LIU Xu,BAI Yiru,MA Xian.Effects of PAM on Soil Water Movement and Hydraulic Parameters of Urban Green Spaces in Yinchuan[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(03):217-224.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.03.013]
PAM对银川城市绿地土壤水分运动及水力参数的影响
- Title:
- Effects of PAM on Soil Water Movement and Hydraulic Parameters of Urban Green Spaces in Yinchuan
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2023)03-0217-08
- Keywords:
- urban green space soil; PAM; water movement; hydraulic parameters
- 分类号:
- S152
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- [目的]探究不同PAM施加比例下城市绿地土壤水分运动及水力参数的变化,为城市绿地建设和合理利用水资源提供理论参考。[方法]以银川城市绿地土壤为研究对象,采用垂直一维土柱试验,选取5种聚丙烯酰胺(PAM)施加比例(质量比)0%(CK),0.02%(T1),0.04%(T2),0.06%(T3),0.08%(T4),0.1%(T5),研究湿润锋进程、累积入渗量和入渗速率等入渗特征参数,比较Philip模型、Horton模型、Kostiakov模型及通用经验模型在本研究中的适用性,分析PAM施加比例对土壤水力参数的影响。[结果]入渗历时300 min时,T1,T2,T3,T4和T5较CK相比,湿润锋进程分别减少了5.2%,12.0%,13.2%,15.4%和24.2%,累积入渗量分别减少5.9%,12.8%,14.7%,21.4%和31.5%。T1,T2,T3,T4和T5稳定入渗速率较CK分别减小10.1%,22.4%,23.3%,29.2%和41.6%; 4种入渗模型中Horton模型最适合描述研究区不同PAM施加比例下的城市绿地土壤水分入渗过程(R2>0.886)。滞留含水率θr、饱和含水率θs、形状系数n随PAM施加比例增大而增大,进气吸力倒数α、饱和导水率Ks随PAM施加比例增大而减小。[结论]研究表明PAM可以有效改善银川城市绿地土壤水分快速渗漏、持水性能差的状况,提高土壤保水能力。
- Abstract:
- [Objective]This study explored soil water movement and hydraulic parameters of urban green space with different PAM application ratios to provide theoretical reference for building urban green space and utilizing water resources. [Methods] The soil of urban green space in Yinchuan was taken as the research sample. The vertical one-dimensional soil column test was adopted, 5 PAM addition rates of 0%(CK), 0.02%(T1), 0.04%(T2), 0.06%(T3), 0.08%(T4), 0.1%(T5)were added to urban green space soil of Yinchuan. The process of wetting front, cumulative infiltration amount, and infiltration rate were studied. The applicability of the Philip model, Horton model, Kostiakov model and general empirical formula in the soil moisture infiltration process of Yinchuan urban green space containing PAM was comparedt. The effect of PAM application on soil hydraulic parameters was analyzed. [Results] Compared with CK, the wet front processes of T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5 treatments decreased by 5.2%, 12.0%, 13.2%, 15.4% and 24.2%, respectively, and the cumulative infiltration amount reduced by 5.9%, 12.8%, 14.7%, 21.4% and 31.5%, respectively, when the infiltration lasted 300 minutes. Compared with CK, T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5 reduced the stable infiltration rate by 10.1%, 22.4%, 23.3%, 29.2% and 41.6%, respectively. The comprehensive comparison results indicated that the simulated accuracies of the four infiltration models decreased in the order: Horton>Kostiakov>Philip>General Empirical Model. The retained water content θr, saturated water content θs and shape coefficient n increased with the increase of PAM application rate, while the reciprocal α of intake suction and saturated hydraulic conductivity Ks decreased with the increase of PAM application rate. [Conclusion] The addition of PAM can effectively remedy the phenomenon of deep soil leakage and poor water retention in Yinchuan urban green land.
参考文献/References:
[1] 张昌顺,谢高地,鲁春霞,等.北京城市绿地对热岛效应的缓解作用[J].资源科学,2015,37(6):1156-1165.
[2] 高吉喜,宋婷,张彪,等.北京城市绿地群落结构对降温增湿功能的影响[J].资源科学,2016,38(6):1028-1038.
[3] 郑国保,张源沛,孔德杰,等.不同灌溉定额对枸杞土壤水分动态变化规律的影响[J].西北农业学报,2012,21(2):117-120.
[4] 王幼奇,包维斌,赵云鹏,等.生物炭添加对淡灰钙土水分入渗过程的影响[J].灌溉排水学报,2018,37(12):60-65.
[5] 张妙,李秧秧,白岗栓.生物炭和PAM共施对黄绵土水分入渗和蒸发的影响[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(5):124-130.
[6] 李晓菊,单鱼洋,王全九,等.腐殖酸对滨海盐碱土水盐运移特征的影响[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(6):288-293.
[7] 杜学军,闫彬伟,许紫峻,等.脱硫石膏对苏打盐碱土水盐入渗过程的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2021,39(3):179-183.
[8] 单鱼洋,马晨光,王全九,等.羧甲基纤维素钠对壤砂土水分运动及水力参数的影响[J].土壤学报,2022,59(5):1349-1358.
[9] 陆绍娟,王占礼.土壤改良剂聚丙烯酰胺的研究进展[J].人民黄河,2016,38(7):73-77.
[10] 王丽,王力,王全九.PAM对不同坡度坡地产流产沙及氮磷流失的影响[J].环境科学学报,2015,35(12):3956-3964.
[11] 杨永辉,武继承,赵世伟,等. PAM的土壤保水性能研究[J].西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版,2007,35(12):120-124.
[12] 哈丽代姆·居麦,宁松瑞,王全九,等.施加PAM与CMC对土壤水分入渗与蒸发特征的影响[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(1):121-127,134.
[13] 王春霞,王全九,吕廷波,等.添加化学改良剂的砂质盐碱土入渗特征试验研究[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(1):31-35.
[14] 王全九,张继红,谭帅.微咸水入渗下施加PAM土壤水盐运移特性研究[J].土壤学报,2016,53(4):1056-1064.
[15] 王晨光,郝珊,陆思旭,等.添加PAM对城市绿地换填介质性质的影响[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(3):356-361.
[16] 郝珊,王晨光,张阿凤,等.不同物料配比对城市绿地土壤渗透性及污染物净化效果的影响[J].应用生态学报,2020,31(4):1349-1356.
[17] 马笑,王晨光,郝珊,等.聚丙烯酰胺和椰糠配合对绿地土壤换填介质渗、蓄、净的效果[J].地球环境学报,2020,11(1):112-118.
[18] Philip J R. The theory of infiltration:1. The infiltration equation and its solution[J]. Soil Science, 1957,83(5):345-358.
[19] 包维斌,白一茹,赵云鹏,等.生物炭添加对宁夏中部旱区土壤水分入渗及持水性的影响[J].土壤通报,2018,49(6):1326-1332.
[20] Mehuys G R, Stolzy L H, Letey J, et al. Effect of stones on the hydraulic conductivity of relatively dry desert soil[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1975,39(1):37-42.
[21] 周晓冰,栾永霞,林青,等.数值反演模型模拟层状土壤水力性质[J].土壤学报,2021,58(5):1214-1223.
[22] 张育华,周蓓蓓,陈晓鹏,等.基于Hydrus模拟纳米碳对黄土坡面土壤水分运动特征的影响[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(1):132-138.
[23] 白一茹,张兴,王幼奇,等.不同残膜含量对淡灰钙土水分入渗过程的影响[J].农业资源与环境学报,2019,36(2):227-235.
[24] 刘建军,王全九,王卫华,等.利用Hydrus-1 D反推土壤水力参数方法分析[J].世界科技研究与发展,2010,32(2):173-175.
[25] 马蒙蒙,林青,徐绍辉.不同因素影响下层状土壤水分入渗特征及水力学参数估计[J].土壤学报,2020,57(2):347-358.
[26] 朱超凡,黄金柏,顾准,等.基于HYDRUS-1 D的城市草地土壤水分模拟:以扬州市人工草地为例[J].水土保持通报,2021,41(3):118-126.
[27] 韩冬,魏占民,于健,等.干粉PAM溶解时间对土壤饱和导水率的动态影响[J].土壤,2016,48(2):368-373.
[28] Sirjacobs D, Shainberg I, Rapp I, et al. Polyacrylamide, sediments, and interrupted flow effects on rill erosion and intake rate[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2000,64(4):1487-1495.
[29] 张春强,冯浩. PAM和尿素混施对土壤入渗特性的影响[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(4):109-113,135.
[30] 曹雨桐,佘冬立.施用生物炭和聚丙烯酰胺对海涂围垦区盐碱土水力性质的影响[J].应用生态学报,2017,28(11):3684-3690.
[31] 魏恒,赵成义,孙栋元.塔里木河上游绿洲典型地表特征土壤水分入渗性能研究[J].冰川冻土,2010,32(4):837-843.
[32] 武敏,冯绍元,孙春燕,等.北京市大兴区典型土壤水分入渗规律田间试验研究[J].中国农业大学学报,2009,14(4):98-102.
相似文献/References:
[1]齐芳燕,于法展,李保杰.苏北地区各城市绿地土壤的理化性状相关性分析[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(02):90.
QI Fang-yan,YU Fa-zhan,LI Bao-jie.Analysis of Physicochemistry Properties and Nutrient Characteristics of Greenbelt Soils of Different City Zones in Northern Jiangsu Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(03):90.
[2]武玲珍,傅瓦利,杨红英,等.城市绿地土壤理化性质和Pb、Cd含量空间分布——以重庆市北碚区为例[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(05):171.
WU Ling-zhen,FU Wa-li,YANG Hong-ying,et al.Analysis of Spatial Variability of Pb, Cd and Urban Soil Physical and Chemical Properties-A Case Study of Beibei in Chongqing City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(03):171.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2022-04-19 修回日期:2022-04-29
资助项目:国家自然科学基金项目(41761049,41867003); 宁夏自然科学资助项目(2020AAC03049); 国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFC1802906)
第一作者:刘旭(1995—),男,湖南邵阳人,硕士研究生,主要从土壤侵蚀防治研究。E-mail:liuxu0506@163.com
通信作者:白一茹(1984—),女,陕西渭南人,副教授,主要从事水土保持与荒漠化防治、土壤物理性质研究。E-mail:yr0823@163.com