特征与可达性[J].长江流域资源与环境,2018,27(2):353-362.
[20] 马坤,唐晓岚.长江中游流域国家级自然保护地交叉重叠特征及其优化整合研究[J].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2022,46(3):12-20.
[21] 梅林,姜洪强.基于Airbnb数据的北京市民宿空间分异过程、因素与趋势[J].经济地理,2021,41(3):213-222.
[22] 黄葵.重庆市乡村旅游资源空间特征及其与乡村振兴关系研究[J].中国农业资源与区划,2020,41(4):216-224.
[23] 麻学锋,刘玉林.旅游产业成长与城市空间形态演变的关系:以张家界为例[J].经济地理,2019,39(5):226-234.
[24] 刘敏,郝炜,张芙蓉.山西省A级景区空间分布与影响因素[J].经济地理,2020,40(8):231-240.
[25] 陈刚,吴清,杨俭波,等.中国国家森林乡村的空间分布特征与影响因素[J].经济地理,2021,41(6):196-204.
[26] 王劲峰,徐成东.地理探测器:原理与展望[J].地理学报,2017,72(1):116-134.
[27] 樊涵,王晓娟,杨朝辉,等.遵义市4种主要自然保护地空间分布特征及其影响因素研究[J].生态与农村环境学报,2020,36(3):334-341.
[28] 杨利,石彩霞,谢炳庚.长江流域国家湿地公园时空演变特征及其驱动因素[J].经济地理,2019,39(11):194-202.
[29] 王兆峰,史伟杰.中国美丽休闲乡村的空间分布特征及影响因素[J].地理科学,2022,42(1):104-114.
[30] 刘敏,郝炜.山西省国家A级旅游景区空间分布影响因素研究[J].地理学报,2020,75(4):878-888.
[31] 何思源,王博杰,王国萍,等.自然保护地社区生计转型与产业发展[J].生态学报,2021,41(23):9207-9215.
[32] 吴必虎,谢冶凤,张玉钧.自然保护地游憩和旅游:生态系统服务、法定义务与社会责任[J].旅游科学,2021,35(5):1-10.
[33] 赵力,张炜,刘楠,等.国家公园理念下区域生态旅游资源评价:以青海湖与祁连山毗邻区域为例[J].干旱区地理,2021,44(6):1796-1809.
[34] 欧阳志云,杜傲,徐卫华.中国自然保护地体系分类研究[J].生态学报,2020,40(20):7207-7215.
[35] 李群绩,王灵恩.中国自然保护地旅游资源利用的冲突和协调路径分析[J].地理科学进展,2020,39(12):2105-2117.
[36] 余付勤,张百平,王晶,等.国外大尺度生态廊道保护进展与秦岭国家公园建设[J].自然资源学报,2021,36(10):2478-2490.
相似文献/References:
[1]王随继,刘 慰,颜 明,等.黄河下游汛期输沙效率和排沙比阶段性变化及其主控因素分析[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(02):104.
WANG Suiji,LIU Wei,YAN Ming,et al.Stepped Changes in Suspended Sediment Transport Efficiency and Discharge Ratio and the Main Causes in the Lower Reaches of Yellow River[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(03):104.
[2]石秀雄,杨广斌,李 蔓,等.贵州省国家级自然保护地空间格局特征分析[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(06):323.
SHI Xiuxiong,YANG Guangbin,LI Man,et al.Analysis on Spatial Pattern of National Protected Area in Guizhou Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(03):323.
[3]张小磊,裴颖春,夏长会,等.黄河下游典型潮土区玉米地径流氮素流失特征[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(05):113.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.05.038.]
ZHANG Xiaolei,PEI Yingchun,XIA Zhanghui,et al.Characteristics of Nitrogen Loss from Corn Field Surface Runoff in Typical Fluvo-aquic Soil Area of the Lower Reaches of the Yellow River[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(03):113.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.05.038.]
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2022-04-27 修回日期:2022-05-12
资助项目:国家社会科学基金项目“海陆统筹视角下黄河三角洲湿地生态健康的路径与管理机制研究”(21BGL026)
第一作者:孙金欣(1998—),女,山东德州人,硕士研究生,研究方向为环境变化与区域响应研究。E-mail:sunjinxineeeee@163.com
通信作者:韩美(1963—),女,山东潍坊人,教授,研究方向为环境变化与区域响应研究。E-mail:hanmei568568@126.com